Andrew Son

Maybe so. I didn't think he lived up to the hype leading up to the combine, maybe I'm putting too much on the 40. It's a very deep TE class. I'm pretty sure we grab one in the middle rounds.

He looks like such an instinctive playmaker... Can he even play corner with that timed speed? Don't see it with him. Thought he needed better numbers at the combine due to his level of competition.

Very similar to Rex, who would often wake at 5am for M&M's.

This is my guy in the second. Amazing hands

Stupid waste of time. Just win, that is all that matters.

Just trying to get to the bottom of Ryan's analysis. It's a complex web

Interesting. So now the key to winning is fewer passing yards because you are ahead and running out the clock? I guess Brady had even fewer yards then?

Where did the Dakster end up on your all important yardage ranking?

+1,000,000 Cover1 is a valued contributor providing much needed football content.

As long as he doesn't light it anywhere near Dareus

Mr. Womble is current living his 15 minutes of fame

What scares me about Williams is that he seems almost too tall. Looks like it hurts his suddenness and his ability to get in and out of breaks. Very competitive, strong hands though. Can really go up and get it. Would certainly be a nice peice to have.

I don't see it. Sammy is just so, so talented. A special talent. I like Williams, but I don't see any where near the level of overall ability.

I don't believe anyone that studies tape would say that Williams would be the number one over Watkins.

Jesus, CB's dropping like flies...

IDK, that combo is a little "light" for me

I'm not sure the fit for MIami. Too similar to Kiko, IMO

Thanks. Conley is a plus intangibles guy too, right? Team captain? I'm starting to think he is an option at 10... I can just hear the outrage at selecting the 2nd best CB on his own college team at 10

Please show me where I said that. Look, if you are going to post an opinion please be prepared to back it up. It's not too much to ask, this is a discussion board after all.

Ok, one more try... I don't think you know how this works. YOU made the claim that he doesn't tackle. You did.. got it? OK, Good. Then, I made the counter point that he was second in the league in tackles. Tackles are a statistic. Being second in the league in tackles might lead one to believe that said player is a good tackler, and that it might be a ridiculous assumption to say that they had a "no tackling clause" in their contract. Now, given the details of our conversation above, who would be responsible for providing backup proving that he is a poor tackler?

I expected a response backing up your assertion that the second leading tackler in the league had a "no tackling" clause in his contract.

What on earth are you talking about? You posted that he had a "no tackling" clause in his contract. I simply pointed out that he was second in the league in tackles. You know, a stat. Then you started asking me questions. Maybe you should have some facts to back up your assertions.

So you want me to do the research to backup your assertion? What else could I lookup for you?

Why are you asking me?

Holy crow, they're everywhere! Second in the league in tackles