Jump to content

bdutton

Community Member
  • Posts

    1,259
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by bdutton

  1. 7.62 NATO at 200 yards with a decent optic wouldn't be a difficult shot for an experienced marksman. Recall there have been background nuggets that Mike had military experience.

     

    I am a trained marksman. In a prone position at 100 yards using a match rifle and matching match ammo with a .22LR would be a challenge to hit a shoe but definitely doable.

     

    Double that distance using a stock rifle and stock ammo you are nuts. Even with match grade ammo and rifle to hit an object that small taking into account wind and elevation changes is very difficult.

     

    Also, I thought his shooting the rifle into the air and not seeing any recoil was just awful to watch. Just the concussion of the round going off would kick up dust around him.

  2. I agree that it's no silver bullet, but many of 'the costs' we bear today are either inflated​ or depressed by factors other than their cost of production and I'm assuming would be considered artificial by your definition.

     

    The cost of everything going up in time is an inevitability. Raising the hourly minimum is simply a brute force way of ensuring wages increase somewhat concurrently.

     

    That is absolutely not true. The price of gas was once $4 per gallon. Now its just above $2. Its all about supply and demand and the cost of producing the product.

  3. It's true about some business and their margins. I'm a small business owner myself, and we pay about 10-15% above prevailing wage on average. It's not quite the killer you're making it out to be, in fact I think our worker retention and overall production speaks to the benefits of raising wages.

     

    Remember that not ALL business hire at the minimum pay scale. It wouldn't increase the cost of living across the board, only in certain areas.

     

    It artificially increases the costs. The costs of everything in turn will go up over time. It doesn't work.

  4. A higher minimum wage doesn't automatically mean everything else rises in price accordingly as to make the wage increase redundant. In the short term, it's a good growth stimulator as people are taking home more in paychecks and their spending power is increased. Some business will increase their prices to adjust for the added labor expense, but not nearly enough to nullify the wage increase completely as has been posited here.

     

    Businesses often operate an a razor thin margin in order to stay competitive. What you will get is layoffs, fewer hours for remaining employees and increased prices. And im some cases businesses will just leave or close for good.

     

    Federal minimum wage is a small business killer.

  5. Lets say you increase wages for the lowest earning employees from $10 to $15.

     

    Lets look at a Mcdonalds restaurant:

     

    Now, the team leaders who were making $14 per hour are making less... to even that out they need to increase them to $18 per hour. Now the shift supervisor earning $16 per hour are making less... they need to increase their wages to $20 per hour. Then the Assistant manager making $18 per hour are underpaid... they need to be increased to $22 per hour. The Manager who was making $20 per hour needs to be increased to $24.

     

    So if there are 12 employes earning minimum, 4 team leaders, 3 supervisors, and one assistant and 1 manager before the rate increase the 40 hour workweek payroll was 10,480. After the increase the payroll is now 15,920.

     

    McDonalds will have to cut expenses or increase prices.

     

    The same theory is applied to every single business model. As prices are inevitably increased so are living expenses like food, utilities and rent.

     

    Increasing the minimum wage without thought to the true cost and skill required to perform a job is idiotic.

  6. If Tom Brady were drafted in 1984, in a different era, where QB's weren't coddled, there is no way in hell that Brady would be in the shape, 16-17 years into his career that he is today. His body would have broken down at least some and he wouldn't be the player he is right now.

     

    Joe Montana was 4-0 in Super Bowls and won 4 in 9 years. If he wasn't injured in the 1990 NFC Championship game against the 49ers, he probably would have been 5-0 with 5 in 10 years.

     

    I know people were in a hurry to anoint Brady after the last Super Bowl, but if you take a step back and really look at the thing, there are QB's who have been just as impressive if not more with respect to their era. What would Dan Marino's career have looked like if he was drafted into the NFL in the year 2000?

     

    Tom Brady is definitely one of the greatest QB's of all-time and the best of his era, but as far as I am concerned what Montana did in the era he played in was more impressive.

     

    Looking back at the drafting of quarterbacks before and after 2000 where Brady was taken... how many are still starters the league:

    1999:
    NAME	POS	SCHOOL	ROUND	PK(OVR)	TEAM
     Tim Couch	QB	Kentucky	1	1(1)	Cleveland
     Donovan McNabb	QB	Syracuse	1	2(2)	Philadelphia
     Akili Smith	QB	Oregon	1	3(3)	Cincinnati
     Daunte Culpepper	QB	UCF	1	11(11)	Minnesota
     Cade McNown	QB	UCLA	1	12(12)	Chicago
     Shaun King	QB	Tulane	2	19(50)	Tampa Bay
     Brock Huard	QB	Washington	3	16(77)	Seattle
     Joe Germaine	QB	Ohio State	4	6(101)	Los Angeles
     Aaron Brooks	QB	Virginia	4	36(131)	Green Bay
     Kevin Daft	QB	UC Davis	5	18(151)	Tennessee
    
    2000:
    NAME	POS	SCHOOL	ROUND	PK(OVR)	TEAM
     Chad Pennington	QB	Marshall	1	18(18)	NY Jets
     Giovanni Carmazzi	QB	Hofstra	3	3(65)	San Francisco
     Chris Redman	QB	Louisville	3	13(75)	Baltimore
     Tee Martin	QB	Tennessee	5	34(163)	Pittsburgh
     Marc Bulger	QB	West Virginia	6	2(168)	New Orleans
     Spergon Wynn	QB	Texas State University	6	17(183)	Cleveland
     Tom Brady	QB	Michigan	6	33(199)	New England
    
    2001:
    NAME	POS	SCHOOL	ROUND	PK(OVR)	TEAM
     Michael Vick	QB	Virginia Tech	1	1(1)	Atlanta
     Drew Brees	QB	Purdue	2	1(32)	Los Angeles
     Quincy Carter	QB	Georgia	2	22(53)	Dallas
     Marques Tuiasosopo	QB	Washington	2	28(59)	Oakland
     Chris Weinke	QB	Florida State	4	11(106)	Carolina
     Sage Rosenfels	QB	Iowa State	4	14(109)	Washington
     Jesse Palmer	QB	Florida	4	30(125)	NY Giants
     Mike McMahon	QB	Rutgers	5	18(149)	Detroit
     A.J. Feeley	QB	Oregon	5	24(155)	Philadelphia
     Josh Booty	QB	LSU	6	9(172)	Seattle
    

    Other than Brees there are none.

     

    So to say that his longevity is because of the rules about quarterbacks is false.

×
×
  • Create New...