Hazed and Amuzed Posted September 18, 2008 Posted September 18, 2008 In fact if I remember reading correctly those drill's were of planes going into the WORLD TRADE CENTER not just some building.
Hazed and Amuzed Posted September 18, 2008 Posted September 18, 2008 Da Big Man said: And again nice breasts!!! P.S. Never win is a poor excuse, we should just through up our hands and quit, lets just let them go Jihad on us. F it right. I missed this before. Thank you and no I wasn't suggesting F it. Just a different approach because just blowing sh-- up isn't working.
Da Big Man Posted September 18, 2008 Author Posted September 18, 2008 buffalo782 said: I missed this before. Thank you and no I wasn't suggesting F it. Just a different approach because just blowing sh-- up isn't working. We are not blowing sh-- up we are spending yours and my tax dollar to rebuild and rehabilitate that country. Some children are going to school for the first time. Women have more rights then ever. Good things are happening and the resisance is getting smaller. I would expect a suicide bomber to blow something up once and awhile they are pissed, cause they are losing. They don't fight with rules, we do, thats why we are slow to finish this.
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted September 18, 2008 Posted September 18, 2008 yellowlinesandarmadillos said: But don't think Ron Paul is the answer, doesn't have the temperament to pull people together. Pulling people together is a crock of horse-shat.
Chilly Posted September 19, 2008 Posted September 19, 2008 Da Big Man said: We are not blowing sh-- up we are spending yours and my tax dollar to rebuild and rehabilitate that country. Some children are going to school for the first time. Women have more rights then ever. Good things are happening and the resisance is getting smaller. I would expect a suicide bomber to blow something up once and awhile they are pissed, cause they are losing. They don't fight with rules, we do, thats why we are slow to finish this. ur butt has more rights than ever
Booster4324 Posted September 19, 2008 Posted September 19, 2008 BlueFire said: ur butt has more rights than ever Would you hush; every time he talks, someone votes for a moderate.
Chilly Posted September 19, 2008 Posted September 19, 2008 Booster4324 said: Would you hush; every time he talks, someone votes for a moderate. what moderate?
molson_golden2002 Posted September 19, 2008 Posted September 19, 2008 BlueFire said: what moderate? Obama is a moderate
Chilly Posted September 19, 2008 Posted September 19, 2008 molson_golden2002 said: Obama is a moderate
erynthered Posted September 19, 2008 Posted September 19, 2008 BlueFire said: Yeah, didnt you know? Obama being one of most liberal voters in the Senate makes him a moderate. Geesh.
molson_golden2002 Posted September 19, 2008 Posted September 19, 2008 erynthered said: Yeah, didnt you know? Obama being one of most liberal voters in the Senate makes him a moderate. Geesh. According to the ding dongs that rate Senators for Republican political consumption, any Senator nominated by Democrats would instantly become the "most liberal Senator in Congress." Kerry was in 2004 as I remember and then suddenly Obama leaped ahead of him.
finknottle Posted September 19, 2008 Posted September 19, 2008 molson_golden2002 said: According to the ding dongs that rate Senators for Republican political consumption, any Senator nominated by Democrats would instantly become the "most liberal Senator in Congress." Kerry was in 2004 as I remember and then suddenly Obama leaped ahead of him. Sadly, you touch on what I think is a key problem: the Right has spent so much time crying wolf about moderate Democrats (like Clinton and the DNC), that now that there is an opponent who truly deserves to be painted as the most liberal candidate nominated in a century, it falls on deaf ears.
finknottle Posted September 19, 2008 Posted September 19, 2008 JoeSixPack said: Pulling people together is a crock of horse-shat. But the ability to lead and get things done isn't. And Paul has shown no ability to get things done on the national stage, and was unable to even influence the issue agenda in the Republican Primaries. That's a recipe for disaster for any president, particularly one facing a hostile congress.
YellowLinesandArmadillos Posted September 19, 2008 Posted September 19, 2008 molson_golden2002 said: According to the ding dongs that rate Senators for Republican political consumption, any Senator nominated by Democrats would instantly become the "most liberal Senator in Congress." Kerry was in 2004 as I remember and then suddenly Obama leaped ahead of him. And here we go again, dancing around the right and left stripper poles Let me see if I can shorten the rest of the posts. Cheney....v. Hillary McSame....v. Osama Haliburtin...v. Pelosi Enron...v. Liberal News Media Faux Ewes...v. Socialist Oxy Boy...v. Flag Burners Whatever....
molson_golden2002 Posted September 19, 2008 Posted September 19, 2008 finknottle said: Sadly, you touch on what I think is a key problem: the Right has spent so much time crying wolf about moderate Democrats (like Clinton and the DNC), that now that there is an opponent who truly deserves to be painted as the most liberal candidate nominated in a century, it falls on deaf ears. So Obama is more liberal than LBJ? McGovern?
Da Big Man Posted September 20, 2008 Author Posted September 20, 2008 Booster4324 said: Would you hush; every time he talks, someone votes for a moderate. I can't change any of your minds, after all sheep will be sheep. I am just here to gloat over an early runaway victory by McCain/Palin 08'. Oh yeah, Obama, a moderate, thats hillarious. Obama is Lib as Lib could get!!!!
Da Big Man Posted September 20, 2008 Author Posted September 20, 2008 molson_golden2002 said: So Obama is more liberal than LBJ? McGovern? Yes, but I think thats obvious. Different times, different generation.
Alaska Darin Posted September 20, 2008 Posted September 20, 2008 Da Big Man said: over an early runaway victory by McCain/Palin 08'. Oh yeah, Obama, a moderate, Yeah, because they won't continue to spend us into the third world while continuing to erode liberty at a staggering pace.
Da Big Man Posted September 20, 2008 Author Posted September 20, 2008 Alaska Darin said: Yeah, because they won't continue to spend us into the third world while continuing to erode liberty at a staggering pace. Erode liberty, come on! I enjoy liberty everyday. Come up with something a little better. Name one liberty that has been eroded.
Recommended Posts