Jump to content

Keukasmallies

Community Member
  • Posts

    3,250
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Keukasmallies

  1. On 6/9/2020 at 1:17 AM, transplantbillsfan said:

    Biden is a physically affectionate guy. And it's with men AND women. That's the crux of why I mostly dismiss it. 

     

    I think you and your ilk are trying to build up an argument of logic against Biden instead of considering just what/who he is.

     

     

    Joe Biden is a politician in the worst sense of the word:  Corrupt, self-aggrandizing, arrogant and totally clueless to the events around him.  On the other hand, and in his defense, he the victim of early onset dementia, he is being manipulated by the DNC and his family, and he is living through a time when anyone appears better than Trump, so the spotlight is on  Biden as savior while knowing full well he is as inept as his opponent.

    • Like (+1) 3
    • Awesome! (+1) 1
  2. 14 hours ago, Buffalo_Gal said:


    No one knows that answer. It has been asked here hundreds of times. My guess is still so they can scream "Political Persecution!!" for whatever past crimes are investigated/indicted. It slipped into elder abuse long ago.

     

     

    Agree with all'a that!  How will the DNC deal with the coming implosion of the leading "candidate"?  November is on the way, kids.

  3. 5 hours ago, Buffalo_Gal said:


    Yes, it appears he does. And, even though he is a horrible, corrupt human being, I feel badly for him and his family, and what is to come for them as his mental health declines further.

     

     

    I'm not so sure I feel badly for his family.  His wife is an intelligent woman; why is she letting this charade continue?  Does the DNC not see and hear Biden's inability to function over time?

    • Like (+1) 1
  4. On 4/2/2020 at 2:58 PM, LewPort71 said:

    Today is the "Heinz" day towards retirement.  57 more to go.

    Those are calendar days. 

    My replacement has been hired and training begins Monday.

    Fortunately, this was a person who left the company.  They found

    out the grass isn't always greener on the other side and

    is coming back.  I had begun the training with this person and was crushed when

    they left.  Now they are back , training wont be difficult.

     

    Mrs. Lew wishes it was 5.7 days as the knotheads she works with

    are becoming more knotheadier each day.

     

     

    Congratulations on being a work place short timer.   I'm at the far end from your "location" as I've been retired for twenty-three years; my goal is to be retired for as long as I worked in my main career, thirty-four years.  May you reach the same point in time!

    • Awesome! (+1) 1
  5. covid-19 and the horrendous murder of George Floyd certainly have added a few logs to the PPP fires.  I sense the newcomers seek to ride the conversational momentum into November; also sense some of the "newcomers" are old wolves in sheeps ferrets clothing.

     

  6. 2 hours ago, Buffalo_Gal said:


     

     


    I disagree.

    Whether or not people want to admit it, Trump has worked hard to bring the rule of law back to this country. Simply skipping the steps and absolving the Mayors and Governors of their duty, is not the way to proceed. Will it come to that? Maybe. There are 23 states (and DC) that now have the National Guard called up. If more need to do so, they should. The feds are last in line.

    Does it suck for the cities and states with the do-nothing politicians? Hell yeah.



     

     

    Calling in the Army and crushing the riots doesn't have to mean snipers on the rooftops, shoot on sight.  A graduated response could start with simply the presence of a significant number of troops and military vehicles in a show-the-flag formation, gauge the rioters response to that, act accordingly, rinse and repeat.

    • Like (+1) 1
  7. 5 minutes ago, Joe in Winslow said:

     

    Let's have a look at Trump's options:

     

    Option A - Call in the Army and crush the riots. Response from progressives: RACIST INSENSITIVE FASCIST! HATES BLACK PEOPLE!

     

    Option B - Do nothing. Response from conservatives: WHERE'S OUR LAW AND ORDER?

     

    If you were him, what would you do?

     

     

    Option A.  Resolve the problem; deal with the fallout later.

  8. 15 hours ago, BillStime said:


    Why? Trump is the one who partied with Epstein AND was involved w rape cases; not once but twice by a woman who claimed Trump raped her when she was 13.

     

    When Does America Reckon with the Gravity of Donald Trump’s Alleged Rapes?

     

    Lawsuit accusing Donald Trump of raping 13-year-old girl gets December hearing

     

     

    My post/request was aimed at the crude approach and language you barely skirted in your post; not allegations against Trump. You could have substituted  almost any name for Trump's [as your liberal sources often do] and my concerns would be the same.  Think it if you must, but exercise some decency in what you say.

  9. 37 minutes ago, BillStime said:


    Nah but Trump is known to play w 13 year olds and well; he would F his daughter if he could.

     

     

    TBD administrator: If ever a post should be removed and the author given warning points....

    • Like (+1) 1
  10. We can dance around any number of suggestions/recommendations after the fact; isn't the real issue extremist groups that, in a sense, lay in wait for an issue then pounce on it?  Are there any forward thinking officials in our various governments with a macro view of our society beyond just the deep partisan divides that characterize every important issue?  

     

    Is there anything, other than one's reelection, that is important enough to garner a bipartisan approach to its resolution?

     

    Not yet....

    • Like (+1) 2
  11. On 5/20/2020 at 12:18 PM, billsfan1959 said:

    Because I don't like what I'm feeling, the whole world needs to know how I am feeling,  and somebody needs to pay for making me feel this way....

     

     

    But what if the someone is a Democrat....  The media won't report it, the big city populations won't accept if they happen to hear about it, and the House of Rep's will committee/investigate it ad infinitum.

    • Like (+1) 1
    • Thank you (+1) 1
  12. 1 hour ago, billsfan1959 said:

     

    Agree 100%. I try to be intellectually consistent in my views. For me, impeachment is a last resort and should never be used to remove a sitting President merely for political reasons. I did not like Bill Clinton, as a person, for many of the same reasons I didn't like Trump, and so many other powerful men, including Biden: because he used his power to prey on women. However, I am able to separate my personal dislike from issues of job performance and I never supported the Republican zeal to impeach Clinton because I felt it was politically motivated. 

     

    Is there truly ANY attack against the serving administration's policies, appointments, or statements of position that isn't politically (and personally) motivated?  Is there one single issue that isn't met with a Schiff-like barrage of innuendo, animus, and/or personal disparagement?  Is there an elected official on the national stage able to argue against an issue without injecting personal diatribes?  I think not.

     

     

    • Thank you (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...