Jump to content

Orlando Buffalo

Community Member
  • Posts

    8,716
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Orlando Buffalo

  1. 2 minutes ago, Mikie2times said:

    It's always insults, bad sentences, and things that can't be proven. Oddly enough, usually in that order. 

    You use data that is garbage to make a point that makes no sense. To believe Latinos legally in the country are more prone to violence than Latinos who broke the law in order to be here is dumb. I can recognize patterns and know when I am being told something that makes no sense. 

  2. 43 minutes ago, Mikie2times said:

    I don't think people can "hide" a murder charge in the state of Texas. Nor do I think Texas is exactly friendly towards illegals. Yet the Homicide rates for illegals are 26% lower than US born citizens and 61% lower for legal non US born citizens. This isn't a hard exercise. The US has highest murder rate of any G7 country the last 3 years. People who aren't born here don't have the affinity for violence the natives do. Go figure. 

     

    https://www.cato.org/policy-analysis/illegal-immigrant-murderers-texas-2013-2022

    image.thumb.png.cb8e962cb3d6b9731b5b10492b66bbfa.png

    You are so dumb you think an illegal murderer is just as likely to be convicted as a native born murderer? We as a country have a 40% clearance rate for violent crime, and the clearance rate is worst in areas with large illegal immigrant populations, but I live in an area with a large population of legal immigrants and they want to keep our the illegals more than anyone else I know but I am sure they are just racist. 

  3. 2 hours ago, Mikie2times said:

    I don't call them illegal alien foreign invaders because that's not what I call them. You can call them whatever you want.

     

    I take it from your response they haven't directly impacted you either? I can also post a story about a shark attack or a plane crash. Should we no longer swim in the ocean or fly?

     

    It's statistically proven immigrants commit crimes at lower rates than US born citiczens. https://www.nber.org/papers/w31440 

     

    I'm not debating they should be here. I'm laughing at you over your outrage for something that you will never feel. 

     

    It is always funny to me when someone pulls out a stat like "illegals commit less crimes" when anyone with any concept of logic or intelligence knows that is not true. The only reason these stats exist in this form is LA, and probably all sanctuary cities, do not count any crime as being committed by an illegal alien. It is the same reason not one transgender person ever committed a crime prior to 2016, no one counted it. But since I am certain you believe this can you give me a reason why so many murder rates are dropping this year around the country in cities with high illegal immigrants rates? 

    • Thank you (+1) 1
  4. 11 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:

    I'm pointing out that a method of analysis - that some types of speech are akin to actual violence - is now so ingrained that it is being used by the right as well as the left.

    The appropriate response to stultifying left orthodoxy in higher education is not to try to try to impose stultifying right orthodoxy. But that's what's happening, because this is all about settling scores and not about intellectual freedom.

    Threatening someones life is not protected speech. Calling someone names, insulting their intelligence, and their group identity is protected. The fact that you are trying to act like there is not an obvious difference is sad to me. 

  5. 19 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:

    The battle is over. Wokethink won. The right is now beating the left at its own game.

     

    In waging its war against the universities, the administration is using civil-rights law on behalf of Jewish students, arguing that chants can make Jewish students feel unsafe, and that pro-Palestinian op-eds about Gaza in campus newspapers do so much harm to American foreign policy that their authors must be deported. The American right protested at the woke left when it sought to censor ideas by equating words with violence and prescribed swift punishment for wrongthink. Now, not so much.

     

    https://www.economist.com/united-states/2025/06/10/does-america-now-have-a-woke-right

     

    We now get to worry about hurting the feelings of straight white males. 

     

    Even the right's favorite masseur-provacateur is having fun with the newest form of closed-mindedness:

     

    The most prominent accuser has been James Lindsay, an intellectual gadfly first of the left and lately of the right. He first came to prominence for the “grievance studies affair”, in which he and two co-authors submitted parody articles of leftist drivel, some of which successfully passed peer review. He recently conducted a similar prank by getting the thinly disguised introduction to Karl Marx’s “Communist Manifesto” published in a minor Christian publication (by substituting the words “Christian right” for “communism” and “liberalism” for “bourgeoisie”).

     

    Congratulations, Trumpies! You won the battle and lost the war.

    you picked a liberal to show how Conservatives are having an issue? Frankish this is very weak. Also to pretend the Columbia University situation was simply chanting is being disingenuous. People were prevented from going to class because of "takeovers" and Jews were told they should be killed. If you are openly threatening someones life that is not a peaceful protest anymore.

    • Agree 1
    • Thank you (+1) 2
  6. I want to give one example of how the kids are better behaved than their parents. At graduation we ask that all applause be held since we have 700+ kids to name individually, and we announce it in 3 languages. We only had  a few parents/families disobeying the rule and the kids whose families did act up all looked embarrassed by their family. every single student was great. 

    • Thank you (+1) 1
  7. 37 minutes ago, Roundybout said:


    ICE no longer respects the confines of the law and is, effectively, an unhinged Gestapo group. They need to be removed and prosecuted. 

    I agree if Californians want to allow people to burn cars, and loot stores that is their right, especially if those doing said burning and looting are here illegally. 

  8. 19 minutes ago, billsfan_34 said:

    Worked on Harriers, Avionics, and I was a legal officer. I have zero compassion for rioters and thugs, idiot. Now im an RN 3 classes shy from my masters. Saved lots of lives, served with all walks of life. I have loads of compassion, just not for pieces of morally corrupt twisted idealogues like you. What did you do for our country or community? Im waiting? No combat tours for you. Your thoughts would change when you are on the receiving end if death multiple times. You haven’t a clue. Just another armchair expert who knows jack *****. 

