jms62

Right you were rooting Tyrod last season... Oh snowflake your game is so transparent. When you don't want to respond to a question , you respond with a question. Again and I really can't make this any clearer. What percentage do you put on Romo becoming a Bill next year ? As if you didn't understand that the last time. Let's see if you can respond without an insult or asking another question to avoid what is asked.

You are too funny and with zero self awareness to boot. Give me a percentage not the usual non committal answer. If he does come here though I will certainly be rooting for him to bring this team to the playoffs. Your body of work here is pretty clear me if we don't change QB's you won't be rooting for TT the same way eh Bills fan?

And you think that risk is ok for a guy who hasn't played but a handful of games in 2 years? You also think that a guy with his history of injuries and playing his whole career in good weather and desire to show the Cowboys they were wrong about him would come to a Cold weather team that hasn't made the playoffs in 16 years whose main problem is their defense? Again I ask what do you rate the chances he comes to Buffalo?

Let me ask you a question. You are on chat stating we pay a premium for players and are on this thread stating we won't pay a premium for Romo? Can you even align your own argument.. What makes Buffalo and it's weather so attractive to an aging injured QB? Again I ask since you know it all what number do you think gets him here and I'll go you one further do you think he comes here? If so what are you willing to risk for someone taking the other side?

I am not in a position to even guess nor have I ever stated I did . You seem to be the guy here with all the answers and probably have a number in mind so what is it? Let's hear it? Being on the chatbox you think we overpaid for a few contracts (And I agree) what do you think the Bills premium will be? So you are saying Bills will not be forced to overpay for Romo here but are on the chat stating they overpaid previously. What makes this different?

Houston makes the most sense for many reasons.

What makes you think he'd come to Buffalo given other options without Buffalo giving him the best contract? Is it the great weather the second half of the season ? Is it the chance to show everybody he still has it to win the Super Bowl and will come to a team that hasn't made the playoffs for 16 years vs a team like Arizona, Houston or Denver? You find it curious??? I find it curious and somewhat deluded that some can come to the conclusion that A. He reverts to 2014 form after all his injuries B. He comes to a team with the 4th best shot AT BEST of making a run next year without getting crazy Dollars

How do those numbers work if he comes to the Bills and renegotiates his contract? I think it is Pollyanna to think he comes here under existing terms.

Romo is a risk - sure, but if he is healthy he is an upgrade ​ You state this as if it isn't an ENORMUS RISK for the Bills to take on and also state it as if in all likelihood he will return to 2014 form. Kind of cavalier no considering the consequences?

Of course you aren't... But you lump everyone saying one thing positive about Taylor as a cult member. I am curious why you can do that and are outraged when others do the same back. Romo ? Seriously you are projecting that you get the 2014 version of Romo or the current broken down version? Quite a risk no? You talked about FLAWED QB's as if QB's without flaws were not the EXTREME exception. And again you are reading into my posts WHAT YOU WANT TO you appear far to smart to be doing that without it being purposeful.

Typical Tyrod haters response to turn every mention of Tyrod into a cult. You asked me how we should proceed at QB and I told you and you spin it this way when I am simply explaining the whys of the direction you asked me to give. think I explained myself well enough to show my stance is to go with Tyrod this season and then move on if it doesnt work out. I certainly explained why I think he will improve and why I think the offense will regress without him. Why do the haters always turn any rational discussion into anything positive said means we are cultish? IS it they can't argue on the basis of our points?

The list of QB's without a flaw is miniscule and thinking you are going to find him in a down QB draft year while risking a top 10 offense is simply not analyzing the situation rationally. This team is an improved defense, WR and a kicker away from the playoffs this coming year and we may already have most of the pieces in place on defense and a scheme change would do the trick. Unfortunately it doesnt seem to me that Whaley is in board with my thinking as blowing it up this year probably gets him 2 more years. Pegula's simply are to trusting of people that are manipulating the situation to keep getting a paycheck for as long as possible.

So you are advocating sitting Brady or the first 4 games? I love the idea even though it is preposterous.

Guys that bet against of an established trend wind up broke.

Darnold is impressive but I am not willing to risk the next 5-7 years given the track record of USC QB's. Easy to dismiss my point here because this post will be LONG forgotten before it plays out. I had this same argument with Jets fans when they went with Sanchez.This time ia always different until it isnt and youve wasted 5 years.

Why are you confused Gunner? It is not that difficult. 1. I will let a USC QB get into a Super Bowl and show me that their college success is more than the system and their being surrounded by an entire offense of players whom where All Americans while recuriteed. 2. I say we have a top ten scoring offense and anyone thinking Tyrods dual threat doesnt have any impact on that is either a fool or has an agenda. I say given a healthy and upgraded contingent of WR's there is a very strong chance his passing improves over last year. Kind of like the Miami game. If he doesnt improve than we are in position to draft a QB in 18 from a stronger crop.

I missed it. IS Darnold the only QB available next year? To take my TRUE statemet about the futility of USC QB's in the NFL and twist that into I dont want to draft a QB next year after I said I wanted to is beneath you.

Do you think the Bills with their obvious WR needs should draft a QB at 10 or wait until Next year when their is a better crop and from what Tyrod haters are saying we should have a much better draft position... That is my point.

Now I'll just keep moving the argument and making **** up and I'll be as good as you...

You have BALLS talking about reading comprehension McShay: I'll say this: It's not a great year to be drafting early and needing a quarterback. There's some depth (depending on how many underclassmen declare), but I don't see any elite prospects among those I've reviewed so far.

Well you landed on EJ last time around so there is that. LOL

Feel to disregard everything you don't agree with snowflake http://www.espn.com/nfl/draft2017/story/_/page/HotReadx161207/mel-kiper-todd-mcshay-25-questions-2017-nfl-draft-prospects-rankings-mock-draft

Google and take your pick I am not interested in doing your research for you.

He implied that I was attacking because I was a "vitriolic Tyrod fan". If there was a better option this year I am for it. I happen to agree with most pundits that say this just is not a good QB class and the next Good QB class is only a year away. Why be a buyer now when better product will be available next year?

Agree 100% it is pathetic that most well respected draft pundits don't agree with you either but you twist it into those that disagree with you are vitriolic Tyrod fans..