Tanoros
-
Posts
448 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Tanoros
-
-
12 minutes ago, BullBuchanan said:
Why do people have such a hard time understanding the difference between laws of the state and the practice of private industry when it comes to things like rights? He has no right to be treated as "innocent" by his employer (or us for that matter) until someone proves that he's guilty. His behavior has negatively impacted the franchise. That's reason enough for termination.
Why do people have such a hard time understanding the private industry in AMERICA should represent American ideals in order to attract hard working Americans. Who wants to work for a company/organization that doesn’t adhere to America ideals? Those pulling the weight of this country along are the ones who adhere and respect the American way of life.
Obviously a private company is free to do things that are counter to the American justice system, but such actions are not free of consequence. In the instance the Bills find themselves in, there isn’t one right answer as so many in this thread seem to indicate. EVERY organization/company worth a damn has procedure/protocols in place for dealing with the multitude of things that can occur. Just as the Bills do in this instance. The best thing the Bills can do is follow their pre established procedures/protocols (even if that means dumping the player, however, that doesn’t appear to be the case as of now).
-
1
-
-
8 minutes ago, Buffalo_Stampede said:
The Buffalo Bills aren’t the justice system. They have no obligation to wait. They’ll act based on what’s best for the organization.
Agreed, however innocent until proven guilty is an American value. Do you think the Bills are more or less attractive to players when we cut people the second a negative accusation is made against them? Of course not, the reason being, not adhering to a core tenet of the American way of life.
Just any team preaches the best man wins the job, so should the team follow their existing procedures for this kind of thing, and I guarantee you, the procedure is NOT to act based on feelings and public perception. The Bills have to show honesty and integrity in regards to their players, illustrating that they respect them as people.
Too many in this nation react emotionally and then don’t see anything wrong with that. Pure insanity
-
2 minutes ago, Logic said:
The issue I see is that it's very difficult to get to the real "truth of the matter" in these types of cases, and during the entire period of time that the team is in the process of attempting to do so, there is a giant distraction hanging over their heads, and a lot of damage being done to their reputation.
Suppose this ends the way these things so often do -- with a settlement out of court and an NDA being signed. No real answer of what happened or didn't happen, no real closure. Meanwhile, weeks of national discussion, distraction, outrage, and damage to the Bills' image of "family and culture" has been done. But now their punter is "free and clear" legally and they get to keep him. Was it worth it?Consider the counter to what you say. Who wants to sign with a team that dumps a player the second there are accusations made against that player? There are never easy choices in these situations. At the end of the day, the right answer is to follow plans put in place for these kind of things and NOT make off the cuff decisions based on emotion.
-
2
-
1
-
-
3 minutes ago, hondo in seattle said:
For a guy called "Logic," I find it odd that you've created a false binary choice. I don't want the Bills to "stand by Araiza" nor do I want them to ditch the guy because he's not worth the headache. Both options you present are noxious. I want the Bills to investigate the matter and then do the right thing.
It's flat out morally, ethically wrong to pull a Brian Banks on Araiza and crap on him because of a false accusation. But if the accusation turns out to be true, the right thing to do is cut him. At this point it doesn't seem the Bills - or police - know enough to make an informed decision based on the preponderance of evidence.
This right here. The Bills have to exercise their own due diligence and determine if he did it or not. They might not get a 100% definitive answer, however, they should be able to get enough information to make an informed decision one way or the other.
However, the Bills should NOT act on an accusation alone. Too many people in this country jump to conclusions based solely on headlines and quick sound bites. Fortunately, the Bills organizations seems to be beyond that.
Whatever the outcome, hopefully the truth prevails.
-
1
-
1
-
-
17 hours ago, Buffalo_Stampede said:
Immediately released.
In this country we are innocent until proven guilty. Anyone can make an accusation.
If guilty, he deserves punishment, but he deserves a chance to defend himself, as we all do.-
4
-
-
19 hours ago, ColoradoBills said:
It's getting to the point where it's pretty obvious he won't make the Rams game. He will be missed.
