-
Posts
9,597 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by MDH
-
-
4 minutes ago, Alphadawg7 said:
This guy could be a monster next to Oliver. He is an eventual DaQuan replacement. This is a good pick
Just read a couple of write ups on him, both says he plays 3T (or 5T) which makes sense given his size.- 1
-
Reaching a spot here soon where one of the 5th round picks would be enough to move up from 95.
-
Just now, MasterStrategist said:
Steelers never thought Q Mitchell would be there....
This is between him and Barton I'm told
Please take Mitchell. I want no part of a lack of effort talent.
-
3 minutes ago, Roundybout said:
I’m actually happy Latu is gone. I have a feeling he doesn’t last long in the league
Yeah, on tape, he’s my favorite DL prospect in this draft. His medicals leave me wanting nothing to do with him. From what I’ve read his fusion survey gives a player - on average - 3-4 years playing time before it fails. Maybe he’s the exception, I wouldn’t take the chance though, let another team make that gamble.- 1
-
1 minute ago, Simon said:
Those Ends aren't getting through another 15 picks
Pretty soon it won’t take next year’s1st to move up…
- 1
-
Just now, Virgil said:
This is crazy that we still don't have a defensive player selected. Says a lot about the state of the NFL and hopefully Beane is paying attention
To take a defensive player? The teams at the top of the draft are the worst teams in the league… -
5 minutes ago, Simon said:
This place is going to go bananas when we trade up for Chop
I wouldn’t be surprised if they trade up for Turner or Verse. Everyone would assume it’s for a WR then be pissed when it wasn’t. 😂- 1
- 1
-
9 hours ago, Dr. Who said:
Yes, you know, I've heard this argument a number of times over the last few months. Turner and Verse will be gone for sure. Latu if he falls because of injury concerns, and Robinson. I'm not sure who else you would consider. I just don't like Robinson. I wouldn't take him at 28. If I didn't like a WR there (well, I'm pretty sure I would), but if I didn't I would rather try and trade back. Latu is the only fella I think you should consider if you are okay with the medicals. I think someone will take him before 28.
And then, I think they need a big X and a Z, so I want two WRs early if I can find value there. So the depth at WR to me means maybe I can get two early.
I’ve pretty much come to the conclusion that I’d prefer, in order:
1) Trade back, grab a WR
2) Trade up to 8-10, grab a WR
3) Pick a non WR at 28 if the value dictates it.
4) Draft a WR at 28.
This is all generally speaking, of course, it depends on how the board falls.
Only WR that can reasonably be gotten at 28 who I’d take there is BTJ. I don’t think he’s falling that far.I like Robinson there if he’s available. And while I love Latu’s game I just can’t get behind selecting him earlier than, say, the 3-4th. Everything I’ve read says that his fusion surgery has an average shelf life of 3-4 playing years. He's a ticking time bomb and has already used up most of those years. Maybe someone gets lucky but let another team take that gamble.
- 1
-
46 minutes ago, Dr. Who said:
It's literally the worst position group in the draft, so let's go there. You actually might get a difference maker WR at 28, though.
Which is why if one of the top 4 or so guys at edge are there in the 1st the Bills should seriously consider taking one as one of the plethora of WRs will still be around in round 2. Taking advantage of the depth of the WR class means you don't HAVE to take one in the 1st.
-
The Athletic did a similar exercise a week or so ago. They didn’t share the metrics they used but the Bills came in as the 4th best team in the league based on roster construction. I think that’s a tad high and it’s somewhere in between 4 and 10.
-
Other. It obviously depends on how the board looks but, in general, given how bunched up the WR are after the “Big 3” I’d like to see the Bills trade back somewhere in the 35-40 range, picking up a 3rd in the process then draft a WR there. Then, use one of the 4th round picks to move up in the 2nd and grab a WR again.
The Bills could conceivably end up with something like McConkey and Lagette.
- 1
-
With how deep this class is I don’t want them spending the assets necessary to move that far up but I’d be all for double dipping at the WR position in rounds 1 and 2.
- 1
- 1
-
10 minutes ago, Simon said:
Welcome home, Hal.
I was afraid you'd been gobbled up by Europa.
Yeah, I mostly browse these days. Not sure what inspired me to actually reply this time. I’m usually able to ignore bad takes. -
Did you see the D on Sunday? Swarming to the ball, fired up after every play. They were the definition of “high energy.” You’re confusing sloppiness - on offense, in the passing game- with low energy. Even in the run game they're shown that they can blow teams off the LoS, which doesn’t illustrate “low energy.”.
