JDHillFan
-
Posts
3,579 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by JDHillFan
-
-
6 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:
Yes. Because you are either incredibly naive or self-hating if you openly support a party pledged to undo recognition of your family as legitimate.
So go ahead, plead with the OP to change the title of this thread to "Naive gay man proves naivete yet again."
Or it’s possible that you are an insecure creep. Maybe you have issues that cause you to comment on the skin condition of one person, the drug problems of another or the “self-hating”of someone else.
“I don’t like the way this person thinks. He’s a self hater”. That’s an interesting way to go about things.
-
10 minutes ago, Trump_is_Mentally_fit said:
I forget, are you the one that had the surgery? Transitioning, right?
Ah, leftist humor. I really can’t get enough of it. Thank you.
-
2 minutes ago, Trump_is_Mentally_fit said:
Nice call grammer Nazi! What a tool you are
🤣
Love idiots as low as you 🤣
Heat getting to you today? You seem like you might be coming a little more unwound then usual. Have a popsicle and hang in there.
-
1
-
1
-
-
9 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:
I've not been a fan of Greenwald for a long time. I think he is incredibly naive in his view of the world. Championing Edward Snowden. Supporting Trumpism given all that comes with it (and yes, that includes backtracking on LGBT rights).
And so now everyone sees that.
And from that you arrived at the description of “self-hating”. Seems ugly but whatever floats your boat.
-
10 minutes ago, Doc said:
On vacation this week. Visiting my son in North Carolina.
And never wanted to be necessary to you.
I think North Carolina is where Redhawk pretended to see a swastika painted on a barn roof. Please be on the lookout for Nazis down there. Best of luck.
-
1
-
1
-
-
They came across the border looking for jobs and to better themselves. Anyone that disagrees just hates brown people.
or some such bullsh*t
-
2
-
3
-
-
4 minutes ago, Big Blitz said:
LFG!!!!
Hahahahaha
LOVE this! The entertainment value will be off the charts. My sympathies to any marginally sane New Yorkers.
-
3 hours ago, The Frankish Reich said:
Funny how no one is singing Glenn Greenwald's praises now.
Hint: he seems to think Trump was no intellectual match for Bibi's hypnotic skills of persuasion.
Funny (not actually, more weird and disgusting) that you ever described him as self-hating because you disagreed with his politics. Is anyone doing that now? Seems like another own-goal for you.
-
Just now, TH3 said:
So Bolton sucks huh? I guess we should listen to the game show host who sexually assaults women, bangs porn stars because his wife is pregnant, carried on with Epstein and tried to overthrow an election along with a bunch of podcasters, weekend news hosts and a 23 year old landscaper who runs counterterrorism ….gotcha
Are you a John Bolton fan?
-
3 minutes ago, Roundybout said:
Yes. Here is a study from Headwaters Economics, a research firm in Montana.
https://headwaterseconomics.org/public-lands/wildfire-public-land-housing/
"Less than 2% of the 181 million acres of Forest Service operational and Department of Interior land included this analysis are close enough to towns with housing needs to be practical for development—around 2.4 million acres. Most of this land is concentrated in a handful of western states—primarily Nevada, Arizona, California, New Mexico, and Utah—and the vast majority of the land is managed by DOI. Forest Service lands offer even fewer options, with only three states (Arizona, Utah, and Oregon) having more than 5,000 acres near towns."
Developing housing on public lands may offer benefits in a limited number of communities, but it is not a broad solution. While access to low-cost land can help, housing affordability depends on a complex set of factors—such as construction and labor costs, financing availability and interest rates, insurance access and affordability, and proximity to jobs. In addition, hyperlocal constraints like water supply and community opposition can further restrict feasibility.Beyond this, I don't want our pristine and beautiful natural lands to be taken over for suburban sprawl. It's unsustainable development. Housing policy should be focused on upzoning existing municipal lands and reusing underdeveloped sites, instead of paving over new ones.
I can’t work up any outrage over .5-.75% of government owned land being opened up for development. The remaining 99.25-99.5% seems like a lot of wilderness left to appreciate. To quote Frankish, “nobody cares”.
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, B-Man said:
It was too depressing to write this last night, after we got off air, so I went to bed.
But, it needs to be said by more Democrats: this was not an impeachable offense,
and Trump did not need congressional approval for one precision attack under
the circumstances, just as Obama did not when striking Bin Laden.
Why can’t our Party just say it’s great we achieved the objective and destroyed
Iran’s nuclear sites, god bless the soldiers who carried this out and made it home safely,
god bless our country, military, allies, and we look forward to a full intel briefing. .
If one must then assert Congressional authority at the moment, add that any
escalation will require congressional approval.
And if you must, express concern for where this may go and what might come next.
But, for so many in my Party to knee jerk with unhinged calls for impeachment -
and sadly omit in their statement support for Iran not having nuclear weapons,
which has been a principle of our Party for 40 years -is truly TDS.
The esteemed barrister that goes by the handle ChiGoose, has already declared the action blatantly unconstitutional. Turrentine is, therefore, wrong.
-
1
-
-
4 minutes ago, Roundybout said:
The land the federal government owns in the west is pristine and also not developable. Leave it be.Do you have data to support the “not developable” claim?
-
NYT bringing the heat!
-
1
-
2
-
-
41 minutes ago, Mikie2times said:
Let’s celebrate how the president of the US likely made part of this decision to offset the TACO stigma. That his pride is important enough to impact decisions that affect the entire US. Yea, let’s celebrate this man.
My god 🙃
It was all about Trump’s ego!
sigh
-
1
-
1
-
-
On 10/13/2023 at 10:30 PM, ChiGoose said:
I personally think that anyone who is ok with the human trafficking currently being done by Texas should be ridiculed, mocked, and shunned from decent society for the rest of their lives. They should never be able to be in public without being shamed.
But that’s just me, I guess.
“Everyone else is dumb”
-chigoose
hoo boy
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, ChiGoose said:
Always funny when people who can’t read or lack critical thinking skills complain about being called stupid.
You can’t fix stupid. But you can point and laugh at them.
Remember how you thought it was gross that one side was happy about the election and that you were apparently morally superior? And now look at you go!!
On 11/6/2024 at 7:50 PM, ChiGoose said:An entire thread dedicated to reveling in fellow Americans being sad and disappointed.
Pretty gross.
A lot of people here just telling on themselves.
Fellow Americans!!
-
11 minutes ago, Trump_is_Mentally_fit said:
Ya, now there is honor among criminals and thugs? Ya sure. I bet Putin is just crying about his Iranian buddies plight, lol. Whatever
You don’t seem to want to address the question. That’s ok. It’s actually expected.
-
1
-
-
4 minutes ago, Trump_is_Mentally_fit said:
Huh? What simplistic idea is floating through your little brain on this?
How many posts do you believe there are from you and your likeminded liberal friends saying Trump is Putin’s btch? Just wondering what the status of btch-being is after Putin’s ally just got smoked. That’s not a nice way to treat your master, is it?
-
1
-
-
Is Trump still Putin’s btch? Wondering how that whole idea goes after tonight. There are a lot of people invested in that thinking. Should be fun to see how those people frame this.
-
15 minutes ago, Mikie2times said:
Don’t pretend like you know what erudite means.
Sorry, Trump ran on ensuring Iran doesn’t have nuclear capability and using military force if required. You MAGA are such inbreds.
Touchy!
-
1 minute ago, Mikie2times said:
He would be the weakest player on any poker game *10. If the target doesn’t have ability to respond aggressively he will be be aggressive. If the target can respond aggressively he will bluff. Just keep repeating this until the end of time.
You want to boil the matter of Iran’s nuclear ambitions down to Trump’s ego. I say go for it! Makes you seem erudite and rational.
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, Mikie2times said:
Stunning. A guy whose ego keeps getting flicked over inaction overcorrects.
Deep thoughts. Thank you.
-
1 minute ago, Roundybout said:
I love the little tough guy faces they’re trying to make. Vance looks like he just let out a wet fart and is trying to hold it in.We’ve all been there.
-
Kristol is alternative scum at this point, I think. Anyway, this had to go somewhere.
-
2
-
1
-
Terrorist / Iranian Sleeper Cells Allowed into USA
in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Posted
I don’t really care if you’re left, right, or center. I’m just hoping you can be funny. I’m not optimistic.