Jump to content

UB2SF

Community Member
  • Posts

    335
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by UB2SF

  1. 2007

    Rnd Name College Note

    1 Marshawn Lynch California

    2 Paul Posluszny Penn State

    3 Trent Edwards Stanford

    4 Dwayne Wright Fresno State

    6 John Wendling Wyoming

    7 Derek Schouman Boise State

    7 C.J. Ah You Oklahoma

     

     

    Nice Draft Marv, lots a keepers. I love Marv to death, but this just points to the fact that Ralph pinching pennies and medling continues to lead us down the path of the 1980's Bills.

     

    Props to the OP for such an insightful post. (Depressing as hell, but still very insightful.) Good job! Not bad for a UDFA. :P

  2. The proper scheming/play calling and players like CJ Spiller will help TE stay healthy in my opinion.

     

    Bingo. (Or... I guess for you, Dog... I should say B - I - N - G - 0 !)

     

    Unlike our past coaching regime, Chan will use play-action fakes to freeze the rush and buy Trent an extra second or two to make the throw or at least avoid the big hit. Spiller is probably Trent's best protection.

  3. The issue with Trent isn't ability or physical tools. He can make all the throws, he's intelligent enough to win in this league as he's proven. The problem has been the dude is made of glass.

     

    With the O-lines that Trent has played behind with the Bills and Stanford, that's like saying that Evel Knievel was made of glass because he broke a lot of bones riding motorcycles! Sure, he has been oft-injured, but he has been oft-CRUSHED by DTs, DEs, LBs, CBs, and safeties running at full speed like a bull through a bullfighter's cape. It's fair to say that he is frequently injured, but I don't think it's fair to say that he's been easily injured.

     

    But your underlying point still holds, Tgregg -- it's a matter of him staying on the field for a full season.

  4. Under the true definition of hatred, I would have to say the entire Dallas Cowboys offensive line in the 1970s, because of the way they would get into their three-point stance during the snap count -- hands on knees, then quickly stand up straight and bend over into the stance. This elicited feelings of :censored: hatred every time I saw it!

     

    Gotta give props to the OP for this great topic! :beer:

  5. I have a few questions upon further reflection. (Please keep in mind, per my earlier posts, that I was in the too-many-unanswered-questions/complainer camp, but came to realize that the actual problem was me: I had not invested enough time and neurons to index all the facts and conjecture, so the questions seemed unanswered when they were actually resolved or resolve-able through inference.)

     

    Anyway, here are a few things that still don't make sense to me:

     

    1) Why did the smoke monster need to change human forms? And was one of his forms Christian Shepherd? And/or anyone else other than MIB and Locke?

     

    2) What happened when Jughead was detonated? Why didn't the Lostaways die? Was there a time flash that took them away from the actual detonation? Or were they immune to it because they couldn't be killed by a non-candidate (Juliet)?

     

    3) Why/how was Sayid revived from death? And why did Dogen subsequently tell Sayid that he had the "wrong kind" of energy based upon the torture test?

     

    OK, that's it for now. I appreciate everyone's knowledge and wisdom, and have hereby sworn off claiming that there were too many unanswered questions!

  6. i keep hearing this from the complainers, and each time I ask them to list some of the unanswered questions, and EACH TIME they either cant/dont or the questions they do list have been answered. at least to an extent that allows you to draw your own conclusion.

     

    so, with that being said, lay some of the unanswered questions on us, and we'll work out some answers! :worthy:

     

    Fair enough, Doctor. I certainly does seem that everything I label "unanswered" is actually something that either 1) has actually been answered, or 2) could be answered by inference, or 3) would be put in the "just let it go" category by the Lost faithful.

     

    I guess that's what's frustrating for me: the show was so dense with intricacies that it often left me feeling dense as a viewer. The precious few neurons that my daily life could afford to devote to Lost were overwhelmed with the endless barrage of facts and conjecture. Any answers would quickly be obscured by new questions, as the relentless throughput invariably shorted the neural circuit of those precious few neurons. So I am fully willing to accept that my complaint about unanswered questions is really just a complaint about my own inability to find and/or retain the answers. In Lost terms, I would have wound up as a whisper on the island rather than being among the group at the church -- I'm apparently not worthy!

