hammet89

So your saying out of the three. Mckelvin makes it over rogers and Brooks? Granted Brooks is unproven but with Rogers return ability I highly doubt they cut him, and IMO mckelvin vs Brooks is the real battle... I just don't think mckelvin stays over the other two unless they move Brooks to the ps. Itd make more sense to cut batten to keep the extra corner, after this year they are going to need the ones they just drafted anyways

Not for a first... They'd have to throw something in to sweeten the deal but a second and fourth or something like that I'd do it in a heartbeat,

Probably have to go to three to get either of them... With the help the jags need I don't see them giving up that pick unless we offer them some kinda of unrefusable deal

The shock: spiller moves to wide receiver, buffalo drafts Richardson at 10... Won't happen but semi makes sense since he will be a player that may not be there at 10 as described in the right up

He just doesn't want to play steve Johnson twice this year that's all

I wouldn't include my second or third round pick... Too many good players of need there to give that up... I realize Fitzpatrick is no Aaron Rodgers talent wise... But both are equally as mobile... And Rodgers was able to perform with a much worse line then we have now... Yes he had better receivers... But I'm strictly speaking about qb evasiveness and mobility... I like kalil, but even if he's there at 10 I may not pull the trigger because someone good at that position will fall I'm thinking... We could snag whoever that is in the second round... Cleveland has a pretty solid left tackle, but ask colt McCoy how the rest of his line is doing... Kalil is no Thomas, and not even Thomas can help that much in Cleveland despite being a stud

Hairstons the starter we should go with... Unless kalil is on the board at 10 still

For some reason the bills always lose key players to injury early on... I believe the one year we lost mckelvin early... Although he isn't that good, that may have played a decent role in his lack of positive growth at the cb position

There wouldn't be a lot of reason to keep a rookie injured\ sick for his first two years before he stepped on the field... If he pans out then we have our speed receiver... I remember him being pretty fast In college

I may be new here... And you have a lot of good points... At this point though the need for tight end on this team is not a priority... If they felt it was I feel they would have made a move for One in free agency... On the topic of slot Wr... I have to really disagree with that... We do need a number two reciever that's for sure... But we have a slot receiver much better then Parrish... That's David Nelson... He may be the best receiver on the team when it comes to third down and long