But the next 3 are against Tannehill, Tua and Lamar. Not the biggest outside and deep passing threats.
Bills getting Tre back after game 4 won't be too bad. At least it won't be against Mahomes and Rodgers.
Get him healthy if need be, it's a long season.
The thing is, if he goes to the PUP list, he can’t practice either. As good as he is, he is going to need some practice time being for going full go in a game. So he would miss a minimum of 4 games, but would the Bills have him play game 5 with only one week of practice?
If they don’t put him on the PUP, it’s one less person that can be stashed, however not everyone on the 53 is active every week. If Tre is close, it might be worth having him inactive for a week or 2, while still being able to practice and ramp up.
The best thing about this news is that he is close. If he wasn’t, he would be on the PUP already.
-
1
-
-
On 8/19/2022 at 4:47 PM, Ethan in Portland said:
I'm about as far from a Bills homer as it gets, but the roster being 6th - 10th is laughable. They have question marks but so does every team in the league. They are a top 3 roster with incredible depth at multiple positions. If White was healthy, I would list them #1. Right now my top 3 in no particular order is Tampa, Buffalo, and LA Chargers. All three have question marks. Will age finally catch up to Brady? Can the Chargers rebuilt defense come together quickly? And in Buffalo can the CBs step up until White and will Davis emerge as a true #2.
This should get the board riled up...
Now if you include coaching then I would agree a 5-7th overall ranking probably is correct. McD and Frazier cost us a SB last year and both are back with a massive question mark at OC.
I know Dorsey is a massive question mark, but I have such a good feeling about him as an o coordinator and I’m anticipating our offense looking better than it has to date (with Allen).
-
On 8/19/2022 at 8:27 AM, ScottLaw said:
12 for WR is right on the money IMO.
I agree. We all have faith in Davis and McKenzie (trust me, I do big time), but we can’t expect them to be rated near the top until they’ve proven themselves over a full season.
I expect after this season, the Bills wr room will be ranked much higher, and that’s the crutch with exercises like this, you can’t rank guys who haven’t produced ahead of guys who have, yet we all know guys who haven’t produced will break out during the season, but we can only guess who. In the end, you have to perform these exercises based off of proven performance (which is more looking back than forward).
-
1 hour ago, ToGoGo said:
It represents persistence, will, desire. All the timeless qualities of success. Good character and ethics go without saying.
Very foolish, ignorant, simple, and poorly read people would come to the conclusion that it is a license to cheat. Ironically, they were possibly projecting their own feelings of "needing to cheat" to get what they want.
Exactly. Look at the high character people associated with the Bills, they most definitely don’t see the mantra as something that would allow for cheating. Like you said, good character and ethics go without saying.
-
1
-
-
22 hours ago, DrDawkinstein said:
Von Miller #93
Doofus McCorkle #85
The list has officially jumped the shark.
This used to be OK for entertainment purposes. Especially since it is player-voting. See who the players think deserves it. But McCorkle making this list AT ALL, let alone ahead of Von Miller, is an absolute joke and completely discredits what little validity it ever had.
I was done with it when I saw McCorkle on the list. There is no way he is top 100 material, especially as a rookie. He was very solid for sure, but top 100 players are well beyond solid.
-
16 hours ago, MasterStrategist said:
Perhaps. Just going off last yr tho (only 3 game preseason to compare against), Josh only played some in final game.
I think getting him and other starters "live" action is def a delicate balance, but I like the idea of 1 quarter (game 2 or 3, not sure it matters much).
I think McDermott will wait until game 3 again. Because of the roster cut down dates, game 2 is the last chance to see many live before the big cut downs.
Before game 1 it was stated that McDermott wanted to give the guys fighting for a spot as many opportunities as possible.
-
1
-
-
4 minutes ago, FireChans said:
So they are similar but not comparable?
Let's play a game:
I compared two QB's to Lamar Jackson. Can you guess who is who?
Ok, so compare players based on stats alone? That’s the end of the line? How do they achieve those stats? Garbage time, against a backup, wide open play, there are so many variables as we all know.
