Jump to content

Patience

Community Member
  • Posts

    552
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Patience

  1. 6 minutes ago, 1ManRaid said:

     

    BAW GAWD YOU BROKE HIM IN TWO THAT MAN HAS A FAMILY *****

     

    *edit*

    Lol I can say pissy but not "darn it"?

     

    I am 6'5" and a shade under 300 pounds, and my mailman is significantly shorter and lighter, so this scenario is actually pretty realistic!

    • Like (+1) 1
  2. The version of the Bills that showed up last night will show up again next week against the Chiefs.  The Steelers had no business being in tonight's game, and KC's performance has no impact on what I think about them in their matchup next week against the Bills - I think of seeing a soft Chiefs team the last game against Denver.  The Bills will win next week, and they're going to go to the Super Bowl.  

    • Like (+1) 3
    • Agree 3
  3. 2 hours ago, klos63 said:

    That's ridiculous to think that Jerry Jones or any other owner would be ok with what you're suggesting. The league just signed a 10 year $110 billion tv deal, I'm sure they don't need to rig the next super bowl since that money is coming in for the next 10 years.  It's crazy conspiracy talk, that's all. Do the refs suck? Yeah, they do, are they getting paid off? Possibly. By the league?  No way.

     

    Sure, it's ridiculous and a conspiracy to think that rich men would prefer to become even richer.  Agree to disagree.  Have a nice Holiday.  

  4. 8 hours ago, klos63 said:

    You thinking that the other 31 owners would prefer other teams in the Super Bowl says more about you than it does me. Typical Buffalo, 'the world is against us' whining.

    Just like the Pro Bowl, why doesn't everyone know how great all the players on the 2nd place , 7-6 football team are and if all the players I like aren't voted on, it's a conspiracy.

    Do you really think the NFL tells the refs to favor certain teams and that all the other owners are in on it? Because the owners are the NFL.

     

    To some extent, yes, I do.  The owners are in the entertainment business.  That is the service the NFL provides to its customers.  Entertainment.  It's good for the NFL, and the owners collectively, both financially and for the health of the league, to have as many eyeballs as possible watching.  The way to do that is to provide attractive storylines, something ESPN and other networks help promote.  TV contracts are far and away the primary source of revenue for the league; it stands to reason the NFL and the owners collectively would want to assure that the networks' investment is protected when it comes time to renew.  A pattern of worsening ratings gives the league a lesser advantage when it comes time to negotiate, which hurts the league and owners where it counts.  If you want to call that whining, so be it.  It's business. Your blinders just preclude you from grasping it.  

     

    Personally, why do I keep watching?  Well, it's entertaining.  But I don't really view it as something tangibly different than a movie, a television show, or any other type of entertainment.  It's a good bit of fun for a few hours - granted, maybe not so much during the dark depths of the drought years.  And it gives me a good reason to spend time with my family every weekend during the season - that's the only justification I need.  

     

     

    • Eyeroll 1
  5. 10 minutes ago, klos63 said:

    yep, all the owners that make up the NFL will do whatever they can to assure a Patriots victory. That makes a lot of sense.

     

    If you really think the NFL doesn't play a role in giving overtly preferential treatment to certain teams, particularly after the way the Tampa game unfolded, then you're incredibly oblivious.  Your post leads me to believe that you are.  

    • Agree 2
  6. 5 minutes ago, Ed_Formerly_of_Roch said:

     

    Does any of this mean it's done or does this just mean it's a line item in an unapproved budget that now needs approval from the state legislature which I thought I'd read isn't even going to meet to discuss until early next year.  I certainly think they will approve it eventually bu not before much grand standing and ripping of payouts to billionaires by some.  Fortunately most of the people screaming about this are from the same party as the governor so that will help make it easier.

     

    You can infer whatever you think from what I posted.  All that I know at this point is in my prior post.  If I hear more, I will update.  

    • Like (+1) 1
  7. 1 hour ago, Doc said:

     

    You think or know?

     

    I've posted about this in a couple other stadium threads.  I typically hate when folks do the "I know a guy who knows a guy" posts, and my source is an iteration of that, so I feel a tad hypocritical making one myself. 

     

    With that said, I am good friends with someone whose family is a long-time NYS political dynasty, both statewide and locally.  He's pretty cryptic, but he's been giving me updates.  Apparently, there's been an agreement in principle (essentially a framework) in place for weeks.  I don't know any of this myself, and he has no reason to lie.  This is purely what he's told me.  

    • Like (+1) 1
    • Thank you (+1) 4
  8. 3 hours ago, klos63 said:

    Saying we need good lineman refutes the notion that you think we could get away with bad lineman.  It just doesn't work that way.  

     

    No,  I don't think it creates hesitation on the dline. I honesty think you're trying to fool yourself into thinking that this isn't that big of an issue. 

     

    Where did I say it wasn't a big issue?  Where did I say we could "get away with bad linemen?" Reread my posts and then get back to me.  

     

    I'm not fooling myself into anything - I'm aware that the team needs to work within the confines of the players we have available.  I know it's a big issue.  You seem to be the one fooling yourself into thinking we can find and/or develop "good linemen" by Sunday.  Of course it'd be ideal to have good linemen to run a screen play - that doesn't take much analysis at all.  But the point is - we do not.  And we need a gameplan with the linemen that are on the roster.  Unless you want to pull "good linemen" from who knows where to execute a different gameplan?  

×
×
  • Create New...