- 1
-
Manning wouldn’t tolerate “bad behavior” by Harrison? Harrison, unlike Diggs, had several serious bahvavioral issues and I never heard Manning say a word about any of it.
https://bleacherreport.com/articles/114971-marvin-harrison-the-nfls-quiet-bad-boy-wide-receiver
QuoteThe story reported that in 2003, before an AFC wild-card game, Harrison grabbed a New York Jets ball boy by the throat after a ball the kid was fielding violated Harrison's "personal space" as he played catch with Manning. Later, at a medical station, the boy's neck showed marks from Harrison's choke job.
QuoteAnd that's not all. The story reported that in 2005, three nights before the Pro Bowl, Harrison again grabbed the neck of an innocent teenager. This time, the kid had shown the audacity to keep pestering Harrison for an autograph. So what was the Pro Bowler's response?
He took a swing at the kid, "then grabbed him by the throat and put an arm around his neck." After some more physical play—hey, maybe Marvin thought he was on the football field, right?—Harrison and his friends ran off.So don’t lecture us about Manning “holding Harrison accountable.” 🙄
- 1
-
-
34 minutes ago, Success said:
He's spot on. ALL of the coverage I've seen is "well, about Lamar...." No credit for the Bills.
They all keep saying, "Baltimore missed kicks, Lamar missed one throw, Lamar got hurt, so and so dropped a ball, Baltimore out gained the Bills" and yet I have yet to hear anybody come back and saying "Buffalo missed 2 kicks too, Gabe Davis dropped a TD pass, the wind favored a running team, many of those yards were when the Bills were up 14 points and went into a shell defense?"
"Experts" keep talking about the yardage differential in both playoff games without ever mentioning the Bills had 14 point leads toward the beginning of the 4th quarter in both games.
It's just bazaar how they structure their narratives to make it sound like the Bills got lucky and they do it EVERY...SINGLE...WEEK. Their definition of "lucky" and mind are very, very different.
- 4
-
3 hours ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:
Tears? I had plenty of fears. Now I'm drinking beers!
Top shelf single malt whisky was pulled out tonight.- 1
-
8 minutes ago, Nextmanup said:
My assumption is Mahomes will put up 30 against us and it will be on us to match. We might do that but we have struggled to get the offense really flowing these first 2 playoff games.
I'd rather play Cleveland. The home field thing could present a benefit too, just in terms of the team feeling comfortable and being in familiar surroundings, being able to sleep in their own beds night before game, etc.There is no competitive advantage for home teams over the last 2 years in the NFL, despite people talking about the "home field advantage."
You may have convinced me, I do think they have a good shot at beating KC though. -
Am I crazy to think the Bills match up better vs the Chiefs than the Browns?
Cover 2 bend don’t break tends frustrate Mahommes and he gets impatien because he wants the big play.
Browns use great ground game to have a decent pass game, Bills D is good at shutting down one thing but when teams can both pass and run they struggle.
I think the O puts up points on both teams.
-
15 hours ago, Putin said:
You know what amazes me is that all the talk is around Lamar Jackson and how electric of a runner he is , and not much talk AT ALL about Josh Allen who shuttered ALL Bills passing records and TD’s ,
I thought I heard somewhere something about this being a passing league AND Baltimore is 32nd in the league in passing,
We've heard all week how the "Bills can't run the ball" and are "one dimensional" yet the Bills' rushing attack is better than the Ravens passing attack but nary a word is spoken about how one dimensional the Ravens are on offense. The Ravens are the most one dimensional team in the NFL.
-
24 minutes ago, Cheektowaga Chad said:
Moss - when the colts come out with 6 defensive backs we are gonna need to be able to run the ball
Why? Line up in 10 personnel and throw the ball all over the place. You don’t let them dictate what we do. -
I think its helped all offenses. There is a reason scoring is way up this year.
- 3
-
3 hours ago, loveorhatembillsfan4life said:
Pitt has a real chance of losing the next two after tonight. . I think as as long as we have a chance to play for 2 seed we do.
As long as they can avoid the 4 seed they should do it. Last thing they want is KC in the division round.- 1
Tim Graham article on Kim Pegula and Bills ownership
in The Stadium Wall
Posted
Yep, back in the day the news was free…
Wait, what??!!! F’n paywalls!!!