Jump to content

BuffaloBobs

Community Member
  • Posts

    143
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by BuffaloBobs

  1. 29 minutes ago, SDS said:

    Are logged-in members seeing ads on the forum?

     

    Despite being logged in, I show ads to myself so I know what is being shown and where. 

     

    I am logged in and see the ads when navigating onto the forum from the main TBD page. Totally unobtrusive, one click and they're gone.

     

    Edit: Windows 10 with Chrome

  2. 8 minutes ago, Jobot said:

    Force feed ads that you have to click on is the latest greatest craze!

     

    Maybe if I'm positive about this forum my post won't get taken down? Either way, super great call leaders!

     

    This is a great and free website and community. The least I can do is click past an advertisement to help the owner keep the servers running.

     

    Why not offer to send him a few bucks a month for a premium ad free experience?

    • Like (+1) 17
    • Agree 6
    • Thank you (+1) 2
  3. 8 hours ago, NewEra said:

     

    going for 2 to cut the lead to 15 when we could’ve gone down 16 .......what was I missing?  How was that a good idea. I was flummoxed.  Still am.  
     

    hopefully he continues to evolve as a HC

     

    That made sense to me.

     

    Either way you're going to need the two point conversion, so it makes sense to go for it earlier. That way if you don't get it, you have more time to adjust rather than to wait and not get it later in the game.

     

     

  4. 23 minutes ago, dbfla10 said:

    Yet none of them have a 30mil qb and a 20mil WR, so no im not kidding you. 

     

    Wrong.

     

    Mahomes contract averages $45,000,000 a year while Hill averages $18,000,000 a year. So yes, the Chiefs meet and exceed your arbitrary threshold. The Saints and Packers both average above $45,000,000 a year between their quarterback and top receiver, the Buccaneers more than $40,000,000.

     

     It's possible -- in fact I'd argue if there are two positions where you should spend on top talent this all suggests it's quarterback and receiver.

  5. 1 hour ago, dbfla10 said:

    not trolling show me a team with a 30mil QB and a 20mil WR that consistently contends?

     

     

    Are you kidding -- how about the other three teams playing last weekend?

     

    Buccaneers, Packers, Chiefs all fit the bill of highly paid quarterback and at least one highly paid receiver. Two of them are playing in the Super Bowl. The Saints, a stones throw from making it have consistently contended paying Brees and Thomas.

  6. 26 minutes ago, dbfla10 said:

    There is no doubt Diggs is going to ask for more money. Deandre Hopkins yearly salary is going to be nearly twice that of diggs. Diggs is going to ask for more money, and based on other contracts he deserves it. I know he has 3 full seasons left, but so did hopkins before his trade. Going to be very tough to afford these two unless the bills ride out Allens contract till his 5th year, which I think is best. 

     

    As if we are the first team to have two top players on the roster that we want to retain. SMH

     

    If you're not just trolling -- I'd expect to see a lot fewer free agent signings of the type we saw last season. It's going to be rookies, resigning our own impact players, and rolling the dice on veteran minimum type players or players with injury or character concerns to fill out the roster rather than mid to high priced free agents.

  7. 17 minutes ago, NoHuddleKelly12 said:

    Stumbled across this article and after a cursory search didn't see it posted here yet, thought it was an interesting wrinkle on the concept of gaming out your upcoming opponent's strengths and weaknesses during the season--I'm not a big video game player but for those here who love playing Madden, what are your thoughts on the effectiveness this would have or not? Also, isn't the game only as good as its data inputs/programming? 

     

    https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2021/01/25/john-madden-thinks-nfl-teams-can-benefit-from-hiring-madden-players/

     

    I don't really get this from a game planning perspective. I do think it could maybe help with practicing game management -- when to go for it on fourth down, take the field goal, go for two and maybe for basic familiarity with players and their strengths and weaknesses but John sounds really out of touch talking about this. It's kind of sad really given the football mind he had.

  8. If I am the Colts, or 49ers then I would be going all in for Rodgers -- even at his age, he's worth at least two first round draft picks. I also think long and hard about it if I am the Saints or Steelers depending on the status of Brees or Roethlisberger respectively. I think he makes any of those teams instant Super Bowl contenders and rivals to the top teams in either conference.

