Jump to content

Mickey

Community Member
  • Posts

    6,213
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Mickey

  1. Thanks for the well wishes, I feel much better after reading them. 

     

    Mazie is not getting worse but only maybe a tiny little bit better. They started her on high flow oxygen treatment which requires mild sedation. We won't know if it is helping until tomorrow morning. Lungs are slightly improved but still severely effected, even after 5 days of antibiotics. Aspiration pneumonia is very, very tough to beat.

  2. I have a 6 year old Bernese Mountain Dog named Mazie that is in the hospital struggling with aspirational pneumonia.  It has been almost 5 days now and though she isn't improving, she is not getting worse. Please send whatever good thoughts and energy you can her way.

     

    This dog saved our lives, twice. Once when 2-3 people broke into our house at 3:00 AM, while we were in the house. Mazie charged down the stairs and made them instantly regret their career choices as they dropped everything and went running down the street. The robbery was orchestrated by a gang whose MO was to hire kids under 18 to break in and then hand goods (car keys especially) to the gang members outside. Several were arrested and all stolen goods recovered. The second time was when Mazie's Mom was walking Mazie in a local park which, unknown to us, had been the scene of several bloody attacks  by two stray pit bulls. My spouse was confronted by two snarling pit bulls, the same ones that had been terrorizing the park and recently sent a cyclist to the hospital.  They went after her, she dropped the leash and ran, falling over a low retaining wall trying to get away and was bleeding from both knees.  The pit bulls jumped the low wall and were about to attack when Mazie jumped between her and the pit bulls and basically turned into Kujo. The pit bulls both turned and ran. 

     

    Thanks for listening.

     

     

    • Like (+1) 7
    • Sad 2
    • Shocked 1
  3. 18 minutes ago, Kornfed said:

    And I used to think that this was the most inclusive society in the history of mankind .... oh wait a minute. It is. ..... 

    Not even close. There are many far more inclusive societies and quite a number of them didn't have to endure a bloody civil war that took the lives of thousands upon thousands just to get rid of slavery.  On the Liberty Index, the US currently ranks 26th in the world behind Japan and just ahead of Uruguay.  

    • Like (+1) 1
    • Haha (+1) 2
    • Thank you (+1) 5
  4. 5 hours ago, Doc Brown said:

    "Been invited" and they'll pry be subpoenad if they don't oblige.

     

    They do that so the witness can say that they are "testifying voluntarily" which, back in the day, actually meant something. Now it is just another opportunity for reluctant witnesses to delay, delay, delay. Old lawyer saying: if you can't win the fight, delay the fight.  The erosion of the efficacy of the subpoena power has significantly weakened the foundations of democracy.  Public reprobation against those who would evade testifying is unfortunately no longer a thing.

    • Like (+1) 2
    • Agree 2
    • Thank you (+1) 4
  5. 10 hours ago, CA OC Bills Fan said:

    I was thinking similarly to Mickey regarding the 1 yard rule. Do you really think that at the end of the game the rules should change just to let the team that couldn't win otherwise have a better chance to come back at the end? Or, if that's the rule for the entire game, what does that do to the length of the game? The NFL over time has made efforts to keeping the game moving, not make it longer. One rule they changed several years back (which is different at the end of each half by the way) is that they used to stop the clock whenever the ball carrier went out of bounds. They changed it to stopping the last 2 minutes of the 1st half and last 5 of the 2nd half, the rest of the game they stop it just until the ball is spotted (usually takes 5 seconds or less).

    It is even worse when you play it out down by down. 

     

    First Down: Winning team dives into the line ending in a huge pile of very large bodies. The refs stop the clock to pull the mosh pit apart, one by one.  Unable to see much of anything, the refs do their best to spot the ball. It is too close to call so they bring out the 1 yard chain and measure. They are short of a yard by a fly speck or two so the clock stops. But wait, the winning team challenges the spot, off we go to replay review land. Replay is useless, no good angles, the call stands and fans will  be blasting hate against the NFL, the refs and the vagaries of fate for years to come over the clearly erroneous spot.  Commercials consumed: 18

     

    Second Down:  Rinse, lather, repeat only this time the winning team gets the bogus spot in its favor. After all the measuring and reviewing and choking to death on the piles and piles of commercials, we move to third down.  Commercials consumed: 21

     

    Third Down:  Same as First Down only 30 minutes later.  Total commercials consumed: 47

     

    Thank goodness we thought of a way not to waste that last 27 seconds.