     

    Thanks for offering to answer my questions -- I genuinely appreciate it. But I'll pass. It would only prove the failure of my neurons, and at my age, there are plenty of other things which do that every day. I think I just have to "let it go."

  7. I've been wanting to post something all day, but I was kind of scared off by the enthusiasm that has pervaded most of the posts today. But hey, we're a community and differing views are accepted, right? Even if it's "my fault" if I wasn't satisfied? :blush:

     

    Anyway, I was thoroughly frustrated by the finale and with the series in general. I loved the characters and the acting was superior to anything I've ever seen on TV, but I can't help but feel that the time I invested in the show has been badly wasted. As I've posted over the years, I grew weary of the impossible ratio of questions to answers, but I continued watching in the hope that the ratio would be reversed in the end. But we are ultimately left with way more questions than answers. I would like a cosmic refund of all the hours and neurons I spent crawling down plot-line worm-holes that ultimately served no purpose.

     

    Today I'm left with a profound feeling of symmetry between being a Lost viewer and being a Bills fan. "They're all dead" = yet another losing season.

     

    And the flaming will begin in 3... 2... 1... <I BETTER PUSH THE BUTTON!>

  8. I need help with a question my wife and I were pondering last night. A seemingly simple question. Like everything on Lost, the fact that we were unable to answer the question left us simultaneously frustrated and amazed/amused. Maybe our confusion was due to the intricacies overwhelming the big picture; maybe it was due to the "answers will be questioned" approach of the show; maybe it was due to the numerous micro-brew IPAs that were consumed prior to the viewing! :worthy:

     

    Anyway, what we're trying to figure out is why the episode was called "What they died for". Was that question ever answered? If so, what's the answer?

     

    (I feel dense asking such a basic question among the TBD community of Lost wonks.)

  9. From the late, great RJD himself:

     

    DIE YOUNG (from Heaven and Hell)

     

    Gather the wind

    Though the wind won't help you fly at all

    Your back's to the wall

    Then chain the sun

    And then it turns around and face you

    As you run, you run, you run!

     

    Behind a smile

    There's danger and a promise to be told

    You'll never get old

    Life's fantasy

    To be locked away and still to think you're free

    You're free

    You're free!

     

    So live for today

    Tomorrow never comes

    Die young, die young

    Can't you see the writing in the air?

    Die young, gonna die young

    Someone stopped the fair

     

    Gather the wind

    Though the wind won't help you fly at all

    Your back's to the wall

    Then chain the sun

    And then it turns around and face you

    As you run, you run, you run!

     

    So live for today

    Tomorrow never comes

    Die young

     

    * * * * *

     

    RIP, Ronnie. :thumbsup:

  10. That could very well be true. I wouldn't doubt it. And yes, that is the most important thing.

     

    I just think people are way too harsh on Marshawn. He's a kid. He's had mistakes and paid for them. But the dude flat out plays hard every snap. That's all you can ask from a player.

     

    Ah yes, this illustrates the other absence-of-correlation phenomenon: effort versus output. One of the reasons I bought Marshawn's jersey was that his running style seemed the embodiment of effort. But more often than not, behind our rag-tag offensive line, Marshawn's effort translates to two broken tackles, three jukes, and one spin for a gain of minus two yards.

     

    With Spiller, I see the raw gifted freakishness to explode beyond the inevitable scrum of tacklers rather than to be swallowed whole by it.

  11. Who cares. It's all about the player on the field. Not off.

     

    I'm sorry. Character is the most overrated thing in football. As long as they play hard on the field, who cares who's a better "person".

     

    Don't be sorry. I actually agree with you with regard to the absence of correlation between character and output. I guess that's exactly it: I sincerely believe that CJ will have better output than Marshawn, so the fact that his character is clearly superior to Marshawn's just makes me like this pick even more.