For me personally, my comparison of the two is based on what I see with my eyes, them as a football players on the field. Lemar’s play on the field is far and away different than Tyrods. Tyrod was lien a Trent Edwards who could run. That’s who he compares to.
-
1 hour ago, FireChans said:
I posted 2021 already. Here ya go.
As far as the LJ topic is concerned, how could you argue they aren't similar. Unless you are arguing that similar means same, in which case I would point you to the good people at Merriam Webster.
I don’t see them as similar. Unless by similar you mean a black qb who can run.
Lemar is not only faster than Tyrod, he has a better arm and is more willing to throw deep. Lemar is so much more explosive as a player, and he looks to take open lanes and run.
Tyrod was more like a classic game manager, who took the easy, open shots. He could run, his running was more of a last resort or play extending, than taking open lanes immediately. Overall, I think Tyrod’s running is closer to Josh than Lamar.
Lamar is such a unique talent at qb. It’s really hard to compare him to any qb. I’m personally excited to see if he can take a step forward passing this upcoming season.
-
1
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, syhuang said:
Zero?
Like when Belichick knew Russell Bodine wouldn't make the team so he still insisted to trade a 6th round pick for him? 😎Exactly. A trade guarantees a team gets the player, instead of having to compete with other teams. A trade is never out of question with Beane, especially when we have good depth.
-
1
-
-
On 8/8/2022 at 10:09 AM, Watkins101 said:
The reason behind it was last year it was called about 1/3 of the averages of the past 2 decades. It is quite the annoying penalty, but it’s also quite annoying to see your receivers constantly interferes with.
I’d prefer it to be more like last year honestly. Grabs like we saw against Diggs at Tampa for sure should be called, but I can’t stand the ticky tacky stuff. Let them play a bit. The main reason it annoys me is because there doesn’t seem to be a ton of consistency game to game (not just talking about Bills games only BTW). The obvious stuff is what should be called, like a Jersey being pulled away from the wr.
Has anyone noticed that trend that some of the better wr’s have been getting good at “falling” after the db barely puts their hand on them? I believe Evans did this to us last year once or twice. I’m afraid we will see a ton of this s**t this season.
-
2 minutes ago, extrahammer said:
I wouldn't be surprised if the scuffle was staged.
It looked pretty natural in the video. These guys have enough going on, I doubt they are planning staged scuffles with a chance for a silly injury.
-
1
-
-
31 minutes ago, StHustle said:
yeah I don’t think Jordan did that to Kyler…I do think Josh’s size and physicality makes it more welcoming for Jordan to feel he can do a little extraHow could you know if he did or didn’t do that to Kyler? That’s pure speculation. You’d have to follow Cards camp to even have a chance at knowing.
The rest of your comment may hold some merit, either way it’s pretty much like nothing. It’s got to be hard to do their job when all of sudden the red no contact qb comes running at you.
-
9 hours ago, Awwufelloff said:
The Bills star players have been healthy for 3 straight years. We are due for a big time injury. Its literally inevitable.
We lost Tre for the season last year. He is definitely a star player.
-
2
-
1
-
-
10 hours ago, Gugny said:
I don't begrudge the players for getting what they can, when they can get it.
I just think it stinks that teams are forced to pay ridiculous amounts of money to their QBs, making it difficult to build around them. And even if they can manage to build around them, they will still be faced with tough decisions/incapable of having any kind of continuity across the board.
I actually kind of like this. It adds more disparity and variety. I also like to see how teams navigate which qb’s to pay.
I also things it’s cool to see the really good qbless teams pick up a good young guy and make runs (Seahawks).
What else does having a high paid qb require? Good drafting. Staying on the top with top qb contracts requires help from many levels and most especially the qb himself.
Hopefully Beane can keep it up on the drafting end, because we know Josh will (I believe in Beane btw).
-
On 7/21/2022 at 10:46 AM, Logic said:
Is it just me, or do Beane's contracts frequently look like amazing values about two years into them?
