Jump to content

Big Blitz

Community Member
  • Posts

    18,486
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Big Blitz

  1. 12 personnel bay bay!!
  2. Taking away their embarrassing loss to the Bills, the combined record of Dolphins opponents is 5 wins 23 losses.
  3. He’s deliberately trying to be misleading. I’m not sure he even knows the subject matter of the topic - Biden colluded with Big Tech to suppress the “conspiracy theorists” about Covid - which was essentially political opposition. Low info Bill and any other low info leftist trash likely knows this - that’s why he’s trying to derail the thread with his usual “but Trump sucks” garbage.
  4. This is not the same you really are a freaking moron. Somehow……Trump.
  5. We support free speech just the speech we approve of. We will work to make sure our version of acceptable speech will be enforced by the private sector.
  6. A federal appellate court concluded Sept. 8 that multiple White House, surgeon general, FBI and CDC officials likely breached the fine line separating permissible government persuasion and jawboning from illicit “coercion and significant encouragement” when they repeatedly — and often successfully — lobbied social-media companies “to remove disfavored content and accounts from their sites.” In short, acts of “coerced censorship” by the platforms since early 2021 are now attributable to the federal government. This allows First Amendment free speech claims filed by Missouri, Louisiana and several individuals to proceed against officials like Surgeon General Vivek H. Murthy and White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre. The government targeted for suppression views and alleged misinformation that didn’t comport with its stance on contentious topics like the COVID-19 lab-leak theory and the efficacy of pandemic lockdowns and vaccines. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit’s ruling in Missouri v. Biden temporarily bars the officials from “coerc[ing] or significantly encourag[ing] social-media companies to remove, delete, suppress, or reduce … posted social-media content containing protected free speech.” The court delayed the ban for 10 days, giving the government a chance to file an emergency appeal with the U.S. Supreme Court. Stepping back from legal nuances such as what “significant encouragement” means (the Fifth Circuit said it’s when the government “exercise[s] some active, meaningful control over the private party’s decision”), Missouri v. Biden raises two larger points. The first is that the Supreme Court now has its hands full sorting out vital First Amendment issues affecting social-media platforms, while the second is that free-speech issues affecting the platforms are firmly entwined with the country’s political polarization. Regarding the court’s internet agenda, the justices will hear arguments on Oct. 31 in two cases: Lindke v. Freed and O’Connor-Ratcliff v. Garnier. Both involve First Amendment claims against government officials who blocked citizens from following them on the officials’ personal social-media accounts. The court will address the threshold state-action question: When is an official’s ostensibly private account sufficiently used for and related to his government position and activities, like communicating with constituents, that it should be treated as a government account and trigger First Amendment concerns? I asserted in The Hill in May, shortly after the court agreed to hear the cases, that “the realities of today’s communication environment necessitate affording a citizen broad First Amendment rights, unless officials use their social media accounts in a purely private-citizen manner that is devoid of job-related content and trappings.” Furthermore, the court will likely soon agree to examine two cases — one from Florida, one from Texas — involving statutes that interfere with the editorial control and autonomy of large social-media platforms over their content-moderation practices regarding the content they host and where they host it. These two NetChoice cases (a trade association challenging both measures) carry the potential to finally give social-media platforms the same First Amendment rights over content that the court bestowed on print newspapers nearly 50 years ago in Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. Tornillo. https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/4198285-missouri-v-biden-and-the-crossroads-of-politics-censorship-and-free-speech/amp/
  7. He just doesn’t play well with fans in the stands.
  8. Millennials have destroyed this country. Gen Z is going to be even worse. We went from 2 genders to 87 in less then a decade. We can go from Republic to police state in much quicker time. When everyone is broke and hungry, the revolution won’t be to expand free markets or limit DCs control over your life.
  9. “The globalists” are ready to move on from you to AI, the internet, or robots or anything that isn’t going to cost them or do to ruin their bottom lines - that’s what’s coming. It’s been full speed ahead since your Shamdemic. You will own nothing and be happy You will eat the bugz
  10. Google needs to be Elon’d
  11. That one ridiculous game Harty has. Like the game McKenzie had against them in 2021.
  12. DFS Stevenson
  13. In fantasy I told some guys in my league Stevenson is the start of the week.
  14. Sticking to my prediction. The Jags will be the 1 seed in the AFC Their defense is grossly underrated.
  15. Anticipating and waiting in complete and total fear of economic Armageddon which is the logical conclusion of everything that has gone wrong.
  16. I have no idea why they are pushing for WWIII. GEICO laying off 2,000 employees nationwide, 5.5% of Buffalo area workforce impacted https://www.wkbw.com/news/local-news/geico-laying-off-2-000-employees-nationwide-5-5-of-buffalo-area-workforce-impacted They’ve (the globalists) have shrunk everything they can as prices continue to skyrocket. You can’t afford anything. You Branch Covidians are the first generation in human history that will NOT leave this world to their kids (they won’t be having any so there’s that) a better place to live in. Nice work all around give yourselves a great big virtual pat on the back.
  17. Well I guess that’s my issue than. We can’t have at one time our weapons on the field if we pass be a rookie TE, Knox, whatever RB we throw out there that the D will gladly let us check down to, and then Davis. Then the 3 wide sets become Harty or Shakir. We need another WR if Gabe ain’t it. Or, you need to find a great slot guy that finally adequately replaces what Beasely gave us.
  18. There is something off about this move to more 12 personnel and how it came about. You didn’t really hear anything about it being a focus in 2022 for Dorsey in year 1 unless I missed something. But then we drafted Kincaid as if this was the justification we needed to go to 12. If we had Amon-Ra St. Brown on this team would we be running 12? Or shoot even Josh Downs or Tank Dell. More importantly, does this fit what Josh does best which is big plays and throws down field no one else can make. If we want to be a PA team under center a lot more I get it but we aren’t. So are we justifying Kincaid or are we truly believers in 12 personnel as the base of our offense. Because I think with THIS Oline the O we were running pre Dorsey is the O we would want. Of course I just think that O needed a great to elite RB and we would have been lights out but I’ll bring up Breece Hall again some other time.
  19. Should we have just drafted Tank Dell or Josh Downs? To get that slot guy for Josh. I’m sure Kincaid is going to be good - but I’m not sure the 2 TE set is good for Josh Allen and what we’ve built before Dorsey wanted to change the scheme. That’s my current issue. I like the idea - but why? The Chiefs can do it because they have Kelce. Knox isn’t scaring anyone. Kincaid is a rookie TE - those always struggle. So 2 of the weapons on the field Knox and Kincaid and the 3rd is sometimes Murray - That leaves Davis and Diggs. Opposing defenses are not trembling over this. They can cover Knox and Kincaid - who will do rookie things and sometimes do good things. Sorry but this team needs to get shorter weapon asap. Its starting to make sense why we are struggling to find consistency and an identity. Round holes square pegs. And one of those might be Dorsey.
  20. It dawned on me watching Dallas with their injuries that our defense should still be better then competent with the D line we have. No excuses. No feeling sorry for ourselves. No worrying about the schedule. Just win. Get healthy. Get in. Get hot at the right time. I’ll take my chances vs anyone anywhere.
  21. There are 11 games still to be played. The Chargers have 12 games left - they probably have to win 9 to get in. It’s possible but if they lose to KC twice…nope. They absolutely have to beat us now. The AFC North is going to beat the hell out of each other. Cleveland and the Texans are getting annoying - talk about defense catching up with offense look at the Texans, Browns and Steelers - each .500 or better.
  22. “He’s headed for the Hall of Fame!” —Adam Schefter, offering serious commentary in 2020.
  23. Parsons landed on him with all his weight lol the rules are laughable but whatever. Good job Dallas.
×
×
  • Create New...