BillsFan130
-
Posts
9,560 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by BillsFan130
-
-
Just now, Starr Almighty said:
Can't argue with you there. We haven't had a decent linebacker since Spikes and Fletcher. Now that Kyle is old all we have is Hughes on the line. The way I see it is either try to sign Kirk Cousins and have a heavy defensive draft. Hope Peterman is the guy and draft defense. My final option which I think may be best is draft "the guy" at QB use the rest of your picks on Defense and build from there.
I agree with you on that. If the Bills miss the playoffs this year I hope they just lose out so they can get a high draft pick to get their guy. And then like you said, spend a lot of the remaining picks on that front 7
-
5 minutes ago, Starr Almighty said:
Why is signing FA's for the DL and drafting a QB not an option?
Always an option, but of course they are older and will cost more money which isn't necessarily ideal.
Generally you want to build in the draft and add 1 or 2 missing pieces in free agency. And the Bills have a lot of missing pieces in their front 7 which makes it very expensive to sign them
-
41 minutes ago, bigK14094 said:
Its pretty clear that not only did TT have trouble executing the Dennison Offense, the O line also has troubles. Putting Peterman in won't fix the fact that the line/Shady have not done well in Dennison's zone blocking scheme. My prediction...Peterman plays like the rookie he is..........gets two games, and then we have TT again.
I agree with most of what you said, except I think TT is done in Buffalo. I cant see them going back to him, unless Peterman gets injured
-
I hope this guy is gone. I cant stand his vanilla/predictable play calling.
I guess he has a chance to prove me wrong with a QB (Peterman) that fits his system better
Just now, section122 said:Imagine you had the #1 rushing offense 2 years running and now have the 17th. Imagine you had the #7 scoring offense last year and now have the 20th. All while having the same players. Dennison is trying to force players into his system. Much like Rex did. The players had to meet with the coaches during the bye to force them to go back to things that worked last year and the Bills had their 2 best offensive games. Dennison has done nothing in this league except play second fiddle. It should be obvious to all of us after the Rex debacle that coaching matters. Seeing a regression on 1 side of the ball when the players are the same points to the scheme or the coach. Both of those are on Dennison.
I hope Peterman comes in and kills it. I hope the Bills take a qb high and solve the qb position long term. I don't feel great about Dennison being the one to mold a young qb and develop him though. I hope his seat is very hot because he has mishandled this offense back to the offseason when he said he didn't care what they did last year.
Very well said and I agree 100 percent with everything
-
4 minutes ago, Maine-iac said:
Did you miss the part and I'll repeat it for you, where we were driving to go ahead right before that? If Manuel or McCoy could have made one yard we would have been driving for a go ahead score and that's half way through the 4th qtr.
Why does that matter?.... My point was, 7 points came from a defensive TD, and the other 7 came from a garbage time TD. That is inarguable
Like i said, 17 real points. And the game before that was what, 7?
-
2 minutes ago, Maine-iac said:
There was no "garbage time". It was 27 - 24 at the end of the 3rd and we were driving in the fourth but lost the ball on downs. Who threw those long TD's? How does that not count as offense? Is the point not to score points?
Thttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LS1MXPxMX28
Fast forward to about 2:52. You were saying there was no garbage time TD?
-
Just now, Maine-iac said:
Did that get us into the playoffs? Was it actually the defense that needed help? Actually the Bills scored 31 points in the game they fired Roman after. It was horsecrap and everyone knew it.
31 points- 7 from a defensive TD, 7 in garbage time. So basically 17 real points. Anyone who watched that game knew their offence was terrible. They scored 2 long tds on, one busted coverage by the Jets, and one a 85 yard play from Goodwin. (That was a nice play I will give them that)
And no it didn't get them in the playoffs but that doesn't mean there wasn't an offensive improvement.
Not getting in the playoffs mayyyyy had something to do with losing to the Dolphins twice and giving up 450 yards combined to Ajayi....
-
36 minutes ago, Maine-iac said:
Defense isn't getting it done. Make a change on offense. Did the same thing last year. I'm not anti Peterman but I bet it will have as much chance of fixing things as swiching to Lynn did last year.
I would say the switch to Lynn worked out last year. Do you remember how bad their offence was the first 2 games of last year?
-
3 hours ago, Billzgobowlin said:
I am talking about the Bills defense
Ok then ignore my first paragraph lol
-
No one really knows. I guess we will find out soon enough
-
58 minutes ago, CuddyDark said:
Wrong. Teams will Blitz Peterman because he's a rookie. If he defeats that, then they have 2 weeks.
Sounds about right
50 minutes ago, matter2003 said:I doubt that is going to work
He struggled against the blitz in pre season and he's a rookie so you can bet D coordinators will be throwing some blitzes his way.