    I am going to defend him a little, he is older and lived through the 60s where the riots made more sense. He simply does not realize how much has changed and how these riots are 0% useful 

    • Like (+1) 1
    • Disagree 1
  9. 22 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

    never served.  so what's the line where it's no longer support.  shooting rubber bullets.  shooting live ammo?

     

    Fergy played while we had season tix.  he was no archie manning but he played for miserable teams too.  Several years he was one of their best players.

    https://today.yougov.com/topics/travel/survey-results/daily/2025/06/10/50147/3

     

    Do you approve or disapprove of deploying National Guard soldiers to the Los Angeles area to respond to protests over the federal government's immigration enforcement?

    All adults 

    Region

    Gender

    Politics

    Age

    Race

    Approve

    38%

    Disapprove

    45%

    Not sure

    17%

     

    Not sure how yougov does there polling but right now they have Newsome as more popular that Trump by a large margin and even CNN knows that is not true. 

  10. On 6/9/2025 at 11:49 AM, SectionC3 said:

    TDS.  Nice.   A usual fallback when you don’t know what you’re talking about.  What law, exactly, are you talking about here?  And aren’t those challenges (14A) typical conducted as equal protection exercises in the courts?  And, on top of that, you still have this little “powers not reserved problem” to get around. 

     

    Also, your spelling sucks.  It’s “raping.”  Not “rapeing.”  

     

    On 6/9/2025 at 11:49 AM, SectionC3 said:

     

     

    21 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

    Gaslighting, again.  What law is volatile of the 14A?  Just answer the question.  

     

    You already responded to me on this, did you forget? You said it should go before a court because the policies aren't laws. 

  11. 6 hours ago, SectionC3 said:

    Do you think history will show that the public was misled about DJT's current mental and physical condition?  

     

    Policy and law are two different things. 

     

    These are two of the dumbest posts I have ever seen from a liberal to cover up for their failures. DJT is out and about amongst the people almost every day and is very public. The hid Biden from view and kept telling you what to believe and you did. When they have to tell me something is a deepfake that is real your point will matter.

    As for policy vs law, to make this argument you are admitting the Dems policy is not enforcing the law. Your argument sounds similar to the old Dems of the 1920's, the law says everyone has equal rights it is just our policy does not apply that law across all races. 

  12. 1 hour ago, SectionC3 said:

    It’s shocking that you’re a teacher.  I ask again, what law has been created that so abridges the rights of the citizenry?  

    The policy of allowing people who destroy another's property to be free with no punishment or repayment. I actually had no idea that such a simple concept was beyond you and that you honestly did not know. 

    • Thank you (+1) 1
  13. 25 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

    Gaslighting.  I’m not defending anything other than common sense and law.  Powers not reserved delegates anything not enumerated  as a federal power to the states.  Like policing. Maybe when you pass that spelling class you can turn your lonely eyes to con law.  

    Thank you for repeating back to me what I wrote and then adding something that is not relevant. The state is denying people the privileges of being a US citizen, therefore the federal government is required to step in according to the 14th amendment.

  14. 40 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

    TDS.  Nice.   A usual fallback when you don’t know what you’re talking about.  What law, exactly, are you talking about here?  And aren’t those challenges (14A) typical conducted as equal protection exercises in the courts?  And, on top of that, you still have this little “powers not reserved problem” to get around. 

     

    Also, your spelling sucks.  It’s “raping.”  Not “rapeing.”  

    Powers not reserved means not spelled out. It is spelled out therefore the 10th is not applicable, I thought you were a lawyer? At this point we don't have time to go through a court, so I disagree. As for TDS, I want you to stop and think of why you are defending foreign nationals violently attacking American citizens? Or is setting fires not violence to you? 

  15. 15 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

    How’s Trump doing on the stairs?  Maybe he can land that new Qatari jet at the same airport George Washington used in the Revolutionary War.  Just because Biden is too old

    doesn’t mean that Trump can’t have scrambled eggs for brains.  Which he does.  

    10A.  Try reading it.  And, where is this responsibility of which you speak?  Let’s put our finger on it, shall we?  I didn’t realize you’re a tax and spend big government guy.   Because that’s what you now support. 
     

     

    The 14th amendment states "No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States". California is absolutely taking away the rights of its citizens. I find it amazing  the fact that you are literally defending the rights of gang bangers to continue rapeing and murdering people due to your TDS. 

    • Thank you (+1) 1
  16. 6 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

    They were stopping it.  I thought you were a states rights proponent.

    They were stopping it? So the police cars on fire was acceptable? Which state right are you advocating? The fact that you thought this response was clever makes you seem even dumber.

    • Agree 2
    • Thank you (+1) 1
  17. 49 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:

    I don't see the case here for federalizing the guard. Not yet at least. Other law enforcement (border patrol) have been deployed, and nearly all of the dangerous stuff was in that weird little municipality of Paramount, which I'd never even heard of before this.

    This should be considered an extreme step reserved for truly extreme situations.

    Do you believe the Border Patrol is appropriate to use in this situation? The Constitution was written with the assumption that people would want to defend their own, it was not written with the expectation a state and city could have molotov cocktails thrown and then state it was not a problem. 

    • Thank you (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...