loedward22
-
Posts
146 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by loedward22
-
-
NFL network's got the Bills logo wrong! It's missing the eye ball under the horn...
´
-
1
-
-
Logan Thomas might beat him to it. I believe Thomas has passed for TDs while playing QB, but not yet as a TE. This was the closest to it:
-
2 minutes ago, DCofNC said:
Damn, Tre is higher, helluva play by Hop
I don't think he is. It looks to me like his two hands are lower and in front of Hopkins' hands
-
I like his subtle commentary after some of the plays... his analysis of the net crew at about 15:10 and then of Gabe Davis avoiding the camera guy at about 19:10.
-
1 minute ago, dollars 2 donuts said:
Guys, how do you choose the $17 payment? It isn't clickable. Do they just ask you at the end?
Thank you, in advance.
it's selected by default. If you see the zubaz bright red and blue (not grayed out) then you've got the $17 option selected.
-
1
-
-
3 hours ago, whatdrought said:
Okay, I want to beat them even more now...
absolutely. Russel Wilson is a gigantic douche bag. So easy to root against him.
-
1
-
2
-
-
3 hours ago, Justin C said:
I could see the Patriots pulling out the Navy triple option all game Sunday With no WRs, windy conditions and Cam's arm shot, I could see them pulling out something like that and running the ball 40+ times.
Had the exact same thought. There was an article (sorry it's behind a paywall) in the Washington Post earlier this year about Bellichick studying the Navy offense...
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, JetsFan20 said:
Jets are fully healthy at home and getting 13.5 pts against banged up Bills.
Says something about the state of your franchise...
-
8 hours ago, Coach Tuesday said:
The left shoulder is preventing Josh from driving through his throws. That’s my theory.
Interesting.... He hasn't really been the same since that injury.
-
4 hours ago, Cruiserplayer said:
Was Cam wearing ankle weights today?
That was the lingering effects of his viral infection.
-
1 hour ago, RiotAct said:
the Chiefs will not drop 7 touchdowns on us. Book it.
Hope you’re right
-
This game is the equivalent of our 2017 game agains NO. 49-10 Chiefs.
-
I hope we get him... but how cool is it that we’re even being considered. I don’t think we’re in the mix even last year.
-
1
-
-
4 hours ago, Chemical said:
On the plus side we have KC next week and it’s not like the D can be beat more than every time
no... but they can be beat every time FASTER!
-
33 minutes ago, JoshAllenHasBigHands said:
I feel like my original comment is getting a bit misconstrued. I dont think the Bills will forfeit.
This is how I'm feeling right now too. I don't think they'll forfeit. I just won't be shocked if they do.
-
It's not going to shock me if we forfeit this game. The team might take a vote, and if more players want to sit out and not get paid than want to play and risk it...
-
5
-
-
1 hour ago, FlaFitz1 said:
Is that a Bills player in the picture behind him? Thurman maybe?
no, that's Barry Sanders
-
1 minute ago, Mango said:
I would assume a shortened season includes a reschedule. I highly doubt division games are going anywhere.According to the PFT article (take it for what it's worth) the reschedule would cut the divisional schedule for every team down to one:
"As one coach mapped it out, teams would play their division rivals only once, and one of their interconference games would be scrapped."
-
1
-
-
14 minutes ago, 1ManRaid said:
A shorter season hurts the teams who started poorly more than the ones who started well, as it gives trailing contenders less time to catch up. Also less game experience for young players/backups on tanking or rebuilding teams.
I think it would hurt the Bills a little though, because 2 of the 4 games which would be removed from their schedule would be against the Dolphins and Jets...
-
Just now, ndirish1978 said:
Why did they postpone the game just because of Cam? If he pulled a hamstring they wouldn't postpone the game. I presume they are expecting more pats players to test positive now.
timing. they were having to fly today and didn't want to make the problem way worse by having all these guys board a plane together.
-
1 minute ago, SCBills said:
I’ll never understand why some are so eager to go straight to the worst case scenario. It’s frustrating to read stuff like this, especially as I’m watching Florida vs South Carolina, with fans in the stands... but yea, NFL is going to cancel the season over a Week 4 hiccup....
It's pessimism. I'm naturally pessimistic and recognize when I'm having pessimistic thoughts and still can't do anything to stop it...
-
1 minute ago, DabillsDaBillsDaBills said:
50/50 actually is conclusive per the NFL rulebook. In the event of a simultaneous catch the tie goes to the offense.
- If a pass is caught simultaneously by two eligible opponents, and both players retain it, the ball belongs to the passers. It is not a simultaneous catch if a player gains control first and an opponent subsequently gains joint control. If the ball is muffed after simultaneous touching by two such players, all the players of the passing team become eligible to catch the loose ball.
I understand that being the case live, but once something has been called an interception and they have to review it, then it seems to me like the standard has changed (as it now needs to be conclusive).... Is there any precedence for this situation and if so how was it handled?
-
2 hours ago, Coach Tuesday said:
There is seriously no point to instant replay if it can’t get a basic call like that correct. None.I haven't heard this question discussed anywhere (TV, post game radio, nor on here). If they call it an interception on the field, don't they need conclusive evidence to overturn it? Therefore the problem was them calling it an interception on the field, and there not being anything conclusive to overturn it. From every angle they showed it was a fifty fifty which is the opposite of conclusive...
-
12 hours ago, GETTOTHE50 said:
he’s got that shady mccoy swag. I ❤️ DiggsGood comparison... I hadn't put that together yet but you are spot on.
-
1
-
Pro Tip: Change Link Behavior
in The Stadium Wall Archives
Posted · Edited by loedward22
I love the idea, but I saved the option to go to "Take me to the beginning" and I'm still going to the end of threads when I click on a link for the first time. What am I doing wrong?edit - I figured out what's going on. When I click a link from "The Stadium Wall" section on the landing page it still takes me to the end of a thread. But clicking a link from within "The Stadium Wall" it takes me to the beginning... I guess that makes sense because I'm not recognized by username on the landing page but once I'm on the inside I'm recognized by username.