Joe Ferguson forever Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 18 minutes ago, B-Man said: The Democrats’ Latest Trump-Epstein 'Bombshell' Actually Vindicates Trump Matt Margolis Democrats are scrambling to change the subject after caving on the government shutdown, and their latest stunt is hilariously transparent. On Wednesday, House Oversight Committee Democrats released emails from Jeffrey Epstein's estate that they claimed raised "serious questions about Donald Trump and his knowledge of Epstein's horrific crimes." The problem? The emails prove nothing of the sort. ABC News even admitted "The full context of these email exchanges is not clear from the portions released by the committee Democrats." That's putting it mildly. The supposed bombshell consists of three exchanges from 2011, 2015, and 2019. In a 2011 email between Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein referred to Trump as "the dog that hasn't barked," noting that an alleged victim had spent hours at Trump's house but Trump's name had "never once been mentioned." Maxwell responded, "I have been thinking about that." That's it. No accusation. No evidence. No incriminating information whatsoever. The victim referenced in those emails is Virginia Giuffre, whose name was redacted in the Democrat release. And there is probably a good reason they did. Giuffre, who previously worked at Mar-a-Lago, has consistently stated under oath that she never witnessed Trump engage in any wrongdoing. She testified that Trump never acted inappropriately with her, that she never saw Trump and Epstein together, and that she never saw Trump at any of Epstein's homes. Her memoir makes abundantly clear that Trump had zero involvement in Epstein's illegal activities. The 2015 emails show Epstein corresponding with anti-Trump author Michael Wolff, who was fishing for gossip during Trump's first presidential campaign back in 2016. Wolff, not Epstein, suggested ways to "hang" Trump politically depending on how he answered media questions about Epstein. Wolff is literally trying to urge Epstein to blackmail Trump in the email over the issue of whether Trump flew on Epstein's plane or had been to his home. "If he says he hasn't been on the plane or to the house, then that gives you a valuable PR and political currency," Wolff wrote. "You can hang him in a way that potentially generates a positive benefit for you, or, if it really looks like he could win, you could save him, generating a debt." Then there's a January 2019 email between the two in which they discussed whether Trump had banned Epstein from Mar-a-Lago years earlier. More at the link: https://pjmedia.com/matt-margolis/2025/11/12/the-democrats-latest-trump-epstein-smear-actually-vindicates-trump-n4945915 Are we to take the statement that Guthrie was the victim from R's as gospel? At a minimum, these emails show that trump had knowledge of abuse and possibly trafficking of underage girls by Epstein. That doesn't bother you? The biggest question to you and all the trump sycophants: Why not release all the files and let them exonerate him? Why work so hard to stop their release? 1
Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 3 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: Are we to take the statement that Guthrie was the victim from R's as gospel? At a minimum, these emails show that trump had knowledge of abuse and possibly trafficking of underage girls by Epstein. That doesn't bother you? The biggest question to you and all the trump sycophants: Why not release all the files and let them exonerate him? Why work so hard to stop their release? She's dead, right? So they pick a victim that can't tell her story. So MAGA 1
JDHillFan Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 11 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: Are we to take the statement that Guthrie was the victim from R's as gospel? Are you taking what Epstein has to say as gospel?
Orlando Buffalo Posted 48 minutes ago Posted 48 minutes ago 1 hour ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: Are we to take the statement that Guthrie was the victim from R's as gospel? At a minimum, these emails show that trump had knowledge of abuse and possibly trafficking of underage girls by Epstein. That doesn't bother you? The biggest question to you and all the trump sycophants: Why not release all the files and let them exonerate him? Why work so hard to stop their release? This email proves nothing related to Trump knowing about the abuse the girls recieved and these comments show how dumb you are. I wish Trump would release everything but you have to believe that the Dems protected Trump during the entire Biden regime to believe there is any smoking gun to implicate Trump. 1
JDHillFan Posted 4 minutes ago Posted 4 minutes ago 4 hours ago, The Frankish Reich said: Yep, so far they've avoided the slut shaming of the 14-16 year olds, but when it starts getting a little too close to their hero no holds are barred. I know how the use of “VICTIM” in a tweet got you spun up over something that isn’t actually happening, but maybe it’s your guys that are to blame. Note the ALL CAPS redaction. but the scare quotes
Recommended Posts