  12. I just watched the Chris Brown interview with CJ Spiller on bb.com. At first I thought, "well, this is just your basic boring run-of-the-mill draft pick interview"... until my mind flashed to the first interviews I saw with our last first-round RB, Marshawn Lynch. Then I realized I was seeing something more important than just football cliches from a nervous young adult.

     

    Let's compare:

     

    CJ -- appears humble and soft spoken

    Marshawn -- appears to be a character on the Chappelle Show

     

    CJ -- stayed in school to finish his degree; earned Dean's List

    Marshawn -- went to school miles from his hometown; left early for the cheddar; earned respeck from his homies

     

    CJ -- idolizes Warrick Dunn because he was as great off the field as he was on the field

    Marshawn -- idolizes... um... himself?

     

    CJ -- 3-time All-American in track and field

    Marshawn -- 3-time subject of felony charges

     

     

    Now that CJ is here, when will Marshawn go? Not soon enough.

     

     

    Disclaimers:

    - facts cited in the above comparisons might not, in fact, be facts

    - I am a Bay Area guy with a Marshawn jersey in my closet; it hurts me to say these things

  13. Answers will be questioned.

     

    PTR

     

    This quote is classic. My wife and I watched Tuesday's episode on the DVR last night, and as they cut to one of the commercial breaks after a typically WTF moment, I looked sternly at my wife and said your quote in my best network-voice-over voice. She laughed almost uncontrollably as I fast-forwarded through the commercial break.

     

    And yes, I gave you credit for the quote. :w00t:

  14. I had a similar situation recently. In my case, my computer was able to successfully connect only to secure sites (those with an https address instead of http address, such as my company's secure e-mail portal). After monkeying around with a bunch of stuff to no avail, I called a local house-call tech service for help. The guy determined that a virus had changed some of my settings. He restored them to the proper settings and voila, the problem was fixed.

     

    Not sure if this is your situation, and obviously I can't tell you how to fix it, but the cost of the on-site visit was worth every penny because it saved me the frustration of trying to fix it myself.

  15. Randy Rhoads in "Over the Mountain" by Ozzy Osbourne.

     

    While Rhoads had a number of spectacular solos before his untimely death, it was Over the Mountain that seemed to fully infuse the new wave of early-80s metal with classical-influenced modes and picking techniques. Rhoads claimed something to effect of having ripped off Vivaldi riffs in many of his solos, and Over the Mountain displays this perfectly. Give it a listen and picture a violin virtuoso shredding on a Stradivarius instead of a shaggy-haired guitarist with a Jackson V guitar. Amazing.

     

    :D

  16. New question: How is Ben Linus in the Sideways world? If he was already turned over to the Others after being shot, he could not have been on the Galaga. And if the Island was sent to the bottom of the Pacific when Jughead was detonated, wouldn't everyone still on the island have perished?

     

     

    We don't actually know that Jughead was detonated, do we? I personally think the apparent detonation was a red herring by the writers, and that it was a time-travel flash that occurred rather than a nuclear explosion.

  17. Not sure if this has been discussed somewhere else in this thread (or the other seasons' threads), but I'm curious about the parallels between MiB/Jacob and Widmore/Ben. Both pairs appear to be playing lifelong games with unwritten rules and sometimes dire consequences. Anyone have any insight on these parallels?

     

    Forgive me if this is obvious or already resolved... this show leaves me a bit... well... LOST. :(

  18. I think Edwards as gone, not because he wouldn't make an acceptable backup but because he's mentally spent in Buffalo. He's turned on the city, the fans have turned on him. It's time for him to go.

     

    I agree that Edwards is probably gone. Just curious what you've seen that indicates that he's turned on the city. Do you mean "turned on" or "turned on"?! :flirt::):doh:

     

    It's a serious question, though.

  19. I'd add Robert Royal for lack of agility. No ability to adjust his route or his body to make a difficult catch, and when he did make a catch, he'd usually just fall down with the ball rather than attempting yards after the catch.

     

    And how about Chris "he's not a punt returner but more of a punt catcher" Watson? :flirt:

×
×
  • Create New...