Jump to content

colin

Community Member
  • Posts

    6,119
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by colin

  1. i'd go KC over jokeland.

     

    kc is a bad team, so you won't lose much taking them.

     

    jokeland is a team in dissaray, their coach is on the way out. also, they are a good running and bad passing team. this fits in perfectly with KC who are terrible against the pass but decent against the run.

     

    the joke qb is a bust in the making, and he will be forced to throw to bad WRs on 3rd and long regularly. that is INTs resulting in FGs and TDs for KC's horrible O. oakland will give up in the 3rd quarter and let it rain.

  2. good points.

     

    i think texas produces awesome talents and great ball players, but they do seem to not get the kids ready for all the stuff that a pro faces.

     

    these are kids that face the big time in school, but do so with tons of support. austin is just a really good postive place. a lot of texans (not football players) leave and just pine to go back, they love their home state and are often not comfortable outside of it.

     

    i think it is a mix of the uni, the team, and the state culture. of course tough minded players are ready to kick ass anywhere (like the dock).

  3. to me jax was a team with

    big strong tough guys

    physical O and running game

    hard to shake QB

    Salty D

    monster D line

     

    they don't have the strong tough guys on O, and have half the monster d line gone (havey is nice tho).

    less physical on O cuz of the line

    qb is more shakey (see last week) due to lack of beef

     

    so we are facing a team that at the moment might be a little bit of a tough match up (cuz of their D) than seattle was.

     

    now granted we are on the road, but our O line just got an All pro better and monster walker is still on the pitch.

     

    so i don't think it will be as strong of a win by any means, but i think we should win this game. the Jags have a weak to terrible O line and really lack speed on O (fast RBs, but nothing on the edge). i also think our fast persuing D matches up very well with them.

     

    24 13 with some big special teams and D contributions (consider us driving from the 20 to the 45 on their side and punting them down near the endzone as basically being worth points given our special teams and D).

  4. two ways to measure:

     

    who played at the highest peak (for however long you think it is required) vs who had the best overall career.

     

    in terms of highest level i have to give it to tony boselli. he'd stand up and pancake guys on so many plays, and on stretch running plays his guy would go out of bounds on his side. he was just vicious.

     

    tough for me to say in terms of career. munoz i'd have to go with. didn't see it all tho.

  5. while he hasn't put it together yet, in the ncaa and his first year we saw that VY has sick sick tools that could make him a great nfl player.

     

    that said, he is just too much of a kitty to do it. collins, his backup, wimped out of his first two teams before making it to a superbowl w the giants, so maybe VY can man up.

×
×
  • Create New...