Jump to content

The Frankish Reich

Community Member
  • Posts

    13,735
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by The Frankish Reich

  1. 1 hour ago, BillsFanNC said:

    And the "alt media" retracted the story within hours 

     

    How about Politico with the fake Hunter laptop story still up five years later?

     

    You're awful at this Finding.

     

    😂

     

    Now quick respond into the abyss. Go ahead.

    Retracted the story?

    Yeah, weeks after Kash Patel himself said they were barking up the wrong tree.

    And you waited until well after that before you changed the title of your libelous thread.

    • Agree 1
  2. 1 hour ago, B-Man said:

     

     

    NEW HOAX HAS BEEN RELEASED: 

     

    Here We Go Again: Media Claims J6 Pipe Bomber Was MAGA.

     

     

    The January 6 pipe bomber case was finally solved on Thursday, and the media reacted to it in the most predictable way possible. The suspect has been identified as 30-year-old Brian Cole Jr. of Virginia.

     

    It was reported Thursday evening that Cole comes from a family deeply entrenched in left-wing activism.

     

    Weeks before the alleged bombings, Cole worked for his father’s bail bond company, which specialized in freeing illegal immigrants and even sued the Trump administration’s DHS over immigration enforcement.

     

    But on Friday morning, the mainstream media started pushing the narrative that Cole is a Trump supporter who “believed conspiracy theories about the 2020 election.”

    Related: The J6 Pipe Bomber Story Is About to Get Memory-Holed. Here’s Why

     

    “The man charged with planting two pipe bombs near the Democratic and Republican party headquarters on the eve of the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol told the FBI he believed conspiracy theories about the 2020 election, according to two people familiar with the matter,” NBC News reported. “Brian Cole Jr., 30, is cooperating with the FBI, NBC News has reported, citing a separate person familiar with the matter. Cole is expected to make his first court appearance on Friday.”

     

    In September, a similar situation occurred after Charlie Kirk’s assassination. The media attempted to suggest that Kirk’s killer was a MAGA supporter. MSNBC’s Matthew Dowd infamously proposed the absurd idea that it might have been a “supporter shooting their gun off in celebration,” which led to his dismissal from the network. There were even claims that the man who attempted to assassinate President Trump last year was a supporter.

     

    As it stands, the narrative that Cole was a Trump supporter rests entirely on anonymous sources. Considering the Daily Wire’s reporting on Cole’s history — his family’s deep ties to left-wing activism, his work with immigration-bond companies, and his litigation against the Trump administration — it’s reasonable to question both the credibility of these claims and potentially Cole’s own statements to investigators.

     

    If Cole had been buying bomb-making parts back in May 2019, well before the election, the election itself likely wasn’t the motive. Ultimately, it’s been just a day since the arrest, and there is likely more information we don’t yet know than we do.

     

    But one thing we do know is that we’ve seen this happen too many times in the past, where the media desperately tries to pin political violence on the right, and sadly, those false narratives tend to catch on before they are debunked.

     

    https://pjmedia.com/matt-margolis/2025/12/05/here-we-go-again-media-claims-j6-pipe-bomber-was-maga-n4946741

    Keep digging.

     

    Two weeks ago: it was an inside job! And the "pipe bomber" now works for an Intel agency!!

    Yesterday: he was Antifa! See, we told you!!

    Today: OK, we were wrong twice, but now we've hit on it!

    • Thank you (+1) 1
  3. On 11/4/2025 at 6:11 AM, sherpa said:

     

    Because the US thinks that Maduro is directly involved in drug trafficking to the US.

    One of his relatives was arrested and convicted but eventually released on drug trafficking charges.

     

    The US, to my knowledge, has not directly tied the Colombian or Mexican political administrations to direct trafficking.  

    @sherpa, I've been waiting for you to weigh-in on some of these issues, legal, strategic, tactical. I trust your knowledge here.

     

    Legal: I'll leave the basis for the strikes in general to the lawyers. But what about the "two tap" subsequent bombing of the survivors? 

     

    Strategic/Tactical: I confess ignorance here. I had to do some digging. Tell me if I'm wrong about any of the following:

     

    - the boats are shipping cocaine, not fentanyl

    - the boats are headed to some non-US trans-shipment point; they lack the practical range to make it to the US coastline uninterrupted

    - the Coast Guard generally intercepts such boats

  4. 1 hour ago, JDHillFan said:

    It’s necessary to revert in order to point out your Karen-ish hypocrisy. You’ve shown that you are happy to be lied to provided it’s your favored people doing the lying. 
     

    What was with the idiotic J Kelly bit?


     

     

    Wrong thread.

    Julie was kind of the Patient Zero in publicizing the truly asinine "inside job" pipe bomber theory. I trust you can find her in her usual rat hole.

  5. 44 minutes ago, 5ths the charm said:

    So does McClappy

    LOL is overdone, but I literally laughed out loud when I read this!

    11 minutes ago, RochesterLifer said:

    You reveal your underdeveloped mind with that "McClappy crap."

    Yeah, but you gotta admit he does have a high motor. Doesn't take plays off. Claps to the whistle.

    • Haha (+1) 1
  6. 3 minutes ago, JDHillFan said:

    You made excuses for Kamala when she flip flopped on every position she ever held - to the point of saying if anyone wants to know her positions just read the party platform. You also happily bought in on the “cheap fake” lies. What on earth are you doing here?

