daquixers Posted December 20, 2004 Share Posted December 20, 2004 No way Philly goes to the SB without TO --- NO WAY ... So who goes? Minnesota, Atlanta, Greenbay ... ??? I say Atlanta. Minnesota is overrated and Greenbay just lost AT HOME in December to a warm weather team that we pretty much handled in 80 degree weather. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
udonkey Posted December 20, 2004 Share Posted December 20, 2004 Can't be Atlanta - Michael Vick is destined to never cut his hair Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OnTheRocks Posted December 20, 2004 Share Posted December 20, 2004 i think if Seattle can get in....they have as good a chance as any. i know i know i know....they have played terribly...but they certainly have the talent to win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daquixers Posted December 20, 2004 Author Share Posted December 20, 2004 i think if Seattle can get in....they have as good a chance as any.i know i know i know....they have played terribly...but they certainly have the talent to win. 169732[/snapback] ANYTHING can happen in the NFC - every team sucks SO bad, that there really isnt any "better" team other than Philly WITH T.O. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Astrobot Posted December 20, 2004 Share Posted December 20, 2004 Minnesota has the highest yards per play in the NFC, and, of the teams that will be going to the playoffs, has the highest time of possession. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gantrules Posted December 20, 2004 Share Posted December 20, 2004 Even without TO they are still in better shape right now than they were last year. Last year they lost Westbrook late in the season. This year they have him. They could still pull it off. It's a shame b/c I wanted to see if TO could get it done in the playoffs. This definately lowers the intrigue factor in the NFC without him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daquixers Posted December 20, 2004 Author Share Posted December 20, 2004 Minnesota has the highest yards per play in the NFC, and, of the teams that will be going to the playoffs, has the highest time of possession. 169739[/snapback] Yeah but there sucking lately and are barely beating teams like Detroit, while losing to teams like Seattle, Chicago, Giants ... etc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Typical TBD Guy Posted December 20, 2004 Share Posted December 20, 2004 I still say the Eagles make the Super Bowl. The NFC pool of talent really IS that shallow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg de'Ville Posted December 20, 2004 Share Posted December 20, 2004 ...practically makes the AFC title game (especially if it's Pit/NE) the "de facto" SB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gantrules Posted December 20, 2004 Share Posted December 20, 2004 Please, the wild card round in the AFC will have better teams than the NFC Championship game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFaninNC Posted December 20, 2004 Share Posted December 20, 2004 CAROLINA! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsSouth Posted December 20, 2004 Share Posted December 20, 2004 Without TO, the NFL should forfeit the NFC´s Super Bowl representative, and have two AFC teams playing in the big game. Because the AFC Conf Finals will be just that, the title game, since nobody in the NFC now has a chance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thurman's Helmet Posted December 20, 2004 Share Posted December 20, 2004 CAROLINA! 169769[/snapback] Seriously, I would NOT count out the Carolina Panthers. Why not? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daquixers Posted December 20, 2004 Author Share Posted December 20, 2004 Please, the wild card round in the AFC will have better teams than the NFC Championship game. 169767[/snapback] Agreed. The AFC will have teams that DONT make the playoffs that would be the living sh-- out of the NFC Superbowl representative team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFan Trapped in Pats Land Posted December 20, 2004 Share Posted December 20, 2004 Seriously, I would NOT count out the Carolina Panthers. Why not? 169773[/snapback] No one in the NFC has played better lately. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Like A Mofo Posted December 20, 2004 Share Posted December 20, 2004 Eagles are out of it?!!?!? All I have to say to that is: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daquixers Posted December 20, 2004 Author Share Posted December 20, 2004 Without TO, the NFL should forfeit the NFC´s Super Bowl representative, and have two AFC teams playing in the big game. Because the AFC Conf Finals will be just that, the title game, since nobody in the NFC now has a chance. 169770[/snapback] As soon as I heard T.O. was hurt I immediatly thought that exact thing. The SB this year is gonna suck. It's gonna be a blowout. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFaninNC Posted December 20, 2004 Share Posted December 20, 2004 yeah - if they beat Tampa Bay this weekend and New Orleans they finish 8-8. Not bad for a MASH unit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daquixers Posted December 20, 2004 Author Share Posted December 20, 2004 Eagles are out of it?!!?!?All I have to say to that is: 169779[/snapback] Dude. The Iggles arent much without T.O. After Owens left the game, they struggled mightily to beat Dallas on a last second Donovan McNabb RUSHING TD ... They have the 22nd ranked rushing offense in the NFL. Without T.O. they are screwed. They are last years team without their 2 best DB's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted December 20, 2004 Share Posted December 20, 2004 wow, daquizlet really has a fascination with dissing pennsylvania teams Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts