Jump to content

babulator

Community Member
  • Posts

    592
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by babulator

  1. Getting a 1st rd pick for him at this point would be highway robbery. If that's on the table we should take it and not look back. He's on the wrong side of his career and won't find a team with a better QB. All the best teams know when it's time to move on from these types of players. It's time, if the deal is there, jump on it.

    • Like (+1) 2
    • Agree 3
    • Thank you (+1) 1
  2. 3 minutes ago, GETTOTHE50 said:

    the big fast receivers that can jump high and catch make top dollar in FA. no way we can afford . getting a tall guy doesnt mean ***** if he doesnt have the other three qualities.

     

    were going to need to find a stud in the draft.

     

     

    Obviously I'm hoping Beane can land an Odunze, Legette, Mitchell or Franklin in the draft. I guess, thats really where my hopes are. Again, no qualms with this signing, he's solid and very game. We're still missing a size element imho.

  3. Good news! He's certainly a gamer, just wish we weren't so enamored with small WR's. With Diggs, Shakir and Samuel, at least half our WR room will be 6ft or under. No complaints with the signing just hoping for more size moving forward.

    • Like (+1) 1
  4. IDK I saw Taylor Lewan talking about how Henry does not like the zone block scheme, and likes the RPO even less. He wants to keep his shoulders square to the line and run down hill. He mentioned that the Ravens do both and he wasn't sure its a great fit for him. He mentioned Dallas would have been a better fit. I also believe he needs to dominate the ball to get cooking, I think it'll be interesting to see how this works out. I'm not sure it will pan out as great as they hope, age, scheme, new team etc...

    • Like (+1) 1
    • Agree 1
  5. 11 minutes ago, BBFL said:


    Honestly, I hope they acquire a guy that can play around 70%+ of the snaps and give Groot that chance too. 
     

    Better yet, I hope they are done with this whole mass rotation along the defensive line strategy. Just my 2 ¢. 

    You still need depth. I like Daquan think he's played well and would like to hang onto him. Idk what his asking price or market demand is though.

  6. 18 minutes ago, Ethan in Cleveland said:

    18M for a safety.  How the hell does that happen???

    Seriously these GMs are morons.

    Two first round picks for Adams??? 

    We certainly don't need to pay 18m for safety. I trust McD can get the most out of a lesser signing and make the most of it.

  7. QB2 isn't gonna win us a championship, if JA17 goes down so do our chances of winning it.

     

    That said, providing its a low end deal, he can come in and manage a game or two in a pinch. I don't hate this, and drafting someone here, now that won't get an opportunity to grow doesn't make a ton of sense. We need to use those picks elsewhere and keep/play them. This makes sense.

  8. Idk, it's kinda sad the way Tre's time ended here. At least we got the best and/or most out of Mitch and Jordan, I feel like Tre was peaking and got the double gut punch. Tre also brought a joy to the team and game that was evident from the other side of the screen, I'll miss that from him. I want the Bills to win as badly as the next guy, but I also want to do it with players that I like and are easy to root for. I'm a process guy and like high character individuals, all three will be missed.

  9. 1 minute ago, BuffaloBillyG said:

    Edwards in line to start with McGovern to C. Makes that Edwards contract a HUGE value at the moment.

    BBB playing 3D chess here. I like it ... the more I think about it, the more I like it.

  10. 19 minutes ago, NewEra said:

    Yes…..that’s what the term “scoring defense” means. Point given up.  🤦🏻‍♂️ 

     

    there’s so much oddity in this poast that i’ll just move on.  You clearly have no clue what you’re talking about.  
     

     

    When you're wrong and resort to name calling, moving on does seem best.

     

    (should have said personal attacks)

  11. 1 minute ago, Doc Brown said:

    That was before the Chiefs said ef that and won it with the #15 ranked offense and the #2 ranked defense.  Trends can change quickly.

    It's been a 5 year growing trend, but even before that the winners still had Top O's. Since the advent of fantasy football there's nothing that will change this trend moving forward. This is what the league wants, they've made every effort to emphasize the offense and minimize defenders ability. Just look @ scoring over the last decade compared to prior years. It's a trend that isn't changing any time soon. O > D in the modern NFL.

×
×
  • Create New...