Andy1
-
Posts
1,776 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Andy1
-
-
Blame for the loss should really be more on the offense tonight. They failed big tonight in all aspects.
-
1
-
-
Time to hire an offensive coach to pair with Josh for the rest of his career. If McDermotts specialty is defense and your defense is poo, it’s time to go.
-
3
-
2
-
1
-
-
There are no words to describe how dumb that was
-
1
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, mjt328 said:
Christian Benford
Taron Johnson
Terrell Bernard
Greg Rousseau
Matt Milano
Taylor Rapp
Not sure why, but all of these vets have regressed BADLY this year.
Bernard has been playing with a bad ankle. The rest have no excuses.
-
Has there been a single penalty against Houston? Doesn’t seem like it.
-
4 hours ago, wnyguy said:
I can't understand why the victims of the abuse just don't come forward and name names? They could bring all those who participated to light.
Because there is likely a huge difference in wealth between the victims and the guilty. The wealthy can use lawsuits to silence the victims since they don’t want to go bankrupt with legal fees. They may also not want their names publicized. The young girls may likely also not have known who the men were.
-
Among politicians, there seems to be those who were with Epstein for the sex and those who were there for the cash. They may or may not be the same. I’m not trying to excuse any Dems. Any who assaulted those girls should pay the price.
-
1
-
1
-
-
7 minutes ago, Pete said:
Shavers averaged 6 yards separation against TB- the most in the NFL that week!
And that might be the last time that teams ignore him. Will be interesting to see what he can do vs Houston tonight.
-
Coleman will need to learn from Shavers how to earn playing time. He needs a lesson in humility and learn discipline. He also needs to learn how to play WR. People can mature and change. He has great teammates around him. He might just grow up and become a better player but he better start showing it in practice.
-
3
-
-
Great interview of Shavers. So easy to root for. Him and Josh have the same prove them wrong mentality. He also talks about his friendship with Keon.
-
1
-
1
-
-
I don't get all the rush to dump Keon. The young guy has talent, he’s on the team and he’s immature. He was given a starting role and didn’t appreciate it. Now with the emergence of Gabe and Shavers, he is going to have to earn it. He has the rest of this season to show the coaches and team what and who he is. I hope he figures it out.
-
2
-
-
What changed is that the MAGA base wants the files released after their candidates campaigned on it for years. The Dems saw vulnerability in Trump obstructing the release and pushed for the vote. Every day the news is about Trump and Epstein is a good day for the Dems. That’s politics. It’s been over 20 years since a lot of the crimes occurred. A lot of the names in those files are probably retired or dead, or out of the public eye by now so their power has waned and the politicians voting now may not care about them much. No one wants to be accused of standing on the side of the pedos.
Whatever is released, no one will be happy. No one believes anything anymore except that there is unity of opinion that the files should be opened to the public. People believe what they want to and absorb through their preferred media. Unless explicit details about Trump are in there, Dems will think Trump had his name removed from the files. Trump team has been through it all so they know what will be released, or not. MAGA will ignore whatever Trump stuff there is and focus on the Dem names in there. People who were just associates, but not guilty of any crimes will also be in there and their names will be out. It will be a mess. Reporters will have a field day sifting through it all and books will be written. I doubt anything implicating Trump will be released, but we may see who some real wealthy scumbags are.
-
1
-
-
Infrastructure all over America is aging out or not adapted to current conditions. It’s a giant problem which this bridge is just a tiny part of. It’s another problem which we largely ignore and kick the can down the road, figuring it’s a problem for our kids to deal with.
-
The Republicans don’t care about health care for Americans. If they did, they would offer a better alternative. Their plan is get your own insurance at market price. If you can’t afford it, it’s your problem and it sucks to be you.
-
1
-
1
-
-
Bernard has been playing on a bad ankle, which could explain some, but not all, of his issues.
-
Refs bail out Mahomes again when he throws a pick 6! BS.
-
Thank you Bishop!!!
-
That was big by Bishop. Third game in a row with Int.
-
Bernard looked slow on that run by Baker.
-
1
-
-
Looks like Shavers is starting outside going forwards.
-
1
-
-
5 hours ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:
I took the part that you put in quotes, but edited my post my post to add in the full sentences you posted. I am not sure that matters, but I certainly don't want to project the way I feel you and Tibs have.
I now understand that you think I was equating Biden pardoning certain people with the horrific nature of Epstein's crimes. I have no idea how you arrived at that, whether you thought I was writing in secret code, or if I just typed the wrong words and you noodled it all out. That's for you to figure out---I didn't mention Epstein.
