BillsFanNC
-
Posts
23,581 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by BillsFanNC
-
-
-
Ignoring the evidence of your eyes and ears on Biden's dementia for four years is one thing, then there's saying.. yeah didn't everyone know that THE FRIGGIN POTUS was an empty vessel? So what? Just move on already.
EMBARRASSING.
Both are massive leftist copes and anyone occupying that ground as part of the current political "discussion" deserves no more than being ignored.
Everyone knows who Trump was, is and will be. If he shows signs of losing it such that he is obviously incapable of being POTUS I'll be the first to admit.
POTUS Vance is not something the left should want.
-
1
-
1
-
-
-
Quack often likes the appeal to authority, referencing science from elite institutions as supporting his science as being the only science that should be followed.
Funny that appeal didn't apply with the Quack cult when scientists from Stanford, Harvard and Oxford in OCTOBER OF 2020, released the Great Barrington Declaration and they were met with censorship on Twitter and elsewhere and had the Fauci and Collins working behind the scenes to undermine their message.
Signed by 940,000+ scientists worldwide to date.
The organizers of the Great Barrington Declaration were absolutely correct, and Jay Bhattacharya of Stanford is now NIH director.
They were right. Quack and his deranged ilk were wrong.
Suck it.
The Great Barrington Declaration – As infectious disease epidemiologists and public health scientists we have grave concerns about the damaging physical and mental health impacts of the prevailing COVID-19 policies, and recommend an approach we call Focused Protection.
Coming from both the left and right, and around the world, we have devoted our careers to protecting people. Current lockdown policies are producing devastating effects on short and long-term public health. The results (to name a few) include lower childhood vaccination rates, worsening cardiovascular disease outcomes, fewer cancer screenings and deteriorating mental health – leading to greater excess mortality in years to come, with the working class and younger members of society carrying the heaviest burden. Keeping students out of school is a grave injustice.
Keeping these measures in place until a vaccine is available will cause irreparable damage, with the underprivileged disproportionately harmed.
Fortunately, our understanding of the virus is growing. We know that vulnerability to death from COVID-19 is more than a thousand-fold higher in the old and infirm than the young. Indeed, for children, COVID-19 is less dangerous than many other harms, including influenza.
As immunity builds in the population, the risk of infection to all – including the vulnerable – falls. We know that all populations will eventually reach herd immunity – i.e. the point at which the rate of new infections is stable – and that this can be assisted by (but is not dependent upon) a vaccine. Our goal should therefore be to minimize mortality and social harm until we reach herd immunity.
The most compassionate approach that balances the risks and benefits of reaching herd immunity, is to allow those who are at minimal risk of death to live their lives normally to build up immunity to the virus through natural infection, while better protecting those who are at highest risk. We call this Focused Protection.
Adopting measures to protect the vulnerable should be the central aim of public health responses to COVID-19. By way of example, nursing homes should use staff with acquired immunity and perform frequent testing of other staff and all visitors. Staff rotation should be minimized. Retired people living at home should have groceries and other essentials delivered to their home. When possible, they should meet family members outside rather than inside. A comprehensive and detailed list of measures, including approaches to multi-generational households, can be implemented, and is well within the scope and capability of public health professionals.
Those who are not vulnerable should immediately be allowed to resume life as normal. Simple hygiene measures, such as hand washing and staying home when sick should be practiced by everyone to reduce the herd immunity threshold. Schools and universities should be open for in-person teaching. Extracurricular activities, such as sports, should be resumed. Young low-risk adults should work normally, rather than from home. Restaurants and other businesses should open. Arts, music, sport and other cultural activities should resume. People who are more at risk may participate if they wish, while society as a whole enjoys the protection conferred upon the vulnerable by those who have built up herd immunity.
On October 4, 2020, this declaration was authored and signed in Great Barrington, United States, by:
Dr. Martin Kulldorff, professor of medicine at Harvard University, a biostatistician, and epidemiologist with expertise in detecting and monitoring infectious disease outbreaks and vaccine safety evaluations.
Dr. Sunetra Gupta, professor at Oxford University, an epidemiologist with expertise in immunology, vaccine development, and mathematical modeling of infectious diseases.
Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, professor at Stanford University Medical School, a physician, epidemiologist, health economist, and public health policy expert focusing on infectious diseases and vulnerable populations.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Ridiculous takes that could only make Finding proud.
EMBARRASSING
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
38 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:
The Sargent at Arms reports into the Speaker. No board is present and convened at the Capitol to debate and vote on necessary immediate operational securiy measures.
The optics excuse is just that, an excuse because they were assembled about six blocks away. And the optics suddenly didn't matter when the call to deploy was finally made hours after the protest was over.
Why avoid the fact Nancy's office dropped the ball? And if it wasn't her then who on site made the call to not deploy? We still don't know as they refuse to say. While the original J6 committee avoided asking questions a new inquiry likely will not. Lies live in the darkness and the truth will once again see the light of day.
It ignores all the facts including the confirmed and undisputed fact that Trump authorized the call up of up to 10k national guard days before J6.
It also ignores the fact the Trump cannot unilaterally mobilize the NG. His pre approval required the Capitol Sargent at arms or DC mayor to enter a lawful request to make it happen. We also have documentary proof in writing that both the Sargent at arms and DC mayor Boweser declined to make the necessary request to satisfy the lawful mobilization of the NG.
This is the end of the story.
It's just yet another example of HomeBillsLand***** living under a green sky.
It's also another reason why everyone should ignore it.
-
22 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:
There’s the emotional side of an argument, and the legal side of an argument. Considered from the big picture perspective, the vast majority of people would tend to support due process and a fair and just legal process from start to finish. Of course, we know when humans and personalities get involved, fair and just are subjective terms. OJ Simpson comes to mind.
On the other hand, on a local level, when the system fails an individual or community, the lofty notion of due process becomes a bit more complicated. The takeover of the apartment complex in Colorado comes to mind. In that case, the system—the judicial system, law enforcement, ICE, etc, fails the tax paying citizen in spectacular fashion. Who could blame those people for being incredibly grateful for the removal and deportation of victimizers absent the long, laborious legal system that allowed the activity to flourish to begin with?
Put another way…show me the federal judge or defense attorney supporting crime and violence in his/her neighborhood and not using every tool or trick in the tool box to protect his/her family and I’ll show you an exceptionally rare person.
Which is why we should start housing all the misunderstood Maryland fathers awaiting due process in Chevy Chase, MD.
I'd wager most of the local due process screamers at the country club will demand those fathers wait out their due process machinations elsewhere.
-
1
-
-
Roundy, please stand up and take a bow...
-
1
-
UNIPARTY
in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Posted