Helmet_hair Posted January 15, 2009 Share Posted January 15, 2009 Other proposals throughout the document would push for use of alternative energies (solar, geothermal and wind), conservation, electric cars and urban agriculture. Other more Draconian regulations throughout the document would: * Limit waterfront development in the name of water sustainability, * Require two trees to be planted if one is removed from your property * Limit the “number/density of fast food outlets and drive-through windows” in the name of public health * Discourage individual parking options to promote public transportation usage Coming to a fascist city state near you. A classic Führerprinzip system. Sieg Heil! Sieg Heil! WE ARE SCREWED! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PastaJoe Posted January 15, 2009 Share Posted January 15, 2009 Madison, Wis. has a new regime? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boomer860 Posted January 15, 2009 Share Posted January 15, 2009 Coming to a fascist city state near you. A classic Führerprinzip system. Sieg Heil! Sieg Heil! WE ARE SCREWED! Let's not forget the queers being allowed to openly serve in the military. Support the military , yea right , destroy it is more like it . It will not be proud to serve . And Barney Frank can be a General in the new militarly Rangers, the Rump Rangers. The Tards are flocking to the recruiting offices. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Helmet_hair Posted January 15, 2009 Author Share Posted January 15, 2009 Madison, Wis. has a new regime? Close, but it’s a little less concrete and more abstract then that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PastaJoe Posted January 15, 2009 Share Posted January 15, 2009 Let's not forget the queers being allowed to openly serve in the military. Support the military , yea right , destroy it is more like it . It will not be proud to serve . And Barney Frank can be a General in the new militarly Rangers, the Rump Rangers. The Tards are flocking to the recruiting offices. Yeah, because all the gays that do and have served in the military are less patriotic and don't follow the codes of conduct like straight soldiers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boomer860 Posted January 15, 2009 Share Posted January 15, 2009 Yeah, because all the gays that do and have served in the military are less patriotic and don't follow the codes of conduct like straight soldiers. Wel Tard if you like it so much go enlist . Don't drop the soap Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RkFast Posted January 15, 2009 Share Posted January 15, 2009 Let's not forget the queers being allowed to openly serve in the military. Support the military , yea right , destroy it is more like it . It will not be proud to serve . And Barney Frank can be a General in the new militarly Rangers, the Rump Rangers. The Tards are flocking to the recruiting offices. I wouldnt sweat it. Two gay men get busted for relations and they will be out on their asses just like a hetero couple would be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Helmet_hair Posted January 15, 2009 Author Share Posted January 15, 2009 Who cares about the fudge packers, I'm more concerned with the fact that I may be required to grow fescue on my tweed duds to offset my carbon footprint! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted January 15, 2009 Share Posted January 15, 2009 Gee, where are all the left wingers who whine about civil rights when we are torturing some POS terrorist? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boomer860 Posted January 15, 2009 Share Posted January 15, 2009 I wouldnt sweat it. Two gay men get busted for relations and they will be out on their asses just like a hetero couple would be. Which one gets excused from combat duty ? Who uses the mens room womens room and etc ? Do you think a hard a$$ed guy would join the Military? Queers lack the discipline of the natural order and personal discipline period. The Military will become ineffective and a joke. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boomer860 Posted January 15, 2009 Share Posted January 15, 2009 Who cares about the fudge packers, I'm more concerned with the fact that I may be required to grow fescue on my tweed duds to offset my carbon footprint! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PastaJoe Posted January 15, 2009 Share Posted January 15, 2009 Wel Tard if you like it so much go enlist . Don't drop the soap Based on your personal experience in the showers? Lighten up, Francis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boomer860 Posted January 15, 2009 Share Posted January 15, 2009 Based on your personal experience in the showers? Lighten up, Francis. Like I said Harriet go enlist . The military is looking for Tards like you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Big Cat Posted January 15, 2009 Share Posted January 15, 2009 Gee, where are all the left wingers who whine about civil rights when we are torturing some POS terrorist? Classic Katie! Requiring someone to plant a tree IS just like electrocuting somebody's testicles! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RkFast Posted January 15, 2009 Share Posted January 15, 2009 Classic Katie! Requiring someone to plant a tree IS just like electrocuting somebody's testicles! So is feeding a terrorist warm (not hot) rice pilaf. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrew in CA Posted January 15, 2009 Share Posted January 15, 2009 Classic Katie! Requiring someone to plant a tree IS just like electrocuting somebody's testicles! You're right that it's not that extreme, but c'mon, this is a ridiculous measure. Requiring someone to plant 2 trees? The government should encourage it with a reward, like a tax break, but to mandate it? This is the reason people do not want to take action against global warming; once the government starts mandating its citizens to act responsible for global health- and get away with it- what is the next step? Mandating citizens to limit their intake of saturated fat? Mandating cars with less than 15 mpg be taken off the road? It's a slippery slope.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam Posted January 15, 2009 Share Posted January 15, 2009 And thats worse than the executive branch absorbing power from the other branches, torturing in the name of entertainment and revenge and spying on civilians. Everyone says they don't like what is going on and something needs to be done, then they sit on their &%&%&% waiting for somebody else to do something Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted January 15, 2009 Share Posted January 15, 2009 You're right that it's not that extreme, but c'mon, this is a ridiculous measure. Requiring someone to plant 2 trees? The government should encourage it with a reward, like a tax break, but to mandate it? This is the reason people do not want to take action against global warming; once the government starts mandating its citizens to act responsible for global health- and get away with it- what is the next step? Mandating citizens to limit their intake of saturated fat? Mandating cars with less than 15 mpg be taken off the road? It's a slippery slope.... No, he's not right. He's a moron who whines about nebulous things that may or may not be happening in the GWOT as though it's impacting him directly. But then he dismisses it when his government is considering forcing him to act a certain way at his own expense, on his own property. Thus his responses are limited to laughably stupid comparisons that demonstrate how poorly he understands the issue. Just unreal how clueless people have become when this kind of crap passes for normal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PastaJoe Posted January 15, 2009 Share Posted January 15, 2009 Like I said Harriet go enlist . The military is looking for Tards like you. Sorry Francis, I'm past the enlistment age. You'll have to share your soap with someone else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Helmet_hair Posted January 15, 2009 Author Share Posted January 15, 2009 Classic Katie! Requiring someone to plant a tree IS just like electrocuting somebody's testicles! Could you please provide me with the real proof that our government under the direction of our president is torturing people by electrocution otherwise, STFU! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts