unbillievable
-
Posts
4,337 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by unbillievable
-
-
If the goal is to destroy the American system in order to re-build it anew: The People's republic of America!
-
This thread has turned into a battle between people who have kept up with all the facts of the case vs those who stopped paying attention during last year's media blitz.
-
I don't think that was admitted as evidence in court.
I have doubts that the jury will keep their discussions only to evidence that they saw in court.
-
This is why he will...
-
Is there any proof that it was Zimmerman's gun?
I know George said it was his but, he's a proven liar, so we can't trust what he says...
-
conversation with dispatch and colaboration from Travons friend proves Zimmerman continued to be the aggressor chasing a man who had commited no crime.
which is why Zimmerman will be convicted of manslaughter in my opinion.
Do you think that Trayvon was equally negligent for ignoring Jeantel's order for him to run to the house rather than confront Zimmerman?
-
I gave my opinion and thats what we do here right? Opinions are like A holes, everybody has one,
Zimmerman will be convicted of manslaughter in my opinion...
Everyone is calling you an "idiot" because you're basing your bad opinion on falsehoods instead of facts.
ie:
Everyone knows the moon is made of cheese. I believe the moon landings were faked. They didn't bring back any cheese. just rocks.
-
At this point, I think the prosecutors are tanking the case on purpose.
Is it possible that the obviously anti-Zimmerman judge will see that the prosecution isn't trying and toss them (and the trial) out so the state can redo it all again?
-
So, is god fat? He did make us in his likeness.
Actually, it would make him a skinny Asian.
-
an experiment that's never been tried. but i suspect global wealth would decrease, mostly due to a large loss of wealth at the top and then in reinvestment. the absolute wealth shared between the 99% would likely increase substantially. meaning .75 of x would be greater than .4 of y. x may well be less than y but not by an amount proportional to the change in distribution. this is all pure conjecture. you don't know and i don't know.
Ever heard of Communism?
-
The kids were high on Skittles.
-
How to understanding Birdog's logic:
-ie: Four people who work the same job and are paid the same wages.
week 1
Person 1 invests $100 in stock and it's now worth $200
Person 2 buys a new phone for $100
Person 3 throws a party and buys a keg of beer for $100
Person 4 invests $100 in stock and loses it all
week 2
Person 1 buys himself a phone and a keg for $200
Person 2 wants to buy a keg but there are none left this week
Person 3 wants to buy a phone but there are none left this week
Person 4 blames person 1 , then decides to occupy his lawn.
Now extend this model over several generations. Despite having the same job and getting paid the same salary, person 1 will eventually dwarf the wealth of person 2,3 & 4 to the point where he will be able to deny them access to any and all resources if he so chooses.
So even if they started out the same, at the end, person 1 can offer to pay $101 for the phone and keg thus pushing the same product out of reach of person 2,3 & 4; theoretically making them poorer since their salary will no longer be able to buy the same products as before.
The eventual goal of Birddog is to take Person 1's invested $100 profit and give it person 4, then take person 2's phone and give everyone access to it; thus restoring the balance of wealth. (or simply prohibit the acquisition of wealth like in Star Trek)
-
While I applaud the kid's convictions to his beliefs, this is the kind of person you don't want to entrust with military secrets.
-
I have no problem giving these guys luxury vacations on tax payer money. They work hard doing a job that everyone hates them for.
(If you're reading this IRS, i fully support anything and everything you feel you must do. All hail the republic!)
-
Well, that's never been my experience, so I'm calling you out on this one. I've been involved with furthering the careers of many females and they moved up because they deserved it. Your remarks are petty but mostly ignorant.
Answer this question:
Do you think that women are allowed more excuses to leave work then men? Children having problems? Personal Issues? Maternity leave? Weddings, Funerals, Birthdays? Girlfriends, In-laws, grand-children in town? Doctor's appointments for kids and husband? Mother's day?
I would say men are allowed 1 excuse: That they're hung over because of the game last night. Every other instance they're told to "man up" and take it; Go to work and support your family.
And if we are going by anecdote, men eff about a lot more than women. In my office, the women are mostly busting their butt all day and the men are goofing around more. Women in my office tend to be way more diligent than their male counterparts.
I've worked in office settings, and restaurants (where women out-number the men) and also in construction and manufacturing (where men outnumber the women) and I have to say that the anecdote of which gender works more diligently is actually more a reflection of the company and environment. There really isn't much difference there. Sometimes it's the guys that are goof-offs and sometimes it's the girls.
But I think, in this culture, we tend to be harsher on the guys to provide for their family by staying at work, while allowing the women to do same by letting them leave.
-
Is it bizarre to think that the case has so completely turned around that it's now racist to believe that the man is guilty...
...when the opposite was true at the beginning?
-
Anyone who's ever worked with a woman knows exactly why they get paid less... because they don't work as much.
-
Where are all these hungry people anyway?
In every right wing dominated country of the world
---(cause the left wing dominated ones aren't allowed to complain)
-
Hypothetical:
Imagine a world where the wealth was perfectly distributed. Everyone had the exact same everything. How would it look? How do you make it work?
-
!@#$ Will Smith and Morgan Freeman. We need Bruce Willis, Ben Affleck, Billy Bob Thornton and Steve Buscemi!
Did anyone notice that Denver seems to be the safest place to go in disaster movies?
-
If the Republican sequester hadn't forced Obama to cut Nasa's funding a few years ago, this asteriod would never have been allowed to get this close.
-
How would reducing the amount of rich people help the people who are starving?
-
So it all comes back to character assassination and a general propensity argument. The wounds are evidence of a struggle....but not the important parts of GZ's story. The location of the struggle is perhaps the only actual evidence that supports anything GZ claims...and even that can be argued either way given the holes in what happened.
Which would mean that George should walk and that this should never have gone to trial for Murder 2.
You can't send a person to jail for murder if all the prosecution can argue is that "maybe he's lying" and that "it could have happened this other way too," just because a guy has a sketchy past. Only the Defense can play the "Maybe This or that happened" game. Unless the state can produce a witness willing to testify that he saw everything, then we're just wasting tax payer money in a futile attempt to appease the public and media.
-
it is confusing the issue to point out that George described Trayvin running away on the phone as it happened?
Which begs the question how the altercation could have occured that close to the car if Trayvon had continued to run away?
The 911 call transcript shows that George had lost sight of Trayvon, then headed back to his car. For the location of the altercation to make sense, it would mean that either Trayvon hid somewhere when George passed him then was found when Zimmerman walked back to his car, or Trayvon CAME BACK towards George to confront him.
Trayvon Martin Case
in The Stadium Wall Archives
Posted · Edited by unbillievable
Clearly, people who are getting assaulted must take their beating graciously, because they initiated it by getting out of their car.