     

    What was with the Julie Kelly “4 days” bit yesterday? 

    Always good when you guys revert to the what about Kamala or Joe or Hillary line.

    I don't like being lied to. I don't care by whom.

    This is an epic lie, somehow tying these Venezuelan cocaine boats, headed to some non-US trans-shipment point, to the fentanyl crisis.

    • Like (+1) 1
  7. On 11/5/2022 at 9:03 AM, BillsFanNC said:

    More questions. I'm sure all will be answered in the select committees report even if the FBI can't get to the bottom of it.

     

    And geofence warrants? I thought geofencing technology was something made up by a grifter documentarian?

     

    All so confusing.

     

     

    Just a reminder of How It Started, How It's Going.

    Febrile fantasies of Julie Kelly and her bottom, NC Bills Fan.

    • Thank you (+1) 1
  8. OK, I'll admit it. I had watched (well, speed watched, wearing out the FF button) the 2 Chiefs themed movies last year.

    My wife and daughter like Hallmark Christmas movies. Kind of comfort food for the holidays for them, so I've seen bits and pieces of a lot of them.

    Based on my embarrassing familiarity with the genre, here's my Graded on a Curve, genre-specific scores:

     

    1. Chiefs LIFETIME (not Hallmark) movie: 7 our of 10. They didn't have access to Chiefs regalia or Chiefs player cameos, etc. Lifetime seems a little racier than Hallmark. They're definitely doing more than a final kiss. Pretty decent for the genre. Not eyerolling Chiefs worship.

     

    2. Bills movie: 4. Pretty cringe at times, but still kept the pace going. Player cameos fun for Bills fans, pretty innocuous for non-Bills female audiences as far as I can tell. Wife and daughter sat through this one with me. If it hadn't been Bills, they might not have sat it out, but still, o.k.

     

    3. Chiefs Hallmark movie: 0. Awful. This is the one with Travis Kelce's mom, which alone is enough to drop it a couple points. Awful plot - they didn't want it to get uncomfortably close to real life Travis loves Taylor, so the love interest is ... a Chiefs office worker? What? That's gonna get the female viewers all hot and bothered? Just unwatchable for anyone but a hardcore Chiefs fan, or your hardcore Hallmark movie reviewer (I watch so you don't have to). Disgusting Chiefs hagiography; basically a Chiefs fanfic, but by a really untalented screenwriter. Avoid at all costs.

     

    You're welcome.

  9. 2 minutes ago, B-Man said:

     

     

    Mark Kelly's Heroic Battle Against Trump Silencing Him Goes REALLY Wrong

    As X Points Out He Won't Shut Up

     

    ce66b380-cb9f-4931-871b-2f56792e63e2-105

     

     

    Raise your hand if you've muted the words 'Mark Kelly' on X and maybe even on all social media sites. Holy COW this guy loves the sound of his own voice ... 

     

    We've never seen someone whom Trump is supposedly silencing blather on so damn much in all the time we've been covering the Democrats. Almost as if Kelly is full of crap and Trump is fine if he keeps making a fool of himself.

     

    Seriously, even the dumbest of his supporters has to know that if Trump truly were threatening Kelly and silencing him, he wouldn't be on every single Sunday show, making videos, and posting on social endlessly.

     

    Then again ... it is the Democrats we're talking about.

     

    https://twitchy.com/samj/2025/12/05/mark-kelly-unflinching-blah-blah-blah-n2422481

    To defeat the enemy you must become the enemy.

     

    So who do you think Trump/Vance fear the most in 2028?

    Newsom: glib, good looking, but they'll hang California around his neck

    Beshear: yeah, the classic candidate who looks good on paper (red state Dem!) with a personality deficit he can't overcome

    AOC: she'd get traction in Dem primaries but never in a national election. Almost too easy.

    Kelly: weird looking, not glib, which strangely adds a note of seriousness, performs well in a purple state, makes Vance or whoever look like he belongs at the kid's table. Odd candidate for a national election, but (as we're seeing) smarter at playing the political game than he looks

     

  10. 1 hour ago, muppy said:

    The fact this crime could have been solved earlier kind of sucks.  A fresh set of eyes  rediscovered links and it was solved. That's a good thing

    Sounds like this is right.

    I will say people think this is far easier than it is in real life. All those police procedural dramas, etc.

    Bondi said it herself: a needle in a haystack investigation.

    I was never out there pounding the pavement or compiling spreadsheets of license plate numbers. But I worked with agents who were doing that, and sometimes you keep digging, digging, digging until you have enough information to get a search warrant, and then the search blows the case wide open. Sometimes the feds have someone on the radar but not enough to make an arrest, so they hang back and watch and keep working the case to get that information to make the arrest.

    Kash Patel's scolding of the people who named the wrong person suggests exactly that - barking up the wrong tree here did nothing to advance the investigation and may have hindered it.

    • Thank you (+1) 1
  11. 15 minutes ago, Orlando Buffalo said:

     

    Perhaps you should look to see why you are so easily misled. You truly believed something that had no evidence at the begining but now you are calling the wrong people the conspiracy theorists. 

    What?

    I truly believed that someone left two pipe bombs near the Capitol on the night of January 5.

    I never believed stupid conspiracy theories that it was an "inside job."

    As of tonight, my instincts have been proven sound on both counts.

×
×
  • Create New...