colin

you negative nelly's are miserable fans. i think the bills are much bigger, tougher, and readier this season. playoffs, and 5-1 in the division.

Flozell Adams: 25 Million, 5 years Walter Jones: 52.5 Million, 7 years Matt Light: 27.3 Million, 6 years Jason Peters: 15 Million, 5 years How about the pro bowl reserves at OT? Ogden: 50 Million, 7 years Samuels: 46 Million, 7 years Thomas: 42.5 Million, 5 years Clifton: 32.4 Million, 6 years jesus mikey, your chubby chasing manlove has blinded you to science!!! light and adams make the same or less than peters, clifton is barely ahead, and samuels isn't all that far ahead. of course, you have to include the LT snaps bonus, but you wouldn't misrepresent the facts just to show peters that your love for him is even greater than bill in nyc (trust me, you can't love a man as much as he loves peters!), would you?

just like how under rated players (westbrook for example) who are great get called underrated until the point where they are in the hall of fame being called under rated, linemen have had a reputation of being overlooked on this board to the point where people (akc, bill in ny, etc) lose their sheet and think they are the only players on the team. peters is a stud and LT is the most important O line position, but there is much more to a team and an O than one single position and frankly losing marchawn or evans would hurt our O more than losing peters. good to have him back, but the over hype given around here for OL is way overboard.

i'd rather have jp than not, but if he won't budge and we won't pay, i'd trade him for 2 firsts. so 1 he comes back, playes great, and we pay him after another probowl season 2 we pay him now, he comes in 3 he just sits 4 we trade his ass for big picks i'd go 1,2 then 4. a certain number of games in (especially if we play well) and 4 gets more and more likely

dave, i have to disagree about the bills not trading peters. i could see him getting dealt for 2 firsts (or even a first and conditional). atl, houston, maybe even cinci could trade for him.

if peters misses more than 2 or 3 games i think the likely hood of him being traded starts to approach and then exceed 50%. if our line and O is decent in the meantime, that likely hood really really goes up. if they put him up there for 2 firsts, it could happen. atlanta would like to protect their new qb i think.

it's a good problem to have. if we want to smash mouth and run the eff out of the ball, we need fresh legs all the time. that means we need to have lots of backs who can do lots of things. it will change week to week with health and so on.

if they think chambers can start at RT and bell is a future stud, i could see our FO trading peters for 2 firsts. a top tier tight end and a stud lineman taken in the first will improve our team if our line isn't that far off without peters. as important as the oline is, it is not like the dline where you need a total stud to be the focal point, you need a squad of guys all on the same page playing with toughness and smarts. i'd rather have peters than not, but he's not the only guy on earth who can do his job.

PUT MICKEY AND BILL IN NYC ON SUICIDE WATCH!!!

imo oline is about a unit playing well together, great talent helps, but it's not like on the dl where a whirlwind rusher can just set everything off. if we can play well w or w/o peters, that is the best thing for everyone

NO, WITHOUT THE LT THE BOARD GUSHES FOR WE CAN'T EVEN GET A 1ST DOWN!! clearly there is something wrong w the broadcast.

dude you ripped off thousands of times one's natural levels, that is stands to reason that it wreaks havoc, and enough other bullchit talking points to fill a nancy reagan speach. i'm not a world renowned expert, but i'm friggen dr zielger compared the inane junk that has been spouted off in this thread. anyhow, pure garbage.

you've never done any research on the subject have you?

haha, a little humor here, COME ON!

no one uses orals, they're liver toxic!! needles only bro, i'm safe!!

based on that quote, you are accusing me of being a steroid. at best, that's a half truth.

i still wonder how right his body is. we need to see him play some to know IMO. also, if he holds out and we think we can get our new young 7th rounder to project to be the next peters (not saying he will, but as good as peters is, he never sniffed all pro until he had dock beside him who has made walker look pretty good too, look how much jones out west has fallen off since losing his guard, it all counts guys) we would swap out peters for a couple firsts. as hard as an LT of high quality is to get, the line is about a compliment of talent and skills.

c'mon, admit it. you know nothing about steroids at all. you've never done any research yourself, some one you know (or the tv) speculated on steroids causing injuries so you just parrot that like a follower. steroids (as in AAS the kind that are tested for and players get dinged for in the NFL) DO NOT cause ligament tears and muscle fiber breakdown, they do the opposite of that. if you had spent 3 minutes on wiki you would see that they are used for people with muscle and ligament wasting ailments, they actually reverse that. do you think pot causes reefer madness and that porno causes rape too?

wow. this is just total garbage. complete and utter opposite of the truth. if merriman's knee is done, it's his knee that ended him, not steroids.

lynch and our 2 starting guards. while other guys have played well for our given expectations, there is a reason we got dock in FA last year ahead of everyone else at G (to some posters whining) and we inked up our RG. they are supposed to be physical athletic studs, and i think they are. they can make up for fowlers lack of power, and for peters being a ph@cking wimp. they can both run and punch straight ahead, and can pass block very well IMO. lynch is just a friggen beast waiting to happen every play. he accelerates quickly and does not hesitate, and i think he is getting saltier in the pass blocking game. you put together the base of our line and a young back showing more complete skills, and you have a shot at some great things.

cereal and in 06 he gave up the losing play to the jests (although hair and nose dropped the ball) by not blocking a blitzer.

+1 peters before last year was a could be great, 2 years ago was a might start. i like him, but he's in overdraft in his karma bank account.

i'm w the homie ramius. pennington on miami = d up in the box. we have way way more beef up front now, we'll get some licks on him and force him to lob some passes which will get picked off badly. favre will make us nervous with some nifty plays, but then he will make 3 times as many horrible bone head moves and put the ball up for grabs. the jests can barely run anyhow, so we'll be in pass pickoff mode the whole time. and don't forget, our McCorners are serious breakaway return threats. we'll be scoring on D at a good clip, particularly within the afc east.

i honestly think he has a chance of being the next peters. how funny would it be if he comes on while peters is sitting and bitching and we just low ball peters but have a solid line?

lol, 4 realz. there is (was) this guy on other boards called wys wings. he was insane. he picked and chose what parts of reality to use, and what parts to edit. he tried to write to impress you, but just made you want to rub glass in your eyes. he was much better than kat, who might be him but more insane.