OK. I think they'll be in 6 DBs plenty too, but...if Brown is the 3rd LB then Ragland coming off is not an issue.
So, you must believe that the 41st pick is too high for someone who may come off the field often. Do I finally get it?
Time for some deep breathing exercises all around.
commonsense & Scott Law...the general population understands your takes. No reason to keep coming back for more.
Gen pop...your position is well documented. You aren't going to change their opinions and they aren't going to change yours so drop it.
So...until pick 80 I don't expect to see any more back & forth.
Capisce?
That's not what I asked you. Do this...list the starting 11 as you see them. 3-4-4
Then add 1-2 DBs depending on your preference.
Now, tell me who you are pulling off the field. I don't see this as a concern.
Well, if a team goes hurry up it means they are stuck with the same personnel grouping that they had on second down. I'll take those odds.
On a "normal" third down how many front 7 do you want on the field? (how many DBs do you want on a passing down?)
Eisen mentioned a QB and Mayock quickly said no way.
No confidence in their abilities. Scared to see what becomes of the team under their tutelage.
At the same time, I cannot be unhappy with the talent that is being given to them.
Unless you know that Ragland would have been available at 49 then how can you say he fell to us? You preferred Ragland over Lawson or you thought Lawson would be gone by 19? If it's the latter you CANNOT be disappointed in how this draft has worked out.
2 4th round picks...BFD.
Whelp, if you want to believe Whaley they got the top 2 guys they were considering at 19. It was a position of need, they filled it.
Now...DT, WR, S and I'll feel more comfortable going into 2016.