Jump to content

New owner should move the Bills to AFC North


Recommended Posts

I hear what ur saying but I like the Bills right where they are which will be even sweeter when they overtake the Pats as div king in the near future

 

Rivalries are never dead especially in 4 team divisions they are just not as good and all it takes is one game, one player or even one play to heat things up again

Edited by Max997
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you really want to shake things up...

 

South Division: Tampa, Jacksonville, Tennessee, Atlanta, Carolina, New Orleans, Dallas, Houston

East Division: New York Jets, New York Giants, New England, Philadelphia, Baltimore, Washington, Pittsburgh, Miami

West Division: Seattle, San Francisco, Oakland, San Diego, Arizona, Denver, Kansas City, St. Louis

North Division: Minnesota, Green Bay, Chicago, Detroit, Indianapolis, Buffalo, Cleveland, Cincinnati

 

Each team has one "partner" within their division, which they play home and home every year. You play your other six divisional opponents once each (three road, three home). That gives you eight of your games. Partners are:

South: Tampa/Jacksonville, Atlanta/Carolina, Dallas/Houston, New Orleans/Tennessee

East: Miami/Jets, Philadelphia/Giants, Baltimore/Washington, Pittsburgh/New England

North: Green Bay/Chicago, Minnesota/Detroit, Buffalo/Cleveland, Cincinnati/Indianapolis

West: San Francisco/Seattle, Oakland/San Diego, Kansas City/St. Louis, Denver/Arizona

 

No more conferences. Every year, each division will be paired with another one, and they rotate each year. So in year one, for example, the North and the West can be on one side, and the East and the South can be on the other. Your schedule is filled out by playing four games (two home, two away) against teams from the division that's paired with yours. Then you play two games (one home, one away) against teams from the other two divisions.

 

So the Bills schedule would look something like this:

Cleveland (home and away)

Home games in the division vs Indianapolis, Minnesota and Green Bay.

Away games in the division vs. Chicago, Detroit and Cincinnati

Home games against the division your partnered with: St. Louis, Seattle

Away games against the division your partnered with: San Francisco, Kansas City

Home games against teams from the other divisions: Tampa, Dallas

Away games against teams from the other divisions: Houston, Jacksonville

 

The winners of the North and West divisions would make the playoffs, with the team with the best record getting a bye in the first round of the playoffs. Teams that finish second and third in each division would also make the playoffs, plus there would be one wildcard winner who would play the division champion that didn't receive the bye. The second place finisher from one division would play the third place finisher from the other, setting up a playoff format on each side of the bracket like this:

Top division winner gets a bye and plays the lowest remaining seed after week 1 of the playoffs.

#2 division winner vs wildcard

2 North vs. 3 West

3 North vs. 2 West

 

Same thing happens on the other side of the bracket (East and South divisions) so 14 teams make the playoffs. Unless you earn the bye, you have to win three games to make it to the Super Bowl. Finally, you lose the Roman numerals and you just call it Super Bowl 50...instead of Super Bowl L.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Buffalo and Miami had split wins and losses somewhat evenly throughout the decade of the 70s, there probably never would have been much of a rivalry between the two teams to begin with. The rivalry was based on Buffalo losing 20 straight games from '70 to '79 to go 0-for the entire decade of the '70s. Geez, if that's what it takes to form a rivalry, then to hell with it. True geographic rivalries would be much better and would eventually become much stronger. I always liked the idea of Buffalo in a division with Pittsburgh and Cleveland - hope it happens one day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is based on fear. No way the tables are turning even when Brady retires. Sorry folks

And this is based on what exactly?

 

The Pat's drafting ability over the last 10 years? :lol:

 

No. When Brady leaves, unless there are serious changes, many weaknesses, that have been accounted for by Brady, will be exposed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...