Wallymo

There are different standards of proof in a criminal versus civil proceeding. Beyond a reasonable doubt is a higher standard than more than likely. If assault can't be proven beyond a reasonable doubt, should criminal charges not be sought at all (and therefore not fail) and only a civil action brought? Particularly in a "he said / she said" matter? I'm not trying to be critical, I just don't follow the logic.

What are the Bengals doing? Shemar Stewart in the first, who has never produced. They then drafted two guards, two linebackers and a running back with their five remaining selections. Just terrible value everywhere.

I read that book when I was 12 and it scared the holy hell out of me.

I've never seen a supposed first round talent less wanted by fanbases around the league than Shemar Stewart. He's this year's Tony Mandorich -- all testing and no tape.