-
Posts
1,737 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by In-A-Gadda-Levitre
-
-
can't you backup 3/13-present and merge them after you restore the old content?
also, what will the data recovery service cost?
-
Where on earth did you get the idea that this is a good, deep WR draft class and it will be easier to come by one that way? Unfortunately for us, this is the weakest WR class in recent memory. There are NO WRs viewed worth the #11 pick in this draft. Sweed, Kelly, Thomas are all considered reaches at that point and there are no guarantees with them being as good as Roy or Anquan. In fact, odds are, they won't be as good.
I think you would hard pressed to find a single analyst, sports web page, coach, or even a knowledgeable fan that doesn't think this year's draft is incredibly deep in WR, one of the best in many years.
Are they worth a first round pick? Some likely are, but that's a subjective thing.
Will they be as good as Williams, Anquan or anyone else in the elite NFL receiver club? I doubt if anyone can really say they will or they won't.
-
This situationi is pretty easy to understand.
Johnson was a free agent.
John Guy is responsible for evaluating pro personnel, including free agents.
John Guy, perhaps, undersestimated the need for talent at the WR position (or he is just generally incompetent at pro personnel)
The result is the Bills do not add talent and force themselves into drafting a WR if they want to improve.
He wanted too much money (given his previous and expected performance), and later he wanted a 1 yr deal. I'm taking an educated guess here, but it sure seems the Bills FO collectively didn't want to do either of those.
Bryant Johnson simply wasn't the the right fit, and no other player of his caliber (seemingly) has wanted to try out.
Even though JG owns pro player development...position needs, valuation, and contract negotiation is a team effort.
-
nice job by Chris Brown on what went down between the Bills and Johnson
At that point the Johnson camp decided they wanted a one-year deal. Buffalo does not give one-year deals to 26-year old players. They are trying to build something over the long haul. A one-year deal doesn't help the team. If they signed Johnson to a one-year deal and he has a big year, then re-signing the player becomes difficult, he signs elsewhere for crazy money and the Bills would be in the same boat they're in now in terms of filling the #2 receiver role. -
I was amused that Marshall clueless Faulk was gushing over TE's quick thinking and getting the ball out of his hands, but almost all of the footage they showed was him holding the ball for many, many seconds. Not that TE doesn't make mostly good and quick decisions, but the highlights didn't match
-
Now THAT was bizarre. What complicated matters for me is, at the same time this place went down, buffalobills.com started getting redirected to a Network Solutions' page and/or an Adbaaz.com page. I have repeatedly checked my computer for any infection, and haven't found one...but, can't explain the redirect otherwise. Everything is now resolved.
Did anyone else had the problem with the Bills' site?
ya Dean, a lot of us did, it started a couple days ago. Totally unrelated to TBD meltdown. Some people were able to access buffalobills.com, others got the NS futbol page. Some wack DNS problem.
If the Tuna can't trade out or doesn't want to pay #1 pick
in The Stadium Wall Archives
Posted
it's interesting that someone suggested that scenario on FoxSports.com
not that Pete Schrager is worth listening to...