     

    I also think the Dolphins, Bears, Broncos and even Washington might look to get into the mix too and wouldn't be crazy to send two ones to the Packers, just not as sure they become instant Super Bowl favorites solely with his addition.

  9. 4 hours ago, Hebert19 said:

    I get Coach's loyalty but how is it a good idea to play in AFC Championship with your 2,3,4 receivers hobbled?

     

    1.  Beasley likely will have meniscus surgery is my guess.   He was a warrior but clearly not as full strength.  

    2.  Brown was never healthy since like week 4.  Guessing he also has surgery on his agenda.  Knee ankle i don't know what. 

    3.   Gabe couldn't even play all game until the end and was clearly not at full strength. 

     

    We ended up running Knox out there as a WR basically all night because we were short and yet we had 2 practice squad guys that whether they know the offense or not could have stepped in.  We needed to score a bunch of points tonight.   We knew this would be the case...yet we went is knowingly short handed.  

     

    This was a fail!

     

    That's right. They shouldn't have played the game, stay home until everyone is healthy.

     

    But seriously -- Beasley was our most productive receiver, and Brown had a couple tough grabs. I don't think sitting either of them helps us whatsoever.

     

    If you're going to Monday Morning Quarterback, maybe we should have sat Davis but it obviously doesn't change the final outcome. I'm sure they decided that a dinged up Davis with his knowledge of the playbook, comfort with Josh, and physical play style brought more to the table than guys with some combination of less talent, physicality, and knowledge of the playbook who have likely no rapport with Josh.

  10. 5 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:


    completely unrelated... there is no connection with Lynn and I can’t imagine anyone artificially contriving one. 

     

    Can you imagine if we'd replaced Rex Ryan with another former Jets head coach?

     

    It should be unrelated and based totally on merit. But same way the folks on here complained any time a Carolina Panther was signed, regardless of whether they played with McDermott or not, I can absolutely see Chargers fans not wanting another Buffalo coordinator.

  11. I don't hate the move if I'm the Texans. By all accounts they lost the locker room this season. If I'm them I could see hiring a leader and experienced hand as head coach, especially if he could bring in coordinators that I was highly comfortable with.

     

    It's in vogue to hire a young offensive or defensive mind as your head coach but I'd rather get a leader there and some good coordinators than a specialist on one side of the ball.

  12. 26 minutes ago, Ramza86 said:

    We play base nickel...this should be easy. I dont get it.

     

    I think for about half of the year ive been screaming...please cover the freaking tight end.

     

    Yesterday I was boiling watching it unfold again.

     

    Anyone have any ideas?

     

    This season we've struggled with bigger receivers (Parker, Metcalfe), tight ends, and slot receivers (Crowder, Kupp).

     

    On the tight end front though we've played all the best this season: Gesicki, Waller, Kelcie, the Colts stable. I think the Milano injury, lack of pass rush from our front four probably are top contributors, and lack of size among our corners are probably top contributors.

     

     

  13. 3 hours ago, Jpsredemption said:

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.indystar.com/amp/6573537002.                The guy is a great football player, no doubt and is clearly better than Edmunds but hindsight is always 20/20. He could be a big factor in the game Saturday. He’s a playmaker. 

     

    That's pretty lame -- it's not as though we drafted a bust of a player in his place or he had any ties to Buffalo. The team liked Edmunds more and he ended up in a good situation in Indianapolis, be grateful.

  14. 2 minutes ago, Bangarang said:


    Seems unlikely they would go with something like that. 
     

    Is online poker/gambling part of that as well? Where did you hear this?

     

    It looks like online sportsbook only at the moment -- unclear whether it will be run through the lottery or open like Pennsylvania.

     

    https://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/new-york-elections-government/ny-cuomo-sports-betting-revenue-20210106-ukzlf4keorecvpkafplwyu767i-story.html

  15. 4 minutes ago, MiltonWaddams said:

    I think that they sat Beasley so that he could get super healthy for the postseason. I don’t know if you have ever seen super healthy, but it’s special. You want to be super healthy. #hottake

     

    I have wondered (especially because I don't think they've ever said specifically what his injury was) if his disappointment on the sideline was more knowing he would be shutdown for the game and the following week, rather than concern for the season. He was as close as he's ever been to a 1000 yard season which is a huge milestone for a receiver.

    • Like (+1) 2
×
×
  • Create New...