SACKMARINO Posted October 1, 2006 Share Posted October 1, 2006 70/111 , 797 YARDS , 3 TD, 1 INT projected season stats: 280/444 , 3,188 YARDS, 12 TD, 4 INT NOT BAD!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I 90 Posted October 1, 2006 Share Posted October 1, 2006 280/444 , 3,188 YARDS, 12 TD, 4 INTNOT BAD!!! 791749[/snapback] Not bad, but WEIRD. 12 and 4 is impossible. They better let him off the leash or they'll keep struggling teams IN games for too long. And give me 12 more weekends of chest pains. . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corp000085 Posted October 1, 2006 Share Posted October 1, 2006 Not bad, but WEIRD. 12 and 4 is impossible. They better let him off the leash or they'll keep struggling teams IN games for too long. And give me 12 more weekends of chest pains. . 791787[/snapback] or 15 weeks... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Risin Posted October 1, 2006 Share Posted October 1, 2006 or 15 weeks... 791792[/snapback] Now you're talking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KRT88 Posted October 1, 2006 Share Posted October 1, 2006 70/111 , 797 YARDS , 3 TD, 1 INT projected season stats: 280/444 , 3,188 YARDS, 12 TD, 4 INT NOT BAD!!! 791749[/snapback] His completion % is good, his TD to Int rate is good (3-1 - not gonna stay that way) yard would be good. so far I am impressed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
outsidethebox Posted October 1, 2006 Share Posted October 1, 2006 I would be very happy with that. Except a few more TD's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted October 1, 2006 Share Posted October 1, 2006 Wonder if the Vice-Douche JDG will update his "Losman-meter" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daquixers_is_back Posted October 1, 2006 Share Posted October 1, 2006 Not bad, but WEIRD. 12 and 4 is impossible. They better let him off the leash or they'll keep struggling teams IN games for too long. And give me 12 more weekends of chest pains. . 791787[/snapback] How is that impossible??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MDH Posted October 1, 2006 Share Posted October 1, 2006 Not bad, but WEIRD. 12 and 4 is impossible. They better let him off the leash or they'll keep struggling teams IN games for too long. And give me 12 more weekends of chest pains. . 791787[/snapback] For the most part I liked the playcalling today. The 3rd and goal running play from the 5 yard line was a bit much though. There are ways to protect your young QB while still giving him a chance to make a play. A sack there isn't going to kill you only a turnover will. Give the guy a chance to make a play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I 90 Posted October 1, 2006 Share Posted October 1, 2006 How is that impossible??? 791922[/snapback] 12 and 4 is a Warren Moon on the disabled list in week six type number. It has never been put up by any quarterback at any time in history. It is not even a Bob Griese/Bart Starr old timey number. Four interceptions in one game is more likely ( I just punched myself in the head for saying it). . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MDH Posted October 2, 2006 Share Posted October 2, 2006 12 and 4 is a Warren Moon on the disabled list in week six type number. It has never been put up by any quarterback at any time in history. It is not even a Bob Griese/Bart Starr old timey number. Four interceptions in one game is more likely ( I just punched myself in the head for saying it). . 791960[/snapback] I think you'll see more TDs and more INTs than that by season's end. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daquixers_is_back Posted October 2, 2006 Share Posted October 2, 2006 12 and 4 is a Warren Moon on the disabled list in week six type number. It has never been put up by any quarterback at any time in history. It is not even a Bob Griese/Bart Starr old timey number. Four interceptions in one game is more likely ( I just punched myself in the head for saying it). . 791960[/snapback] I have no idea what you are talking about ... are you saying that it is impossible for Losman to throw for 12 TD's and 4 INT's .. like the NFL automatically skips from 11 TD's to 13 and from 3 INT's to 5 ??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MDH Posted October 2, 2006 Share Posted October 2, 2006 I have no idea what you are talking about ... are you saying that it is impossible for Losman to throw for 12 TD's and 4 INT's .. like the NFL automatically skips from 11 TD's to 13 and from 3 INT's to 5 ??? 791989[/snapback] I think he's just saying that you don't usually see QBs who have that kind of TD/INT ratio throw so few TDs, as they're usually the elite QBs. If a QB throws 12 TDs it usually goes along with 15 INTs or some other similar number. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daquixers_is_back Posted October 2, 2006 Share Posted October 2, 2006 I think he's just saying that you don't usually see QBs who have that kind of TD/INT ratio throw so few TDs, as they're usually the elite QBs. If a QB throws 12 TDs it usually goes along with 15 INTs or some other similar number. 791991[/snapback] OK then ... not impossible Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I 90 Posted October 2, 2006 Share Posted October 2, 2006 I think you'll see more TDs and more INTs than that by season's end. 791982[/snapback] It is an interesting projection just the same. A quarter season... bears witness to how conservative the Jauron era might be. They played all four like they wanted to and could have won all four. . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts