Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago Wow, shows where Trump's priorities are. What the F is in these files?
Joe Ferguson forever Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago (edited) 47 minutes ago, Trump_is_Mentally_fit said: Wow, shows where Trump's priorities are. What the F is in these files? Boebert has confirmed the meeting in the situation room. Bondi and Blanche were there. It has not been confirmed that Patel was there per CNN. Recall that Blanche conducted a "fact finding" interview with Maxwell. edit. Patel and Boni were confirmed there. Blanche not yet. Edited 1 hour ago by Joe Ferguson forever 1
SCBills Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago (edited) Trump should just release them given he campaigned on it, but a lot of innocent people are going to be destroyed by this. Edited 1 hour ago by SCBills
Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted 1 hour ago Author Posted 1 hour ago 1 minute ago, SCBills said: Trump should just release them given he campaigned on it, but a lot of innocent people are going to be destroyed by this. What innocent people?
Joe Ferguson forever Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 2 minutes ago, SCBills said: Trump should just release them given he campaigned on it, but a lot of innocent people are going to be destroyed by this. Why would innocent people be hurt? Why would innocent people be associated with Epstein after his first arrest? 2 minutes ago, Trump_is_Mentally_fit said: What innocent people? Maybe he means Bannon. That horse is out of the barn. 1
SCBills Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago (edited) 36 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: Why would innocent people be hurt? Why would innocent people be associated with Epstein after his first arrest? Maybe he means Bannon. That horse is out of the barn. It pains me how dumb some of you people can be. There are clearly people in the Epstein Files that didn’t engage in illegal activity. The Democrats already showed how disgusting they can be with this when they “redacted” Virginia Giuffre’s name and replaced it with (victim) in one of the releases today in an effort to make Trump look bad. In reality, she’s been discredited over Dershowitz and if we are to take her testimony seriously, it all but exonerates Trump. Which is, of course, why Democrats redacted her name. Yall can’t be this gullible.. really? Anyone who did something illegal with Epstein should of course be bright to light, but he ran in circles with a lot of people. A lot of people are named in the files. Doesn’t mean they did anything wrong simply by association. Edited 1 hour ago by SCBills 1
Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted 1 hour ago Author Posted 1 hour ago 3 minutes ago, SCBills said: It pains me how dumb some of you people can be. There are clearly people in the Epstein Files that didn’t engage in illegal activity. The Democrats already showed how disgusting they can be with this when they “redacted” Virginia Giuffre’s name and replaced it with (victim) in one of the releases today in an effort to make Trump look bad. In reality, she’s been discredited over Dershowitz and if we are to take her testimony seriously, it all but exonerates Trump. Which is, of course, why Democrats redacted her name. Yall can’t be this gullible.. really? Anyone who did something illegal with Epstein should of course be bright to light, but he ran in circles with a lot of people. A lot of people are named in the files. Doesn’t mean they did anything wrong simply by association. MAGA, anyone in MAGA, actually caring about people supposedly getting "hurt" is the stupidest thing anyone can say. No one believes it 1 1
SCBills Posted 59 minutes ago Posted 59 minutes ago 2 minutes ago, Trump_is_Mentally_fit said: MAGA, anyone in MAGA, actually caring about people supposedly getting "hurt" is the stupidest thing anyone can say. No one believes it You’re frothing at the mouth over Trump like a Neanderthal and can’t even think straight. What even is your post? You don’t respond to anything I said. It’s just slop regurgitated from a brain that can’t think past “Me hate Trump. Trump bad” caveman type discourse. 1 1
Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted 56 minutes ago Author Posted 56 minutes ago 2 minutes ago, SCBills said: You’re frothing at the mouth over Trump like a Neanderthal and can’t even think straight. What even is your post? You don’t respond to anything I said. It’s just slop regurgitated from a brain that can’t think past “Me hate Trump. Trump bad” caveman type discourse. Your point is just silly 1
Joe Ferguson forever Posted 56 minutes ago Posted 56 minutes ago 3 minutes ago, SCBills said: It pains me how dumb some of you people can be. There are clearly people in the Epstein Files that didn’t engage in illegal activity. The Democrats already showed how disgusting they can be with this when they “redacted” Virginia Giuffre’s name and replaced it with (victim) in one of the releases today in an effort to make Trump look bad. In reality, she’s been discredited over Dershowitz and if we are to take her testimony seriously, it all but exonerates Trump. Which is, of course, why Democrats redacted her name. Yall can’t be this gullible.. really? Anyone who did something illegal with Epstein should of course be bright to light, but he ran in circles with a lot of people. A lot of people are named in the files. Doesn’t mean they did anything wrong simply by association. If they did nothing wrong, they are not in any jeopardy. Epstein was convicted in 2007 on prostitution charges involving minors. What "innocent" person would have anything to do with him after that? redacting the victims name is actually protecting the innocent. So who is gullible?
JDHillFan Posted 39 minutes ago Posted 39 minutes ago 12 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: If they did nothing wrong, they are not in any jeopardy. I’ve seen this level of brilliance several times along the way. You should contact the people at this place and let them know they have been wasting their time. https://innocenceproject.org/ 1
Recommended Posts