Jump to content

BLeonard

Community Member
  • Posts

    217
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by BLeonard

  1. 6 minutes ago, cle23 said:

     

    What does that accomplish though?  If Buffalo and Cinci end up as the 2 and 3, then one team gets a bye and the other doesn't?  And now add another playoff team for the AFC but not the NFC?  

    Wouldn't work anyway.  Giving two teams a bye means 6 teams play each other, producing 3 winners.  That means 5 teams in the divisional round.  You'd have another team getting a bye somehow.

    • Like (+1) 1
  2. 6 minutes ago, Warriorspikes51 said:

    If the Bills play Thursday and then Monday,  the league could consider giving the 2 seed a bye and allowing an 8th team into AFC playoffs 

     

    Seen a lot of this thought, too.  But, here's the thing:  You'd have 3 games (6 teams) playing on WC Weekend.  Of that, there would be 3 winners.  Add in the two bye teams and you have 5 teams.

     

    Some team would then have to have another bye, cause you can't have a game with one or three teams.

     

    I don't see how adding a team and a bye is a solution.

  3. 9 minutes ago, BRH said:

    I haven't read all the suggestions, but my son just said this:

     

    - Don't play this game.

    - Cancel the KC-Raiders game next Sunday because the Raiders are out of the playoffs and KC has already won their division.

    - Let Cincinnati and Buffalo play their games because they involve a division title (in Cincinnati/Baltimore's case) and a playoff berth (in New England's case).

     

    No playoff games are eliminated or moved.

     

    I kind of like it.  It's completely unfair to give KC the 1 seed outright because of this game being canceled.  KC already played their game this week and won.  Let Cincinnati and Buffalo have their games next week.  Then all three teams have played 16 games and the 1 seed/bye can be more fairly decided.

    It's not a bad solution on the face, but without the Bills/Bengals result, the Ravens cant' win the North even if they beat Cincy.  Baltimore would be 11-6, while Cincy would be 11-5.

     

    On top of that, I highly doubt they cancel the Chiefs/Raiders game, especially since it's the first game Saturday.  It's also not meaningless for fans that bought tickets and made plans to attend.

     

    Any way you slice it, some team somewhere is gonna get the short end of the stick.  I just don't see a way to avoid it.

     

    At this point, the easiest way that I'm seeing is to just not play BUF/CIN and play week 18 as scheduled.  If KC beats the Raiders, they'd be the #1 based on win %, essentially punishing the Bills.  If the Bills win, they'd be the #2, essentially punishing CIN.  Baltimore gets a bit of a punishment by not having a chance to win the division, but they're still in the playoffs at least.  KC would be rewarded, but every other team involved remains unaffected.

     

    Again, really no way to avoid a scenario that is fair to everyone and doesn't affect a number of teams, but at this point, it may be the way to minimize the fallout.

    • Agree 2
  4. Just now, boyst said:

    I'm saying if the game isn't played. Which I don't expect it to be. 

    If the Bills/Bengals game isn't played, the Bills are 12-3.  Beat the Patriots and they're 13-3.

    Chiefs lose to the Raiders, they're 13-4.  In what world would KC get the 1 seed there?  If KC loses to the Raiders, the Bills could even forfeit the Bengals game and still have the tiebreaker on KC.

  5. AFC is a bit more complicated than the NFC, as the AFC has no seeds locked in, while the NFC has two.

     

    Here are the teams that can still win each particular seed:

     

    AFC

    1 - BUF, KC, CIN
    2 - BUF, KC, CIN
    3 - BUF, KC, CIN, BLT
    4 - JAX, TEN
    5 - CIN, LAC, BLT
    6 - CIN, LAC, BLT
    7 - JAX, NE, MIA, PIT

     

    If the Bills win on MNF, the Bills and Chiefs can't be the 3 seed and Cincinnati can't be the 1 or 2 seed.

    If the Bengals win on MNF, the Ravens can't be the 3 seed.

     

    NFC

    1 - PHI, SF, DAL
    2 - PHI, SF, MIN, DAL
    3 - SF, MIN
    4 - TB
    5 - PHI, DAL
    6 - NYG
    7 - SEA, DET, GB

     

    In the NFC, the NY Giants will go to either SF or MIN, while Tampa Bay will host either PHI or DAL in the Wild Card Round.

    • Like (+1) 2
  6. 5 hours ago, JerseyBills said:

    I'm waiting on the same thing. If it's any time but late night Sun or Mon night , my Jets buddy will drive out from Jersey for my 1st Bill's gm at OP this year

     

    Saw them in Jersey vs the Jests

     

    Unless we win and KC loses and it's a meaningless game

     

    It won't be Monday Night.  There is no MNF the last week of the season.

    • Like (+1) 1
  7. 8 minutes ago, chongli said:

     

    Yeah we need to beat Cincy. But if we lost, Cincy could still lose to Baltimore Week 18 and KC would need to lose of its final two games. Then we would still be the number one seed (assuming we bet New England in the finale).

    KC would only need to lose one of its two games, not both.

     

    Furthermore, if Denver somehow beats KC on Sunday (don't see it happening, but any given Sunday) the Bills could clinch the #1 seed with a win against Cincy on MNF.

     

    Baltimore could still win the AFC North, too, who the Bills have a tiebreaker over, so they could play a factor in final seeding, too.

    • Like (+1) 1
  8. As others have said, Cincy would get the #1 if all three teams are tied and the Bengals beat the Bills.

     

    The easy way to look at it is, if the Bills beat Cincinnati, they clinch no lower than the #2 seed.  The game against New England would then be for the #1 seed, regardless of what KC and Cincinnati do.

     

    The good news is, even if the Bills lose to Cincinnati, they can still get the #1 seed with a win over NE and losses by KC (@ LV) and Cin (vs BLT) in Week 18.  Even a loss by either team would give the Bills the #2 seed.

    • Like (+1) 1
  9. I can only speak for my experiences in Indianapolis.  While I expected (and even gave) some back-and-forth ribbing, I didn't expect to have a few people throwing concession items (one being a half-eaten pretzel) at me after the game ended.  I certainly didn't expect to have a fan using the urinal next to me during halftime "accidentally" piss on my lower leg and shoe, either.  Both of these happened during and after the 10/20/97 MNF classic that the Bills won 9-6.

     

    In fairness, though, I've been to see a few Bills/Colts games in Indy and this one was really the only time I had any issues.  Guess I just had some bad luck wearing the wrong colors around the wrong fans on that particular night.

     

    I also went to the Browns/Bills "Home" game in Detroit.  While obviously not the same as a true road game, we had zero issues with Browns fans there.  Very fun back-and-forth was all.  In fact, probably the worst behavior we saw was a Bills fan in one of the stores by the stadium very upset that they (a Detroit store) didn't have the Bills gear HE wanted.  On his way out, he punched the glass door open and I'm a bit surprised it didn't break.

     

    So, long story short, of all the times I've been to Bills games outside of Orchard Park, with the exception of one, everything was pretty much fine.

    • Like (+1) 1
  10. 19 minutes ago, JayBaller10 said:

    I’ve only been to the stadium 3 times, but heard it the last two times I was there, like some sort of anthem. 

    FWIW, they played it before the kickoffs when the Bills "hosted" the Browns in Detroit, too.  Guessing it's part of the home "routine," as they played the touchdown song and then the Shout song after each PAT.

     

     

    • Like (+1) 1
  11. 21 minutes ago, GolfandBills said:

    It’s not true.  Bills can say no heaters.  It’s up to the home team 

    The way I understand it is, if the home team has something, they must also provide for the visiting team.  But, the visiting team may bring their own equipment to use if they so desire:  https://www.sportingnews.com/us/nfl/news/washington-cowboys-benches/fp2c9zeq3jzm1m7m5iqkl6dn2

     

    Which means, the Bills could have brought and used their own canopies, mist fans, etc.  Maybe they didn't bring enough?  Or thought that Miami would supply them and were surprised when they didn't use theirs, meaning they didn't have to supply for the Bills?

     

    I don't know the exact answer, but according to this article, a team seems to be allowed to have whatever they want on their sideline, if they pack their own:  https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-environment/2022/11/14/dolphins-hard-rock-sun-shade/

     

    "The Vikings staff took numerous steps to help the players fight the heat, placing an emphasis on hydration and administering IV treatment, while installing air-conditioned benches and sun shades."

     

    So, if the Vikings could bring their own, why couldn't the Bills?  Or, again, did the Bills just not prepare or bring enough?

    • Like (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...