Jump to content

BillsFanNC

Community Member
  • Posts

    20,364
  • Joined

Posts posted by BillsFanNC

  1. Remember that the trusted decade plus FBI informant:

     

    Was paid over six figures by the FBI.

     

    His identity was only known to the FBI.

     

    Was never known to, much less interviewed by Congress.

     

    Is now suddenly, with the walls closing in on Biden, some kind of Russian double agent.

     

    Given all of the above we are supposed to believe this says everything about Trump and the Biden impeachment inquiry being compromised, and not about the FBI paying and being duped by an agent of Russia for over a decade.

     

    Also,  whatever happened to Comey and Wray and their reticence to compromise sources and methods?

     

    They had no issue burning this CHS in a very public way.

     

    Seems like it might be difficult for the FBI to recruit CHS now...

     

    :lol:

     

    You need to be an incredibly stupid stooge to buy the narrative the IC and media are trying to sell you ......again. 

     

    Useful.

     

    Idiots.

  2. We can clear this up for you.

     

    1) We never knew the informant's name 

     

    2) We never talked to the informant

     

    3) The FBI never gave us his name and redacted the FD-1023 because they said he was so important to an ongoing investigation

     

    4) The FBI told the committee, including Democrats, the informant was highly credible

     

    No one is falling for this Russia Hoax 2.0 you're peddling.

     

     

  3. 1 hour ago, Tommy Callahan said:

     

     

    Remember they already did this in June 2020 via the "Transition integrity Project."

     

    Tell us useful idiots, how many many dems would go to jail under this scenario?

     

    Heck, by useful idiot standards, the people involved in even planning this type of scenario are insurrectionists.

     

    This is why people should be prepared now: They simply will not allow Trump to be POTUS again under any circumstances. 

     

    Seriously, compare this ridiculous dem scenario  to what Trump tried to do in reality. 

     

    And this wasn't a fringe group...Podesta, Brazille and other noteworthy dem names were involved.

     

    :lol:

     

     

    The final scenario was the only one that posited a clear Trump victory. Biden, like Hillary Clinton before him, won the popular vote (in this case, the margin was a decisive 52% to 47%). But Trump won the Electoral College victory with 286 electoral votes. In other words, Trump was the clear winner of the presidency. Biden conceded defeat on election night but then withdrew his concession as Democratic anger grew over another election in which the winner lost the popular vote but won the Electoral College. The Biden campaign pushed the Democratic governors of Michigan and Wisconsin to disregard Trump’s victory, overrule their state legislatures, and send Biden electors to Washington. House Democrats refused to recognize Trump’s Electoral College victory.

    The Biden campaign also came up with what appears to be a demand for concessions in exchange for recognition of Trump’s victory:

    Trump could take office if the Electoral College were eliminated, Washington, D.C., and Puerto Rico were given statehood, and California was divided into five states to create more Democratic senators. Otherwise, California, Oregon, and Washington state would secede from the union. In the end, the standoff “remained unresolved,” and Inauguration Day “arrived without a single president-elect.” The scenario ended with: “It was unclear what the military would do in this situation.”

     

    So those are the four scenarios. In only one did a candidate win a clear victory and the opposing candidate refuse to accept the result. And the loser who refused to accept the result was Biden — not Trump. That is precisely the opposite of the Trump-won’t-accept-results speculation that has dominated the media in recent weeks.

     

     

     

     

     

  4. 1 hour ago, Capco said:


    Who was still in control on January 6?

     

    Still in control of the Capitol and its police?

     

    Not Trump.

     

    Steven Sund was in charge that day. He would later that day have to wait 71 minutes to get help after the Capitol was breached. Despite begging for help from his superiors. Pelosi being one who could have authorized reinforcements.

     

    But that was later in the day and I'm speaking here of the rank and file officers who would have surely taken notice of an unauthorized structure on Capitol grounds between say 7 and 10 am.  Why wasn't it noticed and removed?

     

    In fact it remained there until 1 pm when the gallows dudes came back and finished their work.

     

    Why?

     

    Now after 1 pm the CHP surely had their hands full with other matters. 

     

    But by then it had been there for almost 6 hours undisturbed. 

     

    You don't find that strange?

     

     

     

×
×
  • Create New...