I did not assume the people Biden pardoned are involved with Epstein in any way, shape or form. I would have said that if I did. I didn't. I hope that is clear to you now. Though, now that you (not me) have brought it up, it would not surprise me if any of those people pardoned--his brother, dopey son, Faucci---were involved with Epstein, who seems to cater to wealthy and famous people. Other notable wealthy and famous people I am not assuming are involved, but would not surprise to hear that they were:
You know what, I started typing names and it's easier to just say the following:
-Any A+ list actor or celebrity;
-Any upper echelon politician from any party;
-Any member of the UN;
-Any powerful manager of money
-lots more people
It’s easy to misinterpret people on this forum. You originally mentioned the horse being out of the barn with Biden in response to my comment about Trump with Epstein. That seems to me that you are mixing two different issues together and calling them one. You may see it differently. So be it. That’s what makes this forum interesting is interacting with others who view life differently than us. That’s America in a nutshell.
I do agree with you that there were likely a lot of wealthy, powerful men involved. Men who are socially inept and lacking women in their lives, or who liked the power part over a minor who went to Epstein. They were likely from both parties and and all sorts of businesses and finance. The financial backers of both parties are probably in the files. I still remember 6th grade in Catholic school when the nun told us “you can fool some of the people all the time, and all the people some of the time, but never all the people all the time”. And she was talking about a kid chewing gum in class, but it still applies in life. It’s time these dirtbag men with tiny peckers are exposed for their actions.
-
1
-
-
13 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:
Ah, you only wanted to grandstand on the one issue, not realistically assess how things actually work.
Biden granted a full and unconditional pardon to those receiving his most favored status, presumably for any/all federal crimes that might have been committed. That seems sufficiently broad to me to include exactly the types of crime you addressed, but I'm only trying to be realistic about how those things work. As for the depth and depravity of Epstein's crimes, we agree on that issue. However, let's not pretend pardoning/granting clemency to people convicted of murder is a walk in the park.
I see you attend classes with Tipsy at the New School of Stupidity Projected. You grandstanded on an issue, apparently don't like honestly discussing matters of "logic" when it goes against the World According To Andy. For me, Andy, here's what you just said:
“if he did assault some girls with Epstein, it’s not that big of a deal because look at what Clinton and the Biden’s have done”.
Please feel free to point out where I said anything even remotely close to that. I know each word you typed, the context in which you typed them, and certainly could have strung them together as you dod. When you cannot point out that connection, I'll assume you just had a little mental block because while you may be a bit of a virtue signaler and grandstander on some issues (and not others), you've never struck me as intentionally dishonest.
Lehn - you omitted the first part of my sentence. I said “It sounds like…”. Your comment was equating Bidens pardons with Epstein stuff. With what basis of knowledge is this valid? There are a slew of possible federal charges someone could face, for which a pardon would absolve them of, yet you are connecting those possibilities with this specific type of crime. Are you assuming those Biden pardoned are involved?
-
5 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:
Well, your guy and your crew just preemptively pardoned family members, associates, hangers on and syndicate members, Andy. All rich, all famous. Seems that horse has left the barn?
Or, maybe it’s just that logic and outrage are situational?
Yes, the rich and powerful have often used their positions in society for their illegal or unethical financial advantage. The context of my comment is about those people participating in the Epstein affairs and sexually assaulting minors which is as low as one can go in the depths of depravity. I’m not aware of Biden using his pardons on these types of cases.
As you seem to equate the two issues here it sounds like you’ve come to the position of “if he did assault some girls with Epstein, it’s not that big of a deal because look at what Clinton and the Biden’s have done”.
-
2
-
-
5 hours ago, muppy said:
why the pivot then though?
One possible explanation may be that he previously, honestly believed in the “if you’re rich and famous you can do what you want” philosophy which I’ve heard from someone before. A psycho person could believe that and think that nothing would ever stick to them, like Teflon Don. Projection onto their political opponents becomes the strategy. Then at some later time, some attorney knocked some sense into their brain and they realized that sexually assaulting young girls is considered socially unacceptable so the stop the release strategy is adopted. People with twisted brains do things the rest of us would consider illogical.
-
1
-
1
-
A Few Thoughts about the Texans Game - Community Edition
in The Stadium Wall
Posted
I’m not a fan of this defense, but they did give the offense plenty of chances in the 2nd half against a bad Houston offense. The offense could never control the line of scrimmage. Brady couldn’t scheme anything besides the big toss back play. Coaching scheme is such an important part but we always seem to lack in that department.