Joe Ferguson forever
-
Posts
10,544 -
Joined
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Joe Ferguson forever
-
-
6 minutes ago, JDHillFan said:
The constant edits are interesting. The rush to post incomplete thoughts is reflective of the overwrought mindset I guess.
deflect, deflect, deflect. but I'm sure Hemingway wrote "A farewell to Arms" in one draft. (he likely rewrote the opening sentence many times.)..simple minds do simple thing and vice versa.
So let's go back to the Cochrane review. You do know it's a review of existing studies and not an originall study, right? That's important in understanding that it found existing studies inconclusive...
And the mortality data for red vs blue states. You seem to be avoiding that like the plague (pun intended).
-
1
-
-
5 minutes ago, Chris farley said:
lol, she edited her comment after you made yours to include it.
they seem to have one coordinated goal but are not that good at it.
its desperate to pull out that discredited and anti-scientific article about people that didn't get the shot, that died.
I'm 100% XY but why do you hate women. Maybe because of your arrest? I linked the article containing the quote in my first draft. I then went into the article to cut and paste the salient quote from the editor in chief. but keep deflecting, cuz it says what I said. Intellectual dishonesty (and general dishonesty) is all that you MAGA's have to argue with. Oh, and pls link evidence that the mortality stats from red and blue areas was discredited. And not some catcrap crap...
-
1
-
1
-
-
12 minutes ago, Buffarukus said:
With the dems going full pro pedo. kids grouping up into a little militia defense wouldnt be a terrable idea. Its the only chance they have. They also have really small hands. Good for reaching in to unlock capital buildings windows and doors. making insurrections go alot more smoothly in the future.
Alot of good ideas hawk. Keep em coming. 😅
a lot of bad spelling ruck. go back and get your GED...
-
1
-
-
4 minutes ago, JDHillFan said:
It would be accurate to say that the review examined whether interventions to promote mask wearing help to slow the spread of respiratory viruses, and that the results were inconclusive. Given the limitations in the primary evidence, the review is not able to address the question of whether mask-wearing itself reduces people's risk of contracting or spreading respiratory viruses.
Are you ignoring this from Cochrane? You should start masking again. That way you and everyone in your circle will feel better emotionally and stay covid-free. Between superspreader events like football games, concerts, and packed airplanes along with citizens going about their normal lives, there’s just too much risk out there. Stay safe!
of course I'm not ignoring it. I posted it. What do you think the words mean? They mean that the studies available don't answer the question, in a large part because even in the "intervention" group only 40% non morons wore masks. 60% were/are morons.
And what about the mortality data from vaxed versus unvaxed counties and states. We probably couldn't have designed a more elegant study. Certainly not one this big. And it showed more people died in unvaxed areas consistently. I guess you believe that was coincidence?
-
1
-
-
25 minutes ago, Andy1 said:
Are you suggesting that the best medical people in the world are all in a mass vaccination conspiracy with Bill Gates to turn us into cyborgs so the government can track our movements?
They already know that no one in power cares about them except trump🤣 so why would Bill Gates?
-
1
-
-
17 minutes ago, JDHillFan said:
St Fauci, as of this weekend on CNN after being confronted with data, is down to “masks help on an individual level”. I’m not even sure what that means but you seem to disagree. Do you advocate widespread masking despite what the latest data shows?
The vaccine, as it became quickly apparent, does not prevent infection or transmission no matter how many times you get it. You want healthy people who are at extremely little risk to continue to get it in order to protect at-risk people despite it not being effective at prevention/transmission. That makes no sense.
Do you ever read anything about Covid other than right wing propaganda and disinformation? I linked an article earlier explaining that the authors of the review did not agree with th e conclusion that masks don't work. Here is Cochrane's official statement: https://www.cochrane.org/news/statement-physical-interventions-interrupt-or-reduce-spread-respiratory-viruses-review
from the editor in chief
"It would be accurate to say that the review examined whether interventions to promote mask wearing help to slow the spread of respiratory viruses, and that the results were inconclusive. Given the limitations in the primary evidence, the review is not able to address the question of whether mask-wearing itself reduces people's risk of contracting or spreading respiratory viruses.
