Magox

That's not what he was referring to, lemming.

Demonstrably doesn't mean what you think it means, lemming.

It wasn't that difficult.

And you are equaling as entertaining as posting as GreggyT the lemming.

Says the lemming.

No, what's idiotic is that you are one of the many lemmings who believes that Jon Stewart is only a comedian.

So let's revisit my original post. He shapes opinions. Liberal opinions. He gets invited to the White House a few times to help push the president's policy proposals, and he obliges.

I'm not conflating anything, you're the one who believes that Stewart is only a comedian. Most of us know better. He also purposely shapes opinions. But you don't see that.

Maybe, but let's not pretend that Stewart believes that he is only a comedian and that he doesn't realize that what he says helps shape his viewers opinions.

I didn't say he was pretending to be a comedian, just that he's pretending to ONLY be a comedian. If you don't believe that he also tries to influence opinions and outcomes, then we really can't go too much further here with this conversation. I suppose he met up with the president at the Oval office for some comedic tips.

Actually, Stewart also pretends to just be a comedian, however he knows that many of his viewers get their "news" from him. He's not an idiot and he understands that he shapes his viewers opinion much the same way that Fox does theirs.

No it didn't ya twit, it began before that.

Interesting that the left wing Fact check decides to provide context for the decline in the labor participation rate, but not for the FB meme positive tidbits of the recovery. In any case Click for images. Although it is true, that the declining participation rate was already heading down it is also true that the pace of those declines have only steepened since B.O took office. It is also true, that despite the claims that the retiring of the baby boomers has contributed, fact is those between the ages of 16-54 have been leaving the workforce at the essentially the same rate as the "retiring baby boomers". Bottom line, there are structural issues with the baby boomers, but the weak economy is also a huge contributing factor.

John Stewart is funny as hell but make no mistake, he is for Liberals as what Fox is for Republicans, a cheerleader for the party and causes he supports.

He don't like those kinda facts. You didn't rebut ****....All you did was post essentially what is a fb meme for left wing retards.

Why not just post a FB meme? You know those meme's that sound really cool lacking in any sort of context. The fact that you posted an occupy democrats link says more about you than anything else.

Good stuff, OC!

Regardless of how anyone wants to interpret the article, there is some hard data that you can come away with from the polling results regarding who Trump's supporters are. I take more stock on the data than anything else.

Funny you say that, the candidate you support, if he had his way the economy would fall into a tailspin and the middle class would be the hardest hit. Bernie, without doubt is the worst candidate in the entire field for the middle class. Ironically, he'd be the best candidate to slow down illegal immigration, simply because the economy would be so ****ty, illegal immigrants would stay where they are or look elsewhere, because there would be less opportunities. Europe 2.0 A vote for Bernie is a vote for slowing down illegal immigration

Simply put, prices of most things were overvalued and now the government of China is tampering with the markets with all these restrictions etc. in order to attempt to put more "order" in the markets and it's backfiring, spooking investors and they are bailing.

I understand what you are saying, but I believe the main point of the article was to show who the supporters of Trump happen to be. I've read it three times now, and to your point I believe there is an undertone that speaks to that. But it's definitely a secondary and not the primary point of the article.

I couldn't disagree with you more. Jeb in my view, along with Kasich understand the issues more so than anyone else on the debate stage. All the anecdotal evidence of how Jeb performs in live settings in Townhalls, shows that people come away impressed with his mastery of the issues. In regards to your first point, yes in the first few states when there are so many candidates, with 20% support he could end up winning a state or two. Once the candidates begin to dwindle down, those unfavorable numbers will begin to matter a lot more.

How is it BS? when its simply pointing out facts. It's not making a case one way or another, all the article does which makes sense is connect the dots. It simply states that the people who are voting for Trump tend to be less educated and are against immigration reform. That's not a sleight, that's simply reporting what they see in their polling data. No one is saying there is anything wrong with being less educated, Democrats have shown to have had lower IQ scores than Repubs , but that's besides the point. A lot of people are wondering, who are Trump's supporters? That's a legitimate question considering all the hoopla around Trump. So this article delves into their polling data and there is a sensible explanation to it. I'm not gonna lie, as soon as I read the headline, I was thinking Oh boy, here we go again, some article that was written to caste Repubs in a negative light. But then after reading it, I didn't come away with that whatsoever.

He's twice as unpopular as he is popular....Just sayin'