Nice work Wizard. As a meteorologist with some statistical training, I appreciate the attempt to predict the unpredictable. But one thing that bothers me is that many of the mock drafts aren't truly independent (a few posters brought this up in a different way). For instance, I find it funny how everybody put Bradford #1 after it came out that Adam Schefter, a few weeks ago, said he thinks the Rams could make him #1 overall. Before that, most of the mock drafts I saw had him going to WASH or even falling to us. You probably know to account for this already, but I think this is a big limiting factor with applying some of the statistical tools to these data. Having said that, it's some very nice work and a refreshing attempt to try to gain more insight into the process more than pure speculation.