    • Agree 1
    • Awesome! (+1) 1
  6. 1 hour ago, Beast said:

    I like that gaining a yard rule.

     

    Me too, think of all the fun we will have watching measurements after each of the first three downs and replay reviews of the spot. What used to take a minute or two to accomplish could take 20 minutes or more. 

     

    Seriously, I see no reason to suspend the normal rules used for the whole game in favor of some half-baked, unlimited time out scheme  just to turn a game that is over into a game that is never over. 

    • Disagree 2
    • Awesome! (+1) 1
    • Thank you (+1) 2
    • Dislike 1
  7. 9 hours ago, Long Suffering Fan said:

     

    What are you guys all married to lawyers?  People who defend lawyers tend to have very limited experience with bad ones.  Without going into details, I or (mostly) my friends have had bad encounters with them in civil, criminal, custody, and divorce cases.  They love to extend because they make more money.  In some cases it is also beneficial to their client, but the motivation is always there.  

     

    Oh, the billable hour argument...yes, they spend that time...well, maybe.  They say they spent that amount of time, but you have no way to prove they did or didn't.  I know of one case where someone I knew was being just ripped off.  When he asked for a list of billable hours to prove, they sent back a list that included ridiculous things.  There is no way to prove that they didn't work that time on your case...or someone else's.  Well, they should just get another lawyer - yeah, you are 25 grand into a lawyer that wants 5K more to finish your case and if you move now, you have to start over.  I have had lawyers tell me even worse stories.  I have had lawyers tell me to avoid certain other lawyers because they will milk you for all your worth.

     

    Oh, and the people pay for that work because they are worth it line....ugh.  It would be more accurate to say that they pay for that work because they have no freaking choice.  Someone facing a problem that needs a lawyer - their life, or their kids, or their bank account is on the line.

     

    Listen, I know that there are good lawyers.  I just hope that you don't find out the hard way that there are bad ones.

     

     

    This.  Our legal system is messed up on many levels and having speedy trials would solve at least some of the problems.

     

    I'm sure your, ummm friends, who seem to have a lot of experience needing lawyers, have told you both sides of the story. I am sure the lawyers badmouthing other lawyers are not at all self interested.   And it totally makes sense that with your life on the line you would have no choice but to hire a bad lawyer.   We can have all the speedy trials you want, just invest more tax dollars in the legal system. More courts, more judges, more clerks and more lawyers.  Judging a delay as either justifiable under the circumstances or a two-bit tactic is in the eyes of the beholder.   Fortunately we have these impartial legal experts, we call them judges, who can decide to grant or deny a request for an adjournment.  Sure, our view from reading headlines, ignorant of the details, makes us far better judges of these matters than the actual, real live judges.  Plus, it helps to fire up our rant machines and that is always so much fun. 

    • Agree 1
    • Thank you (+1) 1
  8. 5 hours ago, maddenboy said:

    we dont have civil discovery in criminal cases.

     

    there's no depositions and very little discovery.  Of course a higher priced lawyer will engage in endless motion play, seeking all kinds of ridiculous or reasonable things that the average public defender doesnt have time for.  (like, in this case, a speed survey, accident history kept by the government for that location, vehicle repair info, video from the chiefs' building, and motions to exclude all sorts of things, a motion for site view [packing all the jurors into a bus to go visit the site because its important for some reason or another])

     

    And in crim, we dont worry about witness schedules much.  Here is your subpoena.  see you in court.

     

    Otherwise, yes.  Court cases just take time.  even the routine ones.

     

    Every victim in every case, i imagine, is irritated that the defendant's trial is not tomorrow morning.  But every case cant be tomorrow morning.

     

    Missouri is one of a handful of states that allows unlimited depositions in criminal cases. There is plenty of discovery going on, especially where expert witnesses are concerned and in a case like this, there are always experts. Courts routinely change schedules for experts which is why so many are videotaped which takes forever to complete.  Caseloads backed up during covid related closures have to be a nightmare. It's a shame that it takes so long but I haven't heard any brilliant solutions.

    • Thank you (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...