Kemp

I notice you ignored the chart I posted that directly addresses the title of this thread. It's not surprising.

Hey. You still can't answer who in the media has integrity. https://twitter.com/krassenstein/status/1735668707794321587?t=O8VgvM2D3MdLgybaMYpIeA&s=19

The brave Tommy is still hiding in another thread. Tommy claims he wants stats. After I give them to him, he'll change his tactics again.

https://www.eia.gov/petroleum/gasdiesel/ https://www.forbes.com/sites/rogervaldez/2023/08/02/counterpoint-wall-street-ownership-is-why-housing-is-out-of-reach/ A little dose of realty for pinhead Trumpers.

Who in the media has integrity? Which media outlet has integrity? Why can't you answer?

That's great about the farmer. Still waiting. Who in the media has integrity? Which media outlet has integrity? Why can't you answer?

Still waiting. Who in the media has integrity? Which media outlet has integrity? Why can't you answer?

He can't stop. He is in a cult.

It's not lost on me or anyone else that every time you're asked a simple question you avoid answering it. Let's try again on at least one question. Who in the media do you believe has integrity? There has to be someone or something because by the time information gets to anyone it is at least somewhat filtered by someone in media or a media entity.

Supporting Trump while speaking indignantly about integririty is an interesting view. We know you hate the "media". Do you believe Trump is a man of integrity? Is there a single media company or person in the media that you believe has integrity?

Edit: I forgot to mention that some Trump supporters are just fine with having a dictator. Just like folks in Hungary and Argentina. Your first sentence is accurate. What's your opinion on that topic? Should a President be immune from being charged with a crime while President? You believe the crux of Smith's case is whether Trump wanted to attend the insurrection?

You think Mrs. Hutchinson's testimony is what the case is about?

It's apparent you have not a clue what hearsay means.

Do Trump supporters here think they know Trump better than those that worked for him? Why do you suppose those that worked for him are warning America not to vote for him? Are they now deep-state? Were they always deep-state? Is it all a nefarious plot that can be explained by Hunter's laptop? To help some of the slower Trump supporters, calling Christie fat while backing the other fat guy is an embarrassing take. Then again, aren't all Trump supporters slow? Nah. Some of them truly believe that Trump II won't be a dictator. Oh, right, that makes them slow.

It's not about hope. He will do it. It will end up at the Supreme Court. No idea how that will turn out, but if they rule against him, he will ignore the decision. Then, there's no telling what happens next.

Quoting Loomer means you're as stupid as she is. Loomer has posted various conspiracy theories, mostly related to mass shootings. She has falsely claimed that school shootings in February 2018 in Parkland, Florida, and in May 2018 in Santa Fe, Texas, were staged, and that the perpetrator of the 2017 Las Vegas shootings was affiliated with ISIS. Loomer claimed on Twitter that crisis actors were used for the Santa Fe school shooting, prompting concerns about the amplification of misleading information and conspiracy theories by troll farms and social bots. There are many other examples of Loomer's Lunacy.

This didn't age well.

At least Aristocrat tries, Tommy.

I know I'm shocked he chickened out. I'm equally shocked that his lawyer lied about him testifying. He already lost the case he continues to rail about in front of cameras. It's all about the damages now. His only hope now is that he becomes President in '24 so he can jail the AG and the judge and everyone else that has ever annoyed him. Won't that be fun times in America.

Yeah, that's what you meant by your original statement. Your 5 out of 6 statement is STILL wrong, even under your new illogic. That might be the funniest and saddest part of everything you've alleged on this topic.

This was whether or not these people are all capitalizing on their time with Trump, as you alleged. I detailed it all. If one of them ever writes a cookbook, it is not evidence of your assertion. Since you can't be this stupid, you land squarely in the other column.

5 out of the first 6, eh? Priebus doesn't. McMaster wrote a book, but it's NOT about Trump. Mnuchin doesn't. Cohn doesn't. Kelly doesn't. Mattis wrote a book, but it's NOT about Trump. Barr wrote a book that's partially about Trump. Stone has a book PRAISING Trump. Bannon doesn't. Tillerson doesn't. So, are you lying or inept? You've taken the lead as the biggest liar/idiot on this board.

You just make up stuff. Kind of like the orange guy. How many of the folks on that list wrote books ripping Trump? If you're going to just lie, at least make it difficult to prove you so wrong. Sounds awfully familiar.