Whether it works or not, that remains to be seen
-
13 minutes ago, jmc12290 said:
So Beane and McD did nothing in Carolina. Opinion noted. Lol
In terms of drafting, McD did nothing.
Beane I'm sure contributed to drafting, but I believe Ron Rivera and Gettleman had a much higher say.
Wellit's pretty much a fact Gettleman had a higher say because he's the general manager.
And just because I said he's an assistant, it doesn't mean he did nothing. Im saying the difference between being the assistant and "the guy" is a huge
-
1 minute ago, jmc12290 said:
The defensive coordinator certainly has input. He also coaches.
Also, where did Brandon Beane work?
How do you know they have any input? A defensive coordinator is way down on the totem pole when it comes to drafting, why would they get input/the final say on who to draft? I would go out on a limb and say they have 0 input. At the scouting combines, who represents their teams? The head coach, scouts, and GM. Sure as hell not a coordinator
Beane was an assistant G/M. Assistant being the key word. This is his first time being the actual general manager. 100 percent different
-
Just now, jmc12290 said:
Who scouted, drafted/signed and coached those All-Pros? You're making my argument for me.
2015 was actually 2 years ago.
Ron Rivera/Their scouts/ Gettleman... lol.
What defensive coordinator scouts and drafts players?....
-
2 minutes ago, jmc12290 said:
#6 defense, 15-1, NFC Champs.
Not a lot of maybes surrounding that.
Not disputing the 2015 stats. 2015 is a long time ago.
How many all pros on the defensive side that year though? 3?
-
12 minutes ago, jmc12290 said:
Superbowl hangover. It was great in 2015.
Maybe, maybe not. Gruden said on Monday night that they are blitzing a lot more this year and it has been extremely effective
-
23 minutes ago, joesixpack said:
I'm sorry, but I'm calling bull **** on this. NO ONE saw this coming. Not you, not any analyst, no one.
Who knows If the Bills would have traded Sammy in return for a late 2nd round pick. They probably thought it would be between 35-40
-
Dennison wasn't really utilizing TT's legs during the run game anyway. He should have, but rarely did
-
Just now, MAJBobby said:
The Run Pass Option is modern Offense.
What is being talked about here as double passes etc etc is a gimmick.
Wont work anyway becUse play the run with Taylor he wont throw the contested pass.
Maybe i can get on board with coming in the readzone and running some read option but that is about it
Ok fair enough, I thought you were more referring to the read options/run pass options
-
19 minutes ago, MAJBobby said:
No no no just run a Modern NFL Offense.
Taylor was benched not going back onto the field unless Peterman gets hurt
How did Carolina's offence look Monday night? Some of those plays sure as hell weren't "modern"
-
5 minutes ago, Commonsense said:
They are 5-4 and the rookie got nearly 3 months more time in the playbook and on the practice field. Why wouldn't they give Taylor a shot to conform into their system? They came in and did their own evaluations. Would you rather they have trusted what they saw from players under Rex's watch?
What was wrong with their offence last year? What were they, 13th or 14th or something? Last year the defence was the main problem.
If you plug last years offence into a descent defence, (like we had at the beginning of the year).you easily have a playoff team
Just look at the offensive numbers from last years to this years. I really don't know what else to say
-
Just now, Commonsense said:
What if they were looking beyond 17' and didn't want to cater to any players for short term gains in exchange for long term evaluations?
From the roster shuffle and the way the season has played out I believe this very much too be the case.
If they were looking beyond 17', they should have never started Tyrod in the first place. Should have went with the rookie QB who fits the offence better if that's the case
-
1 minute ago, Kirby Jackson said:
I don’t disagree but that just further illustrates my point. That’s coaching. You undid a bunch of things that worked and replaced them with your way of doing things. That’s not smart.
That's exactly it.
Here is an example. For my profession, I am a fitness professional who helps people with fat loss.
Every single one of my clients is different, and if I did the same thing for one client as I did the other, it simply would not work.
I have to have a different approach with every single person to get them towards their fat loss goals.
In this example? Dennison refused to do what worked best for Tyrod, and he is just sticking with a "One size fits all" type of deal. That is terrible coaching.
Maybe his offence works with a prototypical pocket passer, but that's not who Tyrod is. So until we find that person, he should have altered his stubborn approach
-
Just now, BobChalmers said:
Well for his sake let's hope he doesn't turn his benching into something racial - as he was recently with his critics.
He brought up the race card? I never heard about that
ESPN Claims Taylor claiming racial motivation for benching?
in The Stadium Wall Archives
Posted
ESPN is such a joke