Jump to content

Orlando Buffalo

Community Member
  • Posts

    8,783
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Orlando Buffalo

  1. 1 hour ago, Ed_Formerly_of_Roch said:

    I looking at getting tickets too.  Jax in early Nov can still be warm so unless you're a sun lover I'd try and get tickets on the west side lower down as that will be the first area in the shade.  It appears that's the side behind the Jax bench.

    I did forget about the shade issue. Even in November that much direct sunlight is bad for my Irish skin. That will have to be a consideration.

    • Haha (+1) 1
  2. I will be going to my first road game in 15 years in Jacksonville. I have honestly never bought themselves, always had my dad buy them because he always had people in Miami and Jacksonville then. Basically do you worry about section, and is there a "normal" place for visiting fans to sit? I know Bills fans will be 40% of fans at the game but curious on thoughts of those who go to road games often. 

  3. 10 hours ago, Niagara Bill said:

    Stop being a bigot.

    Trans people can be wonderful.

    Go Bills

    Are you really going to pretend that you thought that comment was anti anything except opening the border? If you did not realize it you truly have no sense of humor.

  4. 14 hours ago, B-Man said:

     

     

     

    Well they are following in the fine fine tradition of the Orlando Sentinel who called one of my teacher friends a white supremacist for a tweet that was anti Sharia law. She though is the direct descendant of slaves and the tweet was all about the rights women lose under Sharia. The Sentinel though called it a white supremacist tweet.

  5. 3 hours ago, The Frankish Reich said:

    They weren't dumb AT THE TIME. Remember, the accepted thinking in the early days of all of this (think February/March/April 2020) was that COVID was spread by droplets - something plexiglass shields would contain. Same thing with the 6-foot social distancing, which would at least in theory prevent most droplet transmission. And same too with the incessant wiping down of surfaces. Masks are not so good against aerosols (they're great against droplets), but they have some positive impact.

    The problem is we seem to have lost the ability adapt quickly. From Summer 2020 on, it became clear that the primary mode of transmission was through aerosols. And that the primary way to avoid this is to ensure high air turnover rates. So from that time on it became bad policy to focus on plexiglass when we should've been spending our money on ventilation. Same for schools - some schools have improved ventilation, others not at all.

    You and I agree completely that the biggest issue is that we are not adjusting quickly. When new information comes in the last ones to react are government forces and they usually are making things change based on old info. It is nice to know we can agree on something.

  6. What is odd to me that no one is discussing how much the passport will negatively effect minorities. Whites are vaccinated at a much higher rate than blacks and especially rich white people compared to poor blacks. The same people who complained how voter ID laws hurt 4% of blacks see no issue with slamming the door on 50% of blacks on a daily basis 

    • Like (+1) 1
  7. I think we are most likely 14-3.  losses vs the Titans, after laying KC that is a tough game. We lose to colts because Reich has the good luck this game. Finally we lose to Bucs because we are too hyped and play out of control. Thou looking at the schedule if this teams wins less than 11 I will shocked.

  8. 1 minute ago, ndirish1978 said:

     

    How do you reconcile this, 22 accusations for Watson, vs 2 accusations for AB? the NFL is hypocritical and doesn't want to lose money with ticket sales in Houston, period. AB was exempt-listed when he was a top 3 WR, but that's not the same as a Top 5 QB. Money is the only reason Watson isn't on the exempt list. 

    I am too lazy to look up AB but would Pitt have sat him? Houston is making it easy for NFL not to react. As for Watson the NFL can always impose the suspension once Texans take theirs off, and I think the NFL is trying to figure out how to ban him for life if he is found guilty of all these women.

  9. 21 minutes ago, EmotionallyUnstable said:


    They can do a number of things: 

     

    First, and foremost, is that they should place him on the commissioners exempt list. Essentially, this would remove him from the Texans 53 and make him ineligible to play (while still being paid). The NFL has an extensive history (Vick, Hardy, Hunt, etc) of using this process while legal proceedings are underway. It puts the onus on the league, instead of the team, to step in and handle the situation. 
     

    Second, they could suspend him temporarily or indefinitely. There does not need to be a civil/criminal charge or a conviction to do so. So to answer your question, it would remove him from the team facilities and dock his pay. 
     

    The NFL’s inaction while the legal proceeding play out, although the norm lately in many player situations, is a cop out. In my opinion, they are taking the easy road out, hiding behind due process instead of taking a stand against some obvious injustices. The league claims to champion social issues, promotes equality and wants to appear to be a progressive voice in our country, yet when faced with the chance to take a stand, does nothing. 

    I will disagree with you on taking any further action since accusations are not charges. Right now he has no charges, just an investigation. If the Texans were dumb enough to say they will let him play then an action would be needed. The main reason I say no further action until at least a formal indictment is right now he is not getting near the field, which is only real punishment from NFL and we don't want a precedent where we are suspending players because of just accusations. I hope the DA office handles this properly and he gets what is coming to him but the NFL can only keep him off field and stop paying him and we are not at the point we're they can stop pay.

    • Thank you (+1) 1
  10. 1 minute ago, BADOLBILZ said:

     

     

    The Bills oft-porous defense in the first half of the season forced the offense to keep the pedal down.

