Preston Ridlehuber

I'll put up $100 to the charity of anyone's choice if the wording isn't as Andy's says it is. All you people have to do is go away if Andy's version is correct.

Keep adjusting that wording and keep trying to convince yourself and your minions that now Andy Roth is lying. We will you go away if a tape appears to refute your lies?

This can't be true because I was told that everyone heard the same thing word for word even though nobody remembers the exact wording!

One final attempt at an intelligent response. This is what OC says he said, "I don't care about the Bills that much. But, it's something I have to talk about because I have a job that requires me to talk about sports in Buffalo and a lot of people care about the Bills. That is a far cry to what the original poster posted. It has never been a secret that the Bills in specific and the NFL in general ranks about fourth or fifth in his pecking order. Without hearing the show, and no, they don't audio vault the whole show, I am going to guess that he dredded talking draft, especially on a 85 degree day, but I don't know for sure so I'll defer to whatever memory OC has of it. It doesn't change my contention that the original post was based on an incorrect assumption that colored the tone of his attempt to paraphrase. That is that instead of representing the tone as not his favorite subject today, the tone was represented as something he hates doing on a daily basis.

At one point I actually thought there was potential for an intelligent conversation with you but I guess I was wrong. Sorry to have wasted your time. You can go to bed content that you won. The search goes on for intelligent Bills talk.

So apparently he didn't say he moved here, correct? Did he say he could care less if hte Bills win? Your quote is quite a bit short of the original post and since you don't want me to take it out of context and you seem to have a clear memory of what he said, why don't you tell me what led up to his statement. Speaking of answering questions, any response to the screening question?

At least that qualifies as an opinion which can't be right or wrong as opposed to an incorrect assessment of someone you don't know.

Coward?

On WI

Did I really say something about screening calls? You brought it up twice, but I am pretty sure you are mistaken. Or maybe my wife is right when she says I'm getting old.

The guy lived here all his life. There is absolutely know way he said anything like "I moved here, this is just a job." There is no doubt that football is not his favorite subject and he sometimes doesn't like to talk about but lets either listen better or stop making stuff up.

So you made an inaccurate assumption and then made up a whole new fact to fit what you wanted to post about his show? So when you said he said he could care less what happens on Sunday and that he only follows them because its his job, you made that up, correct?

You are asking me questions a third grader could answer. Maybe you can get "your people" to answer them. If you have real questions, fire away but I am not Mike Schopp and have no media affiliation if thats all you are trying to get at.

"I could care less what happens on Sundays or how the Bills do, I moved here, this is just a job. The only reason I follow them is because it is my job to talk about them. You said Schopp said the above line in your original post. In post 34 you said He said, "I didn't grow up here rooting for the Bills." Which is the truth?

Didn't say I always agreed with him. I wouldn't put Ritcher on either but I can understand the argument for his inclusion. Since we are going back and forth and this thread was based on a lie, why don't we change it up. Do you think Lofton deserved a spot in the 50 year team?

What is the point? We are on the third page of a thread that the original poster now admits he fabricated!

As they say, at least spell the name right.

So are you now saying that he didn't say " I could care less about what happens on Sundays and that wholesentence after that??

I did answer the question.

And since you brought it up, you will notice that the Bills never refer to it as anniversary. They call it the 50th season . Chris Brown, Mark Gaughan and others constantly put in the word into their releases.

Just calling out a ridiculous post. Whenever anybody qualifies a post or a phone call for that matter with "I usually defend this" or "I've always been a fan of but" you know where its heading. We have now spent how much time discussing a statement which obviously never occurred.

Its semantics. The Canuck players know that Luongo is their captain and leader although he cannot have the same responsibilities as a regular on ice captain. In essence that is all Mike was suggesting Hasek was. Vancouver was just a little more progressive in their thinking then the average NHL team. Also, I am pretty sure, but admit I may be wrong, that the NHL does recognize Luongo as the captain.

Why all this talk of an " incentive laden" contract? The smart thing to do is trade a conditional pick for him. You inherit his contract minus the bonus money and if he looks like a stiff in camp you cut him and it doesn't cost you anything but per diem money during camp. Even the smallest "incentive deal" is going to cost you some bonus money.

Now there's a well thought out rebuke. I guess I stand corrected.

Although Vancouver proved that Mike was right and McManus wrong.