Sweats
-
Posts
3,932 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Sweats
-
-
21 hours ago, RichStadiumGuy said:
Trust me... you're not swaying my opinion in the least. I spent 23 years in corporate IT specializing in security for 6 years before retiring and your story sounds pretty... well I'll just say... hard for me to swallow.
Well, it's actually not a story, it's a fact that we performed these tests with our computers and i have no reason to lie about the effects.
And to follow up on this, when i am working for different companies and corporations, i am required to use anti-virus software on their computers, on their networks and on their servers......on my own personal computers, i only have Windows, however, on the off chance that i have to hook my personal computer up to their servers, i have to have anti-virus software on my personal computer (but i've never had to do that yet).
-
If it were up to me (and this is my own preference) i would probably want to watch this game from the comfort of my own couch........i can pause the game and get up and go for a beer whenever i want, i can rewind/replay all of the horrible ref calls against us, etc.
To me, this has "couch game" written all over it.
Also, i can lock myself in my office at home and have a good cry with no one around to hear.......................................................................don't judge me.
-
1
-
-
36 minutes ago, teef said:
our daughter's friend and their family decided to go over the last day or two. i was told they spent $300-400 on tickets, (there are 4 of them) and the flights were about $800 a seat. I assume they're flying out of rochester, but possibly buffalo.
I didn't know Rochester even had an airport..........are they still using the old bi-planes?
-
1
-
3
-
-
45 minutes ago, frostbitmic said:
It's tough to sell 70k tickets in 3 days.
..........not in Buffalo
-
2
-
-
2 hours ago, Scott7975 said:
I don't understand how people disagree with this. You can't impede the receivers route. On top of that he has hold of him. It continued while the ball was in the air and Coleman shoved him off to make a play on the ball. Thats pass interference. I posted the rule from the NFL rulebook above. There is no dispute.
Have you forgotten where you are?!?...........there is always dispute round these parts.
-
1
-
-
All these talking heads with their "great knowledge" of the game.........bwahahahahahahaha.
They all said.......
Jets are going to show the Bills how it's done.............Bills won
Fins are going to give us a beatdown............Bills won
KC in the regular season will show the rest of the league how it's done...........Bills won
SF is going to whip the Bills into submission...........Bills won
The Lions are going to cake walk us............Bills won
Ravens in the post season are going to steam roll us................Bills won
Do you see the theme here?
-
3
-
-
21 minutes ago, HOUSE said:
The Chiefs are really not that good, just eat some clock and maybe bring the officials some hot chocolate
.............and maybe introduce Taylor Swift to the Tush Plow?!?
-
2
-
2
-
-
Turnovers aren't probably going to mean much against KC cause they rarely ever turn the ball over, however, we need to keep playing gritty and go toe to toe with them for a full 60 minutes.
-
1
-
-
Well, we've got a couple of different things to focus on here..........
* Cover Kelce
* Sut down the run game
* Spy Mahomes
I didn't include Worthy cause he's a rookie and usually gets in his own way, so he's not much of a threat to us. History has shown when Reid tries to showcase him that if you shut him down early and often, KC tends to go away from him.
Also, the dude is the size of a twig.......hit him a few times and make him cry.
Teams have shown that if you can pressure Mahomes, he makes bad decisions, and we don't necessarily need to sack him, just force pressure around him and create chaos in his pocket, which forces him to dance around, but if we've got a legitimate spy on him, he'll fold.
Let him know that's it's going to be a longggggggggg day for him if he tries his bull**** with us.
Kelsey is not who he once was. He is still a threat and is still Mahomes number one guy to throw to in a pinch, but if we jam him at the line and disrupt his routes and rhythm, we can slow him down and get him out of the plays.
Absolutely stopping their run game should definitely be high on our list. Like, i'm talking stopping it cold and stopping it before it can even get going.
-
1
-
1
-
-
10 hours ago, Governor said:
Stephen A said we don’t have a chance unless Cooper gets catches.
Stephen A also said the Bills had zero chance against the Ravens and would get steam-rolled, so............
-
1
-
-
23 minutes ago, Ridgewaycynic2013 said:
Surely you jest. Mac Jones looked 'decent'? More like 'descent'. 🤔🤨
A 'mole'? 🤔😁
I don't think Belichick's teet has any moles..........
-
1
-
-
14 minutes ago, colin said:
the o was super conservative and the d basically played rock paper scissors. i think it was a well coached game, and the three biggest errors in coaching/planning came on O
1 -- running qb power on 3rd and 2 from the 2. a tush push, or a less predictable play from shotgun was in order. when all you need is 2 and you have power up front, don't give up an advantage by going into shotgun unless you have a good trick.
2 -- first drive out of the half. they should have shown a prior formation and play actioned into something. those type of transitional moments are where you take those shots. a big gainer on 1st down would have potentially broken the ravens, and a td on that drive would have made the game easy.
3 -- second drive in the 2nd half -- again, the ravens were aggressive up close and had a shell behind, a creative play or qb roll out, whatever would have worked. TY Johnson eats those kinds of formations for breakfast.
joe marino had a breakdown on D. when we blitzed vs when we didn't was shocking. blitzing is when all the good stuff happened, not blitzing is when all the bad stuff happened. also, on that last drive i think our guys were gassed but they advanced the ball vs linemen who wouldn't make the roster of most playoff teams. maybe there was a way to rotate into having better players out there, but that's tough.
this was the second best coached game of the playoffs ever for our staff IMO. the denver game was the best (bad play got them down early, like this one, and they corrected. denver was beat by about 4 mins into the 3rd quarter). we gotta keep it up vs kc.
You don't think the Bills vs. NE (the perfect game) a few years back was the best coached?..........i mean, i can't think of a better game plan than the one i saw from the team that night, i can tell you.
NE had all but given up by the 2nd quarter........threw in the towel, waving the white flag sort of giving up.
-
1
-
-
12 hours ago, hondo in seattle said:
As someone who honestly doesn't know, did McDaniels ever succeed anywhere where he didn't have Bill supervising him?
That's a huge NO.
He single handedly set Denver back about 8-10 years with his piss poor drafting and overall bad decisions with that franchise.........and then couldn't understand why he got fired.
..............he then rushed back to his ole daddy Belichick's teet
Disgusting
-
2
-
-
I don't know if you guys knew this or not, but he's not very good.
-
13 hours ago, Old Coot said:
I think it was because we went up 2 scores with not much time left. I recall thinking that the ravens could not afford another run drive becaue it would take too much time and, sure enough, the ravens went to the pass to conserve time.
Understood, however, in the 3rd quarter Henry and Hill "went off" and started gaining traction and earning their yards and at that point there was still plenty of time on the clock to keep running the ball.
We had no answer for the running game in the 2nd half.
I think Harbough f'd up with his game plan by not continuing to run the ball in the 2nd half, but as others have suggested, maybe he was thinking that because we were so conservative with JA, that the Ravens were looking to keep throwing points on the board as often as they could in case we unleashed JA which may or may have not become a shootout........Harbough would never want that.
Maybe our gameplan and McD got into Harbough's head and made him rethink his strategy.
-
What i'm seeing this year from the Bills is that they are forcing teams to play their best game against us to win.......KC has looked absolutely lackluster all season and i'm hoping this Sunday is not the day for this KC team to "go off".
If we can mentally beat them into submission early and often, we are walking away with the win.........bank on it.
-
3
-
-
1 hour ago, GaryPinC said:
I would rather lose 4 superbowls in a row then deal with the pain Browns fans experience. They have never been to a single SuperBowl, lost 3 AFC championship games in the late 80's, 2 year record 1-31, lost their team that went on to win 2 super bowls, and the times they are starting to put it together ownership meddles and sabotages the situation. Their fan suffering is worse then ours in almost every single way at this point.
Yep, losing 4 superbowls in a row is acutely painful but as a Bills fan living in Cleveland the never-ending failures is an incomparable level of long term pain.
It was a privilege to watch Jimbo and that offense and Bruce and that defense, those were really amazing football years and personalities for the Bills despite never winning a Super Bowl. Much better than even the subsequent 17 years.
Now that you bring it all together in one statement..........i have no words, except that every team's legacy is remembered for something.
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, Augie said:
This is so silly. Of course they want top win it all every year. Were you always first in your class, or were you a failure.
This is childish and tiresome nonsense.
.............oh, i've always been pretty much a failure.
I sleep good at night.
I have problems.
-
2
-
-
17 minutes ago, EasternOHBillsFan said:
I was in high school, watching it on a 13" Sharp tube TV in my bedroom... rabbit ears and all. No one in my family watched football except for me at that time because my father's twin brother, a high school football player, died before they were supposed to graduate together and he couldn't watch.
I'm not trying to make light of this, but does this mean the dead guy couldn't watch?
I'm not sure if i'm reading this correctly.
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, Billsfanatic8989 said:
I can just see it now. Chiefs have the ball. Down 30-28. 4th and 3 at midfield. 20 secobds left.
Mahomes throws a 30 yard pass for Kelce that ends up out of his reach. During this time, Kelce throws the CB down. Both the CB and Kelce fall. Ref calls PI on Bills. Chiefs run it down to two seconds. Kicker hits both uprights somehow. The ball falls through.
Chiefs 31-Bills 28
If that happened, i would stop watching football altogether.........i'm almost there now, by the way.
-
1
-
-
23 hours ago, QB Bills said:
🤣
.......that's a real shame.
-
Watch the KC film, who's the O lineman that always plays about 5' off the LOS?........he never gets called on it and it's a HUGE advantage.
The announcers last weekend were mentioning it during the KC/Texans game that it was a "for sure" penalty and the guy never got called out on it.........and then i couldn't "unsee" it all game long.
-
2
-
-
I don't know, man.......it's -35 over where i live and that's impacting me even going outside today.
-
1
-
3
-
-
Ball placement was a little off and LJ was a half second too late in throwing it.
-
1
-
Is the ball control offensive approach mostly to protect the defense?
in The Stadium Wall
Posted
It reminds me of when Dallas drafted Elliot so high and even saying, " we need a solid RB to help our D" and at the time i didn't get it cause obviously the RB plays O and what the hell does that have to do with the D?
But a good RB can chunk their way down the field, chewing up the clock, which allows the D a longer period of time to rest.
Ah, now i get it and it makes sense.
It kind of feels like we're doing the same strategy this year.