linksfiend Posted January 17, 2006 Share Posted January 17, 2006 All year the picture quality has been poor - last night was just awful I think we need to prompt MSG for something better. Email them at msgnetpr@msgnetwork.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inkman Posted January 17, 2006 Share Posted January 17, 2006 Last night was mostly because they play in the dark in edmonton. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoachChuckDickerson Posted January 17, 2006 Share Posted January 17, 2006 All year the picture quality has been poor - last night was just awful I think we need to prompt MSG for something better. Email them at msgnetpr@msgnetwork.com 570890[/snapback] For the home games it is good. For the away games we are victims of the opposing teams camera crew and transmission, which is typically brutal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
X. Benedict Posted January 17, 2006 Share Posted January 17, 2006 All year the picture quality has been poor - last night was just awful I think we need to prompt MSG for something better. Email them at msgnetpr@msgnetwork.com 570890[/snapback] I think those were the Edmonton cameras. It looked strange off the bat cameras shooting over the players benches, did you check out the Power Play angle with the camera coming from the behind the goal? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony P Posted January 17, 2006 Share Posted January 17, 2006 Last night was mostly because they play in the dark in edmonton. 570933[/snapback] Center Ice feed, direct from the Canadian broadcast, was very good IMO. Didn't notice any poor lighting conditions and in fact, the camera angles brought you pretty close to the action. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
linksfiend Posted January 17, 2006 Author Share Posted January 17, 2006 I think those were the Edmonton cameras. It looked strange off the bat cameras shooting over the players benches, did you check out the Power Play angle with the camera coming from the behind the goal? 571099[/snapback] I don't think that's it. I think it's MSG chintzing on the broadcast because some at work told me the Center Ice feed was excellent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted January 18, 2006 Share Posted January 18, 2006 I don't think that's it. I think it's MSG chintzing on the broadcast because some at work told me the Center Ice feed was excellent. 571373[/snapback] I watched the Center Ice feed. It sucked, as all broadcasts from Rexall Place do. Has nothing to do with MSG - as if they actually have their own camera crew that follows the teams around. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
X. Benedict Posted January 18, 2006 Share Posted January 18, 2006 I watched the Center Ice feed. It sucked, as all broadcasts from Rexall Place do. Has nothing to do with MSG - as if they actually have their own camera crew that follows the teams around. 571579[/snapback] That's what I figured. It is not like each broadcaster has their own cameras set up. I think that MSG does a decent job, now if you are watching Anaheim or San Jose at home, that is a different matter. Generally Edmonton is surprisingly bad for a Canadian city. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts