IDBillzFan

All you need is love. John Lennon. Smart man. Shot in the back. Very sad.

HEY! I don't think you caught the reality of that post. It was a "most liked" comment. MOST LIKED! Do you know how hard it is to have the 'most liked' comment on NYT? Do you? It's a freaking badge of awesomeness. That's what it is! And you dare disparage it? Clearly you're not a NYT reader. Because people who read the NYT are smarter than people who read, say, Marvel comics. Not MUCH smarter, mind you, but still...

Yes, well, some people are just incapable of being leaders and unifiers. Unfortunately we needed to elect Obama to find out what wasn't in him. If only rhetoric could lead.

That's because it was released in written form. They probably wrote it and thought "Y'know what...let's just release this on paper and not take any chances."

Generation Selfie turned me into the old man shouting for everyone to get off his lawn far, far sooner than I ever expected.

Of course she will. It's Huma's assistant to her assistant who will not get a job.

You're so busy trying to convince yourself you're winning an internet argument that you're now counting the times I tucked tail and stopped responding to you? Really? OOOOOkay. You win, sport. Get yourself another gold star. You really earned that one. Let me put in terms one last time so even you may be able to digest it: all the people grandstanding about the events unfolding in Baton Rouge are quiet when it's black on black murder. All the people grandstanding when a white person kills a black person are quiet when it's black on black murder. All the people having sit-ins in Congress for gun control when a gay muslim murders 50 people are quiet when it's black on black murder. It's just that simple. They're hypocrites. They only care to push an agenda to get the votes of the black community. And they certainly don't give a flying phucksnot about what your community is doing or they'd be in there doing with with you. I suspect this is where you start rambling nonsense, so as I walk away, feel free to tell all your online friends how a guy you've never met on a message board they'll never visit ran away from the crazy poster again. I'm certain you'll be the queen of the online ball this weekend.

Oh, gee. Another person who somehow thinks ripping someone to shreds on the political leg of an obscure message board dedicated to a crappy professional football team is...y'know...a thing to brag about. I'll bet you're all the rage on MySpace. It's as simple as this, Sparky: Everyone starts yelling when a white cop murders a black suspect, but none of you are yelling when it's a black-on-black murder. The president will call a news conference when a white cop murders a black suspect, but where was he on the 5th of July? In Chicago? Giving a speech about black-on-black murders and the need for us to find ways to get these senseless murders from happening every phucking weekend? No. He was golfing. That's how much he and all the similar posers care about blacks being murdered. It only matters when it fits an agenda.

Yeah, pretty much none of this has anything to do with what I wrote. But, y'know, thanks...I guess...for, y'know, whatever it is you're trying to say. It was a good effort.

This is a tweet just now from CNBC.

What happened the past two days is concerning, but if the police in this country were actively out to hunt down and murder blacks, don't you think it would be reported more often? Over the course of a year, you may have a few incidents like this, and yes, they are very bad and typically action is taken immediately to do everything possible to cut down on this. But while we sit here typing about something that happened over the past two days, 10 black people were murdered in Chicago last weekend and 55 more were shot. JUST LAST WEEKEND! Where is the concern? There is none. Why? Because the people who think white cops shooting black people is a problem don't care about the black people getting shot. They care about their political agenda. You see Obama making a speech today? Did he make one about his hometown after 10 blacks were murdered? No. It's a problem, but don't let the race-baiters get your dander up. If they really cared about black people being randomly murdered, they wouldn't wait for a white cop to do it before they start yelling.

If he makes Scott Walker his running mate and promises to quit after the election, I'm all in!

Also, I hear the President released a statement on these shootings. Kinda like he did with the murders of Kate Steinle when she was murdered by the illegal alien, and Hallel Ariel when she was murdered by a Palestinian terrorist. Oh. Wait. No. I'm wrong. He didn't so much as acknowledge those deaths. Hmmm. I wonder...what could possibly be different? Anyone have an idea? Bueller?

The upside for liberals is it looks like the Obama WH gets to take federal control of a couple of more police departments. How many is that now?

I recognize there are bad cops, but I really hate the way so many people are so quick to take a situation like this to raise hell. These people see a cop shoot a black guy, and yell that all cops are bad. They see a terrorists shoot a bunch of people in San Bernardino, and yell that all guns are bad everyone should give up their right to firearms. But let one Muslim murder 50 homosexuals after pleding his allegiance to a terrorist group, and these same people are yelling, "Hey, hey, hey...let's not jump to conclusions and bundle all Muslims into one group!" Something went wrong in Baton Rouge, but if the police talk to you, taze you and then STILL have to tackle you, I have to wonder what the conversation sounded like.

I wasn't playing it up to be something else. I understood what he was saying. What I'm arguing about is THE NEED TO BRING IT UP THE WAY HE DID. In what political world does it make sense to start a sentence with "But you know what Saddam Hussein did well?" Nothing. He didn't do anything well, you stupid phuck. Stop talking about what Saddam Hussein does well because...and here's the point as slowly as I can make it for you...NO ONE IN THE MEDIA IS LISTENING TO WHAT COMES NEXT. After seven years of making fun of Barack Obama for saying moronic crap off teleprompter, are we now going to try and defend Trump for the moronic crap he says off teleprompter? Are we going to defend his executive orders, as well? Laud him for having a pen and phone? This monkeyschitt is playing you all, and in November you're all going to be standing around with green slime like you just lost a Nickelodeon contest. Demand better. Stop compromising.

I understand that. What I'm arguing is that at least a person who was in it to win would be better at, pretty much, anything that Trump is or isn't doing. Romney gets his balls busted for a college prank or his wife owning a horse. Trump gets that PLUS he says stupid schitt all the time, so there never seems to a period where he is winning anything...not a week, not a day, not a news cycle (whatever that is). He loses every single time he opens his mouth, and there will come a time when people will want some substance, and Trump has absolutely no substance to anything he says or does. He's conning people because he neither has the desire to win nor cares about anything other than the Trump brand. His fans cheer him because they think it's a game show. And November will be an absolutely bloodbath for the GOP.

This has nothing to do with spin and everything to do with strategy. Think of the old adage "If you're explaining, you're losing." He's constantly having to explain stupid stuff. I don't care if the point he is trying to make is right or wrong...if it's presented in a way that is undisciplined and forces him to spend more time explaining his comment than explaining his point, he's losing. Throw in a media begging for any stupid thing, and you're screwed. They're unforced errors, against the weakest Dem candidate in years. And he's getting his ass handed to him because his brand is, intentionally, "Look at me while I say politically incorrect (i.e. stupid) stuff." That works for a TV show. It does not work for a presidential candidate, which is why he is getting his ass kicked in every poll in the free world.

It wasn't even articulated "kinda" smartly. It was stupid as schitt. Tell us how YOU, Mr. Trump, will deal with terrorists. Not Saddam. Then tell us what Hillary did while SoS, then explain how you'll be better and smarter and more professional than the woman who laundered foreign funds from terrorist nations through her non-profit foundation in exchange for uranium deals. Intead we get "Let me tell the good things Saddam Hussein did.

If you watched events unfold yesterday, particularly in the world of social media, two things were going on after the Comey press conference. The first was "Where is Trump?", who should have had his own presser immediately ready to go with canned responses for the two most possible outcomes from Comey. The second was "Trump's gonna screw this up by saying something stupid and change the narrative," which is precisely what happened. The final proof for me yesterday came last night, when I finally had a chance to surf the news channels. What does he do? A phone interview with Bill Freaking O'Reilly. No one else. Nowhere else. He's literally phoning it in. Why do you think this is?

It's not that he can't. It's that he doesn't want to. In all the presidential campaigns I have watched, never have I ever seen a candidate get taken down so publicly and with such undeniable proof of corruption as you watched Comey do to Hillary yesterday. A person who want to beat her...who genuinely wants to beat her...would have ridden that pony all day long. He would have pointed to her specific lies, over and over and over, and then sent his fanboys out to tell everyone else about each specific lie. He would have spent the entire day talking only about the FBI comments, and he'd have ads running for prime time last night. But he simply does not want to, and I can only assume this is for two reasons: (1) he never expected to win in the first place and is playing a TV role to promote his brand or (2) he knows he can hand the WH to Hillary, which whom he is close personal friends, and to whom he has donated millions. I guess there's a (3) he's just a dumbphuck moron. This is precisely what the right should be pointing out: limited government. Get the feds out of your life and leave key issues to the states. It's the easiest and best message, but you won't get it from Trump because he is a big government Democrat in word and deed.

Or they can... Leave it to the states Leave it to the states Leave it to the states Leave it to the states Over and over and over, repeat after me: "That's a states issue and I have no desire to make it a federal issue."

I know what he was trying to say. Unfortunately, he's a dumbphuck who is incapable of making a coherent point. He actually makes me miss John McCain as Dorf. You think just saying "Crooked Hillary" makes his point? How in the phuck do you run for President of the US and NOT know enough to avoid talking about the virtues of someone like Saddam Hussein in ANY capacity? How do you not just pound the Hillary corruption bit over and over, with your spokespersons discussing it over and over. But no. The moron does stupid stuff, like lift ad material from an anti-Semitic website, or praise Saddam Hussein. Yes, I know. It's ALL crap. But I would like, for just one week, for Trump to stop being the embarrassing dolt that makes Hillary Clinton look like a good choice. Unfortunately, he has no idea how to do it because his brand is being an embarrassing dolt. And please...give the whole religious right stuff a break. Christians are being murdered left and right in the world, and absolutely no one gives a schitt enough to speak up for them. Same with Jews. The people you see changing their positions are doing so out of fear. That you don't believe in God is not a reason to expect people of faith to compromise that faith. EDIT: Here's a good, brief article from Ben Shapiro that pretty much breaks down my attitude.

That's not what he's doing. He's being an idiot. On the one day he could have hit Hillary's corruption over and over and and over, he praises Hussein? Should he point out the good qualities of Hitler? "Sure he burned a bzillion Jews, but he did get guns off the street." Other candidates would have had an ad from Comey's presser out before Hillary left NC. But no. It's what most of us expected from a life-long Democrat posing as a conservative.