Jump to content

Orlando Buffalo

Community Member
  • Posts

    8,780
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Orlando Buffalo

  1. 53 minutes ago, PromoTheRobot said:

     

    I think the fan base is jonesing for "sugar high" Josh when the Bills are only using a portion of their playbook to win games. They are saving stuff for later, maybe even until the playoffs. There are no fantasy points in the NFL.

    I agree and I am also jonesing for Sugar High Josh, so I am very conflicted. 

  2. 6 minutes ago, 4th&long said:

    You can't be this *****en stupid. Please! Why would Kimmel tell you what the show brings in. ABC never said it was cancled permanently yet (that I have heard about anyway. And I didn't look up what everyone else makes. I'm sure it's not a fraction of what Kimmel makes. Google Ai did say that it is hard to Calcutta exactly what the show made before it spit out those numbers at me. 

     

    I laugh at you guys, you hate Kimmel so bad it eats you up. I hate fox news and I don't turn it on in my house. End of story. I didn't start threads and celebrate the judgements against them. I laughed and that was about it. I didn't like Charlie Kirk so I never listened to him. It's very simple, you won't find one thing bad I said on here about him. You won't find much bad, If anything I said about any right wing commentator. 

     

    I get that you guys don't like Kimmel. I have watched his show for years. I'm not into all the commenting on trump it's every night and the most of not all of his opening monolog. It gets old and you know I can't stand trump. 

     

    But wise up, don't give up free speech because you hate someone. How in the hell did you get to be a school teacher? Book smart but no common sense! 

    I presented facts and you get emotional. His competition cost $100 million, you said Kimmels show made 70 million in ad sales. If what you said is  true, just to break even he would have to be doing his show at a 30% discount vs his competition. As for your belief that my comments have any emotion, I don't care about Kimmel, and the only reason you assume otherwise is that you are defined by one emotion after the other.

    • Like (+1) 1
  3. 4 minutes ago, 4th&long said:

    We are not talking about Colbert. Keep up. If they cancled the show because it was losing money they would have said so, it would save Disney a lot of trouble. Lots of people canceling Disney+ right now. Money talks. Hahahahahahahahahahahaha sorry sucker. Your hatred caused you to give up your rights. 

     

    Two questions for then, why is Kimmel not showing us how much money his show makes? And why is Disney not replacing it with a like type show? I will point out that your pushing the concept that Kimmel was the only person being paid on his show proved again how proud you are to remain ignorant. 

     

  4. 10 minutes ago, 4th&long said:

    No. A Google Ai search said the show brings in $70 million in ad revenue a year and Kimmel makes $16 million a year. I'd say both are doing good. Again you listen to that liar trump and that network that had a $767 million judgements against it for lying. 

    Colbert cost over $100 million to produce so unless Jimmy was paying a 30% discount across the board compared to Colbert the show was losing money. The host is only a small percent of total cost. 

  5. This thread is about the 20th this month that is just Democrats showing how gullible they are to obvious lies. @Joe Ferguson forever, @4th&long, @Homelander @Trump_is_Mentally_fit all post crap without even giving it a second thought if it might be untrue. The funniest part is they will accuse of me of believing whatever Trump tells me when I literally never post anything he says directly, because he is a politician. 

    • Haha (+1) 1
    • Thank you (+1) 1
  6. 40 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

    Wrong.  All the way around.  Nice insults, by the way.  You can always tell who has lost the argument when the insults arrive on scene. 

    Dude 90% of what you throw at me is name calling from the start, so while that is true for you, not everyone is stunted as you. 

  7. 2 hours ago, Trump_is_Mentally_fit said:

    You either tow the line or you are done. The not so slow road to fascism here. 

     

     

    The hilarity of this post, Disney has been losing money on the show for years but kept thinking they could turn it around. They gave up hope when he decided to lie and insult half the country but you think it should be kept on because you agree with his beliefs. You truly are the fascist, believing a capitalist company should lose money to keep your childish thoughts happy.

  8. 28 minutes ago, Roundybout said:


    What do you think this means?


     

    “We are going to channel all of the anger that we have over the organized campaign that led to this assassination to uproot and dismantle these terrorist networks," Miller said as he joined Vance on a livestream as the vice president hosted "The Charlie Kirk Show" to pay tribute to the late conservative activist.”

     

    https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2025/09/15/trump-plans-crackdown-on-left-wing-groups-after-charlie-kirk-shooting/86166121007/

     

    I am not sure what you are arguing. Do you believe that Terrorist groups should be allowed to flourish in our country? Do you think all liberals are terrorists? Or are you assuming Trump will use the FBI like Biden was when he investigated the PTA mom's for being against gender ideology? 

    • Like (+1) 2
  9. 1 hour ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

     

    33 minutes ago, 4th&long said:

    Didn't even look at it. Don't need to look at the to know you are idiots. 

    So both of your points is that you believe the statement was presented fairly. I can't prove to you otherwise because you literally won't even look at it, preferring to attack me.

  10. 1 minute ago, Roundybout said:


    I think the prevailing notion among liberals like me is “I’m horrified he was shot. I disagreed with him on every issue.” 
     

    And possibly, but that’s by default. Assassinations don’t really happen anymore here.

    so the person on my timeline who said "Having a fourth martini in honor of Charlie" is certainly a horrible person and should be ashamed of himself? 

  11. 4 hours ago, Roundybout said:


     

    There is no reason whatsoever to lower flags for Kirk. I’m sorry, that’s reserved for military and elected officials. 
     

    He was a podcaster who made “epic liberal owned” YouTube compilations and was beginning to dabble in white supremacy, something you still refuse to acknowledge. 
     

    He was a meme more than five years ago because of his stupid “argument” style. 
     

    He is a footnote in history. No one talks about Rush Limbaugh anymore and he was 10 times more influential than Kirk was. 
     

    I’m deeply sorry for his family that he was killed. But the response to this has been absolutely insane. 

    If what you are saying is true then he would not have been assassinated. The only bigger assassinations in the US in the past 75 years are RFK and MLK, and you know it is true because of how happy so many liberals are that he is dead. If he was not important then no one would be cheering his death. 

    • Like (+1) 1
  12. 8 hours ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

    I think Orlando is already there but no one should be. 

    And this explains why you are always wrong. I have stated at least 3 times in this short topic that I don't agree with Kilmeade but you are so hateful that you lie again. Truly pathetic for you. 

  13. 18 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

    Why must you bald faced lie to push your position?  you might want to reassess that or at least stop overtly lying.  From your link:

     

    Jones was talking on "Fox & Friends" on Wednesday about public money spent on trying to help homeless people and suggested that those who didn't accept services offered to them should be jailed.

    "Or involuntary lethal injection, or something," Kilmeade said. "Just kill 'em."

    You can keep going this way, but it is a misrepresentation of the topic. The discussion was about a murderer who had been released 15 times, making comments like this without context is irresponsible when we know that liberals are attacking and murdering people who disagree with them. 

  14. 6 minutes ago, Taro T said:

     

    Wadr, not missing your point at all.  You are saying one "humanely" rendered act of insanity is better than another act of insanity (or evilness or stupidity or whatever it was that describes that judge's decision to release him essentially on his own recognizance).  

     

    Will not agree that it is better, again wadr.  IMHO it's like being asked to choose whether it's better to die in a fiery autocrash or merely a severely violent autocrash.  At the end of the consideration, neither is a good option.

    You are missing the point, maybe intentionally, one idea was thrown out flippantly on TV  and few people agreed with it, the other is the policy we are currently running with in liberal cities right now. 

×
×
  • Create New...