Turk Posted March 19, 2008 Share Posted March 19, 2008 I just looked at a site were its is projected that we will recieve a 4th (Gandy) and a 7th (Davis) is it possible that we could trade down maybe with Philly getting there first and Lito for our 1st and a 4th? We still get our wide out another vet Db, Te in the 2nd, C in the 3rd. Will anybody below or above us offer a high 2 or 3 to trade down? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuckincincy Posted March 19, 2008 Share Posted March 19, 2008 I just looked at a site were its is projected that we will recieve a 4th (Gandy) and a 7th (Davis) is it possible that we could trade down maybe with Philly getting there first and Lito for our 1st and a 4th? We still get our wide out another vet Db, Te in the 2nd, C in the 3rd. Will anybody below or above us offer a high 2 or 3 to trade down? Comp picks can't be part of a trade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ndirish1978 Posted March 19, 2008 Share Posted March 19, 2008 CompensaTORY picks can't be, but he is talking about compensaTOEY, completely different! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flbillsfan#1 Posted March 19, 2008 Share Posted March 19, 2008 I just looked at a site were its is projected that we will recieve a 4th (Gandy) and a 7th (Davis) is it possible that we could trade down maybe with Philly getting there first and Lito for our 1st and a 4th? We still get our wide out another vet Db, Te in the 2nd, C in the 3rd. Will anybody below or above us offer a high 2 or 3 to trade down?I would offer a swap of #1's OR a 3rd or 4th for Sheppard nothing more. The Raiders only gave up a #2 & #6 for Hall. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buftex Posted March 19, 2008 Share Posted March 19, 2008 CompensaTORY picks can't be, but he is talking about compensaTOEY, completely different! What a dick! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
silvermike Posted March 19, 2008 Share Posted March 19, 2008 I know the rules say that compensatory picks can't be traded, but what keeps a team from just promising to draft a certain player, and then trade his rights for 'past considerations' or something like that? Would the trade be appealed and rejected? What's the justification for any of it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuckincincy Posted March 19, 2008 Share Posted March 19, 2008 I know the rules say that compensatory picks can't be traded, but what keeps a team from just promising to draft a certain player, and then trade his rights for 'past considerations' or something like that? Would the trade be appealed and rejected? Collusion? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts