Mickey Posted November 10, 2005 Author Share Posted November 10, 2005 Yes. Let's take down as much of the current Administration as possible. GO MICK! 499161[/snapback] Why do you think the administration was involved in leaking this information? After all, this could constitute treason, why would you think the members of this administration could ever do such a thing? Couldn't this have been done by someone at the agency or an idiot congressman (we have no shortage of those)? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost of BiB Posted November 10, 2005 Share Posted November 10, 2005 This in no way would be in the best interests of the administration. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ASCI Posted November 10, 2005 Share Posted November 10, 2005 In the meantime, why don't you contemplate the wisdom of mocking political discussion while you engage in a political discussion yourself. While you're doing that, I'll go make you a salad. 499292[/snapback] No I'm here just to start sh-- like eneryone else is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mickey Posted November 10, 2005 Author Share Posted November 10, 2005 The words self-aggrandizement and delusional come to mind when reading this. 499259[/snapback] How is speaking well of someone else as CTM was doing, an act of self-aggrandizement? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mickey Posted November 10, 2005 Author Share Posted November 10, 2005 This in no way would be in the best interests of the administration. 499329[/snapback] The leak or the investigation called for by Frist and Hastert? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ASCI Posted November 10, 2005 Share Posted November 10, 2005 How is speaking well of someone else as CTM was doing, an act of self-aggrandizement? 499335[/snapback] I was referring to you, genius. Now stop shaking your fist and get back to work! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted November 10, 2005 Share Posted November 10, 2005 I was referring to you, genius. Now stop shaking your fist and get back to work! 499357[/snapback] I was self-aggrandizing Mickey? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost of BiB Posted November 10, 2005 Share Posted November 10, 2005 The leak or the investigation called for by Frist and Hastert? 499338[/snapback] The leak. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mickey Posted November 10, 2005 Author Share Posted November 10, 2005 I was referring to you, genius. Now stop shaking your fist and get back to work! 499357[/snapback] You quoted him and responded to his post. You said that the words "self-aggrandizement" came to mind as you read his post, a post that was complimentary to me. So you read a post by someone else and concluded that, I was engaging in self-aggrandizement. Yeah, makes sense. This is kind of a pattern for you isn't it? You post a bunch of gobbledy-gook and when it gets torn apart as such, you claim to have meant something else entirely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mickey Posted November 10, 2005 Author Share Posted November 10, 2005 The leak. 499411[/snapback] Wouldn't it benefit them if it was blamed on the other party? If a Republican leaked the information as was postulated by Trent Lott, what would be the motivation there? Other than thinking it would be blamed on the democrats, I am not sure why a Republican senator would do that but lord knows I don't understand Republicans anyway so who knows. I don't see anyway to stop leaks other than to investigate them, find the sources and punish them accordingly. Its one thing to leak that so-and-so is bopping his intern or getting a kick-back on a contract, quite another to blab on something like this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost of BiB Posted November 10, 2005 Share Posted November 10, 2005 Wouldn't it benefit them if it was blamed on the other party? If a Republican leaked the information as was postulated by Trent Lott, what would be the motivation there? Other than thinking it would be blamed on the democrats, I am not sure why a Republican senator would do that but lord knows I don't understand Republicans anyway so who knows. I don't see anyway to stop leaks other than to investigate them, find the sources and punish them accordingly. Its one thing to leak that so-and-so is bopping his intern or getting a kick-back on a contract, quite another to blab on something like this. 499436[/snapback] It's not worth the damage done vs. the reward. No one is going to care about it at election time, pretty well don't care now. Inside the system though, this could result in some real problems policy wise, and also with allied relationships. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted November 10, 2005 Share Posted November 10, 2005 You quoted him and responded to his post. You said that the words "self-aggrandizement" came to mind as you read his post, a post that was complimentary to me. So you read a post by someone else and concluded that, I was engaging in self-aggrandizement. Yeah, makes sense. This is kind of a pattern for you isn't it? You post a bunch of gobbledy-gook and when it gets torn apart as such, you claim to have meant something else entirely. 499429[/snapback] It's not his fault, though. The Nazi Werewolves did it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mickey Posted November 10, 2005 Author Share Posted November 10, 2005 It's not his fault, though. The Nazi Werewolves did it. 499495[/snapback] Which proves once again that things really aren't so bad in....Iraq. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mickey Posted November 10, 2005 Author Share Posted November 10, 2005 It's not worth the damage done vs. the reward. No one is going to care about it at election time, pretty well don't care now. Inside the system though, this could result in some real problems policy wise, and also with allied relationships. 499464[/snapback] So.......the Republican leaders in both the House and the Senate call for an immediate investigation into the leak and then, after Senator Lott indicates the leaker may have been a Republican Senator, Republicans are now backing off from the demand for an investigation. Hmmm.....what in the world could be going on here? It is a puzzlement. Roberts tells Frist to back off on leak probe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Pan Posted November 10, 2005 Share Posted November 10, 2005 I was self-aggrandizing Mickey? 499401[/snapback] Shouldn't you two get a room for that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted November 10, 2005 Share Posted November 10, 2005 Which proves once again that things really aren't so bad in....Iraq. 499509[/snapback] I see where this is going now...pretty soon BiB's going to get bit by a telephone pole because Ed never provoked a dog in New Jersey... (Note: this post is in no way meant to self-aggrandize Mickey.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheTelephonePole Posted November 10, 2005 Share Posted November 10, 2005 I see where this is going now...pretty soon BiB's going to get bit by a telephone pole because Ed never provoked a dog in New Jersey... (Note: this post is in no way meant to self-aggrandize Mickey.) 499545[/snapback] Where'd he go? Send him my way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost of BiB Posted November 10, 2005 Share Posted November 10, 2005 I see where this is going now...pretty soon BiB's going to get bit by a telephone pole because Ed never provoked a dog in New Jersey... (Note: this post is in no way meant to self-aggrandize Mickey.) 499545[/snapback] Aw fugg...not AGAIN! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mickey Posted November 10, 2005 Author Share Posted November 10, 2005 I see where this is going now...pretty soon BiB's going to get bit by a telephone pole because Ed never provoked a dog in New Jersey... (Note: this post is in no way meant to self-aggrandize Mickey.) 499545[/snapback] too late, I already feel aggrandized, you can't take it back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mickey Posted November 10, 2005 Author Share Posted November 10, 2005 Aw fugg...not AGAIN! 499567[/snapback] Quick, somebody shut down this thread before its too late. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts