Jump to content

MarlinTheMagician

Community Member
  • Posts

    1,427
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by MarlinTheMagician

  1. 5 minutes ago, Process said:

    Is he willing to sign for less than Ian Thomas? If so sure. If not than just draft a guy in the 4th round.

    What did Thomas sign for?  Not sure you can compare them.  Thomas has caught 90 balls in 4 years.  Hooper caught 71 in a single season.  Knox, who is my one of my faves and my #1, only caught like 48 or 49 in his best year.  They are all about the same age (Thomas 26, Hooper 27 and Knox 25).

  2. We have a hole at 2nd tight end.  Bean seems to like these cut players to fill holes.  Would not count against a comp pick right?  And only 27 years old.

     

    Wizard Beane is methodically filling holes.  So far addressed guard, two run stuffing DTs and a back that will help in passing game.

     

    TE, along with Corner, WR and Edge are my remaining hopes for FA and draft.  Hooper would fill one!

  3. Traded down:

     

    37. Trent McDuffie

    CB Washington

     

    57. Travis Jones

    DT Connecticut

     

    65.Lecitus Smith

    OG Virginia Tech

     

    80. George Pickens

    WR Georgia

     

    89. Skyy Moore

    WR Western Michigan

     

    168. Hassan Haskins

    RB Michigan

     

    202. Josh Paschal

    EDGE Kentucky

     

    229. Zach Tom

    OT Wake Forest

     

    244. Matt Araiza

    P San Diego State

    • Like (+1) 6
    • Awesome! (+1) 1
  4. Love Knox and want us to sign him.  This is the year to draft a good tight end by rounds 3-4 so (i) can create mismatches with Knox on the field, (ii) give us a tiny bit of leverage in the Knox negotiations, and (iii) provide us some insurance in case Knox is showered with cash by a team that overpays and that Beane won't match. 

    • Like (+1) 2
  5. I have been reading that many think Devonte Wyatt is the better prospect vs. Davis, and he should be there.  I also believe we need to pick a fast corner within the first two picks, our secondary is not fast.  It is covered up by our scheme and the professionalism of the players we have.

    • Like (+1) 4
  6. Maybe so, but Woolen ]has little to do with the mock.  Put in any fast CB that will likely be laying around then and take out Woolen.  Points are:

     

    1.  We need to stop the run and push the pocket from the inside - Travis Jones;

     

    2. We need secondary speed desperately - Gordon and Woolen or others;

     

    3. The reason we couldn't run is because of bad line play, not because Singletary is no good (Tyler Smith); we also need a complimentary back (Haskins) and a slot replacement (potentially - thus Philips).  

     

    4. Still need more off the edge given the age of what we have (Mafe); 

     

    5. If we need another weapon or blocker on offense, we can get them as FAs given potential cap savings here (no need to pay a CB2 and potentially Star/Addison/Hughes gone).

  7. I believe the posts that recite "we had the number 1 defense" are, respectfully, misguided.  We had major problems stopping the run all year.  We have to (and I believe will) sign Harry because he made major progress vs. the run late.  Star is not a long-term answer - not available enough, paid too much, getting old.  In addition to run problems, many of our games were against incompetent QBs that could not threaten us through the air.  And the Chiefs game showed that speed can beat our system and our DBs.  You want offense?  Don't tie up $10 million in Star and many millions more in a CB 2 (who may have to be a CB 1 until Tre is fully healthy).

     

    We need to answer what this year showed about our defense in a couple of ways:  Beefy inside dudes that can both stop the run AND collapse the pocket from the inside.  Inside push will maximize our numerous picks on DEs and Ed Oliver -- we need to unsettle the QB quickly and flush him to the ends (whomever Bean likes among Mathis, Wyatt, Travis Jones, Jordan Davis, Winfrey) and second, we desperately need speed in the secondary (whomever Beane likes of people like Gordon, McDuffie, McReary etc) that will also allow us to maximize the coverage skills of Tre White and our excellent but ageing safeties.  Then worry about offense.  Scheme and the professionalism of Levi Wallace let us get by with a CB #1 (Levi) who runs about a 4.7 in the 40.  Time ran out on that in the playoffs.  Whether we keep Levi or not, I feel we need two fast corners, one early and one late that we can develop (in my draft, Woolen).  An excellent Star replacement and a top CB2 on cheap contracts are massive help for the offense.  Both in getting the ball back and allowing us the money to get proven talent where needed (Kirk in the slot?)

  8. Mafe is still projected as a third rounder post Senior Bowl.  He looked good in that game, that is why I took him there!  Woolen, who knows, you might be right.  We got Kyler Gordon, if you think Woolen is gone stick in a random developmental CB with athletic upside.

     

  9. Could be.  They were there where I picked 'em on PFF, but maybe they did not adjust for Senior Bowl

    .

    Even if the players are different, the simulations made me think move down is key.  Not a lot of difference I see in picks 25-40.

     

  10. And I saw that I had a "notification" that someone commented on one of my old posts.  Funny, I remember typing this.  Even a blind dog sees it right once in a while:

     

    April 2018

    So stoked.  Feel we got better talent at 7 and 16 than Browns got at 1 & 4.  Allen is by all accounts a worker, he has elite arm talent, great running skills and ENORMOUS hands.  Lighted up if you had a man crush on another - he is now our man!  

    Lighten

     

     

    1 minute ago, whorlnut said:

    Another year of waiting till the third to take offense. No thanks. 

    We had and have plenty of offense to win.  D kept us out of the dance.  And we get lots of offense help in this mock - read up on Tyler Smith, Haskins is a horse, read up on Philips - Beasley reprised.  Lots of help for an offense that doesn't need lots of help in this draft.

    • Agree 2
×
×
  • Create New...