Jump to content

BurpleBull

Community Member
  • Posts

    1,492
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by BurpleBull

  1. 45 minutes ago, Kmart128 said:

    Because he got called for a personal foul and wanted to look like a victim to distract the multiple hits to Tyrods head. People love to lie and get others in trouble in this day of age. The harrassment claims... This racist claims. It's really sad honestly it's ruining peoples lives. Just look at Danny Masterson. Some girls claimed sexual harrassment and he got fired from his new show. The thing is that these claims were investigated 10-15 years ago and they found no evidence of the claims. Could you imagine being fired for something that supposedly happened over 10 years ago with no evidence... It's BS. People just love to play the victim and ruin other people's lives.

     

    Are you really trying to merge Danny Masterson's situation with this one in an attempt to make Incognito into a victim?

     

    No evidence was found on Masterson which technically makes him innocent, meaning he shouldn't have loss his job if no evidence was found of any wrongdoing; Incognito on the other hand has an actual history of being hotheaded and making racist remarks towards at least one teammate who felt intimidated by him. I'm kind of disgusted that you even tried that.

     

    Someone gets called for a personal foul every week so what was so special about this one that he needed to make up something like that to divert attention away from it?

     

    I promise you his personal foul couldn't have been anywhere close to Gronkowski's hit to White. Had Gronk claimed White hurled a racial slur at him before he reacted the way he did then there would be grounds for you to call bull----.

     

    As you stated, he got called for "A" personal foul, not multiple personal fouls (he would've been ejected), so who exactly was he so concerned with that he had to slander Incognito that way in order to distract from the 'multiple' hits to Tyrod Taylor's head that you mention?

  2. 17 hours ago, Franchiseneedsme said:

    SO I like Tyrod. Problem is he is severely limited, but he also has his strengths. Last year he signed a team friendly deal after finding out the rest of the league doesn't view him as a starter. I would love TT for like $9M a season, not $18m-$20m. Would TT sign a 3 year deal worth $27m?  Guarantee half of it, and I think he might take it. He doesn't seem to be a money chaser, this is undoubtedly his best spot to play, and the fans would love him for signing that deal. Also we would be in great position to build a great team around him. 

    I know it is very unconventional but this year could be the perfect storm for us to use leverage. Flame away. But I like TT for a discounted rate, If it takes market value to sign him he isn't worth it.

     

    "Our price"? "Our" who?

     

    Are you suffering from delusions of being co-owner of the Bills?

     

    Is this the voice of the powerful front office figure that speaks in your head expressing itself?

     

    "Our price"???

     

     

  3. 27 minutes ago, joesixpack said:

     

    we don't want another Losman situation here.

     

     

    Of course not.

     

    I'm just pointing out that 5 Qbs going in the top 10 is unlikely.

     

     

    Aaron Rodgers happened in the same area that the Bills will be picking.

     

    Teams never really seem to be as covetous of the QB fans of teams who lack a franchise QB fear will get away.

     

    FTR, I'm all for the Bills moving up to get a QB if they feel that strongly about him.

  4. 22 minutes ago, Ol Dirty B said:

     

    I wouldn't expect it to change. This inability to deal with something as simple as a woman calling a game is ingrained in people. It's also sexist, like the definition of it.

     

    You're saying you don't want a woman to do something because it's not how it is traditionally done. 

     

    Call me corny, sure, but I'm going to make fun of you because people like you deserve it. You, and I'm talking about you specifically, didn't make any points other than "I just don't want women calling my games".

     

    Uhhh, your little jab is hardly what I consider as being made fun of.

     

    And my stance remains.

  5. 19 minutes ago, Ol Dirty B said:

     

    Weird. I've never been one to long for a man's voice talking to me. 

     

    Maybe you should do some introspection

     

    Yea. That's weird. If you just said she's bad, which i'd agree with, fair point.

     

    But the fact you're just going on about how it can't be a woman announcing my game is just blatant sexism. I mean, it is the definition of it and you do have a problem. It's not a huge problem if it's just this, but I'm not inclined to believe that. 

     

    You're sexist. 

     

    You're so corny. So me not caring for the uncommon sound of a woman's voice calling an NFL game equates to me longing for a man's voice talking to me?

     

    Men have always called the game, that's what I know to be the norm, and I don't care for a game with two women in the booth calling it as the new norm.

     

    If you don't care, that's you, your experience isn't altered. More power to you.

     

    Where I stand is where I stand and it's not changing call it sexist or whatever. I don't care.  

×
×
  • Create New...