The review authors are clear on the limitations in the abstract: 'The high risk of bias in the trials, variation in outcome measurement, and relatively low adherence with the interventions during the studies hampers drawing firm conclusions.' Adherence in this context refers to the number of people who actually wore the provided masks when encouraged to do so as part of the intervention. For example, in the most heavily-weighted trial of interventions to promote community mask wearing, 42.3% of people in the intervention arm wore masks compared to 13.3% of those in the control arm.So it was morons like you that made the study nearly useless...
Re the effectiveness of vaccines, we saw the largest in situ experiment on its effectiveness here in the US. Counties with low vax rates had higher death rates and vice versa.
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, Chris farley said:
The mandate mob is working hard to go back to that place where they were in control no matter how moronic the rules. were.
and the majority are saying eff that. those voices lost any integrity they claimed to have and are just howling at the moon at this point.
yes, significantly more morons in red states died from Covid because we were wrong...idiot. but you're right. why bother with you fools....
4 minutes ago, Orlando Tim said:10 hours ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:The masks do not improve safety for anyone, even CNN admits that now. As for the vaccine we now know for a fact that it will cause myocarditis in more children than would die from COVID, so if you have a healthy child the vaccine is more a threat than the illness
Link please. So the chair of infectious Disease of the American Academy of Pediatrics is advocating killing kids from myocarditis. He spent his entire adult life in medicine to kill kids. you are really stupid and it's scary that you are teaching kids.
-
1
-
-
47 minutes ago, Chris farley said:
So much Diversity.
So much Cringe
And come on, learn to play before using the guitar.
you could see two of the three in the entire group dying inside. lol
yes, it would be much better if they made a video of a militia training and then told kids how awful America has become with wokism, right?
-
1
-
-
3 hours ago, BillStime said:
I made out on Trumps PPP bonus!I actually benefited substantially from his tax breaks
-
1 hour ago, B-Man said:
If you are celebrating 10-20 yr prison sentences for the J6ers you have lost your humanity
They didnt kill anybody
Most weren't even violentYou worship the state like a God
You view their actions as apostasy
This is why you want their lives ruined
They desecrated your templeby supporting these traitors, you make yourself one. The American system of government should be a temple beyond desecration. It's only those that can't compete within its boundaries that want to radically change it. But please, keep telling us how important the constitution is to you. Your motives are transparent.
And it looks like your source is a grifter selling merch to the rubes....not particularly successful as he has 14k followers,..anti war with pistols all over his site. you idiots are nuts.
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, Andy1 said:
And whatever happened to young and healthy people caring for their elders or the weaker people in society. Isn’t that a conservative family value?
These are not conservatives. They're MAGA's and they only care about themselves and perhaps their immediate family and will scratch and claw and adopt false beliefs because that's who they are.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
-
4 minutes ago, reddogblitz said:
I'm sorry, I laughed out loud. The person that all day long calls other posters idiots, simps, Karen Psyop, LOSERs, etc gets offended when his/her opinion is challenged?
I believe in psychology they call this a bully victim complex.
I believe in a rational world, they call this truth...
-
1 hour ago, Orlando Tim said:
My son is almost 10x more likely to die in an auto crash then from COVID, and that is just flat numbers not including his lack of any comorbidities, but I can't stop him from living his live and the fact that you would recommend I shut down his life to "protect" him makes you not just ridiculous but immoral.
So you’ve given up with arguing the data …and it’s life which I’d expect a teacher to know…wearing a mask and getting vaccinated are not shutting down his life. But you do you. More power to you.
“If we looked at all those other leading causes of death – whether you’re talking about motor vehicle accidents or childhood cancer – and we said, ‘Gosh, if we had some simple, safe thing we could do to get rid of one of those, wouldn’t we just jump at it?” And we have that with Covid with vaccines,” said O’Leary, who is also a professor of pediatric infectious disease at the University of Colorado School of Medicine and Children’s Hospital Colorado.
O’Leary is chair of infectious diseases for American Academy of Pediatrics. Seems like common sense but that’s uncommon now
-
3 minutes ago, Orlando Tim said:
You believe CNN over actual CDC numbers. Less than 1700 of the 130000 deaths, or 1.5% is from COVID since 2020. Truly 500 kids a year in the entire country is a shame but your risk analysis tells me you are more interested in finding a way to argue that your decisions in 2021 were smart then in actually learning.
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid_weekly/index.htm#SexAndAge
CNN linked this page in the story: https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#demographics. Something you rarely see in far right reporting because, you know, it's the truth.
-
Some context about the Cochrane review might be useful. but probably not to you all.
“Buying time until vaccines (or an amazing treatment) could be developed was the purpose of the masks,” she said. “My take is that public health officials in 2020-21 didn’t have a lot of options: without an effective vaccine, yet they couldn’t make people stay at home forever. Masks were a reasonable thing to try.”
Cowling agreed that the main function of masks is to delay infection, and that people should have realistic expectations for them.
“Ultimately even a very careful person will be infected eventually, but masks could delay that or reduce the rate of infection from once per year to once every few years, perhaps,” he said. “Community masking is not aimed to prevent everyone from ever getting infected, the aim is to reduce transmission and ‘flatten the curve’, reducing peak healthcare demand, or to work in combination with other measures like social distancing to contain transmission in the short-term.”
On 9/2/2023 at 9:43 AM, Orlando Tim said:My kids have both gotten it multiple times and the worst symptom is a sore throat for one and sniffles for the other, they are not really threatened by it
nothing to worry about
https://www.cnn.com/2023/01/30/health/covid-deaths-children/index.html
-
2 hours ago, SoCal Deek said:
I hear Lisbon is really nice this time of year. Just saying. 😉
It would most likely be the Algarve. It's a good option but I really like Virginia.
https://www.tripadvisor.com/Tourism-g189111-Algarve-Vacations.html
-
21 minutes ago, JDHillFan said:
He calls it “winning”.
well it is. If I actually had been drinking , you all would look even worse....
-
2 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:
How much have had to drink today? You’re literally not making any sense at all. Thanks for distracting me for a bit. See ya.
buh, bye. until the next logical beat down.
-
1 minute ago, SoCal Deek said:
Classic modern liberal response. “What do I care if my political leaders are skimming off the top?” Good for them!
Not my argument. but you know that. I just explicitly told you and offered a poll....what's that fallacy called again?
-
4 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:
See? You have literally no idea how much you’re being used. And you think if you just avoid it and try and change the subject, then it can’t possibly be happening. I’m beginning to grow more and more fond of the term ‘useful idiots’. It truly fits!
If that were true, I'd be miserable. But I'm happy. You know how much I hate cheats. Good lawyers and accountants are worth the money.
-
1
-
-
2 minutes ago, Pokebball said:
Nearly successful? That's an interesting take?
Ah, you feel it was a success. sorta the equivalent of the beer hall revolt?
3 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:Once again I’m correct….TRUMP, TRUMP, TRUMP. You’re being played for a fool by those laughing all the way to the bank.
nope. I'm not exploited and never felt that way. That's a MAGA thing...
-
3 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:
Don’t look now but you’ve become a pathetic partisan fool. You wouldn’t know/admit evidence if it bit you in the arse. No disrespect intended….or maybe a little actually is.
Hell yes, I'm partisan. Against a party that has lost its soul and decency. And still bends a knee to the most crooked president in history who tried to overturn an election by a ridiculous but nearly successful schme. If they'd have just got to Pence....
-
1
-
-
5 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:
Give me a break. In the Biden corruption case you take that mountain of evidence and say ‘what evidence’? Shameful.
And all you have to do is look at the post, just above mine. Enough said.
Well, we all know what you'd do with a mountain of evidence against your boy. I think almost every Liberal here has stated what I just wrote. Or do you think we are as dishonest as thee cons here.? Maybe I should do a poll and find out? I'm thinking there would be a unanimous "yes" to "Should Joie Biden be prosecuted if an abundance of evidence against him is revealed? How would you vote. I'm a Yes.
-
1
-
-
4 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:
I find it fascinating that all of the resident leftists want to populate a thread about Biden’s obvious corruption with distractions about everything but Biden’s obvious corruption. I’ll ask again, when did all of this corruption become so acceptable? Is it just overlooked as a means to an end? And if so, what’s the proverbial end?
If it can be proven, arrest and convict. That's where liberals and cons differ. You all defend a POS with mountains of evidence against him. We say, bring on the evidence against Biden and if it's convincing, indict him. See the difference?
-
1
-
Education in America
in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Posted
Show us your battle plans. Are they in crayon?
Wow. you cut so deep. Your insults are as bad as your political rhetoric and reasoning.