I know that part of it is just the nature of the market. The "highest paid at his position" at the time of signing quickly becomes the sixth highest paid as other players sign deals.
Still, the value I see in Beane's contracts seems to go beyond that.
Whatever he may lack in pure player evaluation, he sure seems to make up for in shrewd contract maneuvering. Credit also to former Bills fan punching bag turned afterthought Jim Overdorf, who Beane says plays a big part in the specifics of the deals.I think this is also a reflection of the, “culture” we hear so much about. The Bills get guys who want to win and understand if they truly want that, they have to be flexible with contracts, while still being paid their worth. It’s a fine balance for sure, as you said, Beane gets it don’t.
-
1
-
-
4 hours ago, Back2Buff said:
Highly doubt it. The kid has a huge learning curve to begin with coming from a very weak conference. He also fell to the 5th round for a reason. Can late round picks make it?! Absolutely, but it usually takes a very long time.
There is 0.1% chance that plays are even being made for him. If he makes the team, he won't even be dressed without injuries.
Did you watch the video? It honestly sounds like you didn’t. There is a couple VERY specific examples of how him and Cook together can change how the defense defends our offense, you know, things that defenses did last season, that we know have two counters for.
Also, Shakir opening things up for our offense doesn’t mean he is going to have a monster season, in fact, in the video Brett mentioned that a good year would be around 500 yards or so, but his value would be more so in relation to the rock/papers/scissors games that defenses and offenses play.
Look how our offense evolved during the season last year. With Shakir we have someone who excellent at alot of different things, which means, it’s very possible our offense evolves during this up coming season in ways that incorporate Shakir, while keeping defenses on their heels.
Lastly about late picks taking a long time to do anything, I’ll references Gabe’s rookie season. He contributed quite well, and right off the bat. If Shakir can provide something close to Gabe Davis year 1 production, while providing our offense with more versatility/counters, that’s good boost.
-
1
-
1
-
-
On 6/16/2022 at 8:57 AM, Big Turk said:
All I am saying is that if he's ever going to realize his potential it's going to be with Josh Allen. Allen turned Beasley into a first team All Pro
Additionally, Austin came into the league right before offenses really embraced the pre snap movement/shuffle pass throws (think how we use McKenzie) that have become so popular, and that style suits his skill set. If Austin was just entering the league again, I think he’d see more success and be utilized more effectively.
That doesn’t mean it will work out here though, but as you said, working with Josh Allen is about as good of a chance as he can get. Also, if you watch his interview, the guy has such a great mindset and perspective on football and his career. Great for the locker room.
-
1
-
1
-
-
On 6/15/2022 at 4:52 PM, Sheneneh Jenkins said:
Shakir isn't getting cut, I agree definitely. Depending what happens, he possibly could be put on PS though. I think McKenzie makes it for sure. I'd be really surprised if he doesn't.
Shakir would be snagged off of the practice squad. That’s not an option if we want to keep him.
-
2
-
1
-
-
19 hours ago, Back2Buff said:
Its a way to stash a rookie without them getting picked up by another team.
Stevenson last year. I think Hodgins was the year before that.
Shakir is going to play an important part of the rock/paper/scissors game on offense, even as a rookie.
Check out this analysis of Shakir. I didn’t realize he could do some work from the backfield. With him and Cook (plus the other weapons), our offense will be very hard to stop, because we will have counter moves all over, plus we have guys who can win 1v1 as it is.
-
2
-
1
-
Matt Araiza accused of rape, served with a lawsuit.
in Off the Wall
Posted
However, a situation like this needs to be handled the same regardless of player/position. It’s doesn’t help build chemistry/morale treating people differently based on the position they play.
Imagine Josh being accused of something like this. Should we expect the Bills to get rid of him immediately because of the bad look to the organization? I know many here who are so willing to move on from Araiza wouldn’t feel the same if it was Josh.
I know for a fact I wouldn’t want to work with a company/organization that handles hard times differently based on who you are/what you do. Fortunately, the Bills are not such an organization.