     

    1990 Bills had +165 point differential.......1991 "no-punt-game" Bills +140......2020 all-time scoring team Bills +126.

    I am sorry but I clearly remember us up by 28 all 16 games. I had forgotten how poor the defense played early.

  11. 1 hour ago, BUFFALOBART said:

    Truly religious people, let their actions, and deeds in life, speak for their faith.

    Tebow has to wear all of that sch!tt on his face, like a Billboard, when he is on the field.

    It's disingenuous, to say the least.

    I'm sure that his mama will console him, after being cut.

     

    Why do say he is disingenuous? He funds lots of charity events, and is a genuinely nice person from everyone I know who has ever met him. 

    • Like (+1) 3
  12. 2 hours ago, cgang said:

    Bills w/ lowest punt attempts per game last season:  https://www.teamrankings.com/nfl/stat/punt-attempts-per-game.

     

    Time for a repeat!

    I did not realize we were first but it is amazing that two points a game is the distance from top to almost last. I would have thought that we punted more than average teams in the fourth because we were winning by a couple scores so often.

  13. 4 minutes ago, DabillsDaBillsDaBills said:

    I don't think I've ever seen so many 2nd and 3rd hand "reports" of a player being arrogant, entitled, etc. 

     

    Seems that every other poster on here has a friend that went to college with Rosen that thought he was a jerk. 

     

    I still think he was given an awfully raw deal in both ARZ and MIA. I think the quality of the roster strongly contributed towards his terrible numbers - check out Bradford's and Fitz's stats for those seasons, respectively. 

     

    Given a stable situation and a team committed to him maybe he would've improved to being a good QB. Who can say? I will say his rookie season wasn't very much different from the right Josh's

    I only looked up Fitz's numbers in 2019 vs Wrong Josh. Fitz was 5-8, had a much higher completion %, a 20-13 TD/TO ratio vs Josh 1-5 ratio. Fitz was not great but only competent and much better.

    • Like (+1) 1
  14. 39 minutes ago, Sundancer said:

     

    Trump is a ***** leader but I don't think that even his crap leadership could have changed much in deaths and cases during Covid pre-vaccine. He could have been more honest, uniting and a million other things but people would have gotten Covid. 

     

    Now, post vaccine, he could have done a lot more. 

     

    Quote me the part of that story where it says, "in most cases the vaccine doesn't work after 6 months."

     

    You're the dumbest poster in this thread and that's saying something. 

    Yeah I got it, you think the vaccine lasts 8 months but you have to stick to the 6 months number because everything else you say you can't back up. I conceded the 8 months when the white house went with it because it is not a hill worth dying on. I would keep arguing with you but you literally don't answer questions and just keep linking to stuff that is not related to the 8 month time frame. 

  15. 2 hours ago, Sundancer said:

     

    You cannot read. I said the 18 months was a typo for 8. Of course no one has been vaccinated for 18 months. 

     

    You said "in most cases the vaccine doesn't work after 6 months" and in support posted a link that shows breakthrough cases to date have been 0.08% in all of those vaccinated. When I asked how many of that stellar high number are hospitalized and died vs. unvaccinated, you ran away, which is the smartest thing you've done here.

     

    https://www.yahoo.com/news/troubling-cdc-vaccine-data-convinced-132851003.html

     

    So your entire contention is that it is not 6 months but 8 months? 

  16. 3 hours ago, Sundancer said:

     

    Let's start with the hard question for you: How many states are there? 

     

    When you get that answer, you will start to answer your question if you look really closely at the first two letters of my post that you questioned.  

     

    Oh and since you're once again chicken little over-reacting with your link to OH MY GAWSH 125,000 CASES SINCE JULY, precisely what percentage breakthrough is 125,000 cases for 168,000,000 vaccinated people? 20% 10% 2%? 1% 0.5% Can't be lower than that can it? 

     

    You make this too easy, again helping me show how dumb your statement that "in most cases the vaccine doesn't work after 6 months" is perhaps the dumbest thing said in this thread, with a lot of dumb things. But at this point you've sextupled down on stupidity and keep linking stories that undermine your statement. Keep it up: Post another link. 

     you pick a date that is far less than 6 months out for most people since getting the vaccine and act like it is 6+ months, how many people were fully vaccinated on January 30th because that is the group we are discussing. More importantly you refuse to show your 18 month number when even the white house states it is 8 months.

  17. 1 hour ago, Sundancer said:

    VA data, again, in case @Buffalo Timmy didn't read it the other times I posted it. 

     

    image.thumb.png.85d48479fb68d5c1f4f2472a251db23c.png

     

    This clearly shows how vaccines don't work after 6 months for most people. Observe the spike in vaccinated individual cases and deaths at about mid August. 

     

    And let's not forget our brethren in England and their giant death spike. 

     

    image.thumb.png.153469c668a5c587f5488e4952415536.png

     

     

    I am curious where you got your table. NBC said there were 125k breakthrough cases on July 30th. Your table shows it never get close to 500 on any given week. One of these tables is incorrect. Even if each day was 500 breakthrough it would take 250 days to reach that total. 

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/ncna1275500

×
×
  • Create New...