
JDHillFan
Community Member-
Posts
3,579 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by JDHillFan
-
I know that you desperately want to believe. It’s got to be difficult when you don’t actually read what you link to. This morning you have been kind enough to share, in your own self-assured way, links from Vanity Fare and the official release of the transcript from CBS. I’m hoping you can clear something up. The VF article includes this quote from the VP: The aid that we have given Israel allowed Israel to defend itself against 200 ballistic missiles that were just meant to attack the Israelis and the people of Israel. And when we think about the threat that Hamas, Hezbollah presents, Iran, I think that it is without any question our imperative to do what we can to allow Israel to defend itself against those kinds of attacks. That quote is wholly absent from the CBS transcript. Clearly you didn’t know that. That’s ok and expected at this point. My question - why is the transcript different from what the VP actually said? What is CBS doing with this?
-
“No” -roundy
-
This is from the link to variety that you posted: The two clips have circulated on social media side-by-side as the network faces calls to release the full interview transcript. You claim the transcript has been released. Who is correct? You or variety? Did you not read what you linked to? Yes, the screeching! Thank you for not disappointing.
-
NYT - voice of the right! From the tenor of your posts, I imagine you to be upper middle-age, but you have the cluelessness of a Gen Z person. It’s quite the paradox. In general, this thread is about media malfeasance. You happen to find it in the New York Times with their right wing bent. While that’s hilarious to anyone that might read that, you are encouraged to believe it. Now the question that will probably be too much for you to give a straight answer to. Why do you think CBS altered video to make her seem slightly more coherent than she was during the interview? They left out some pretty important stuff.
-
Tim Walz Was A Great Pick Thread
JDHillFan replied to Trump_is_Mentally_fit's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
-
Tim Walz Was A Great Pick Thread
JDHillFan replied to Trump_is_Mentally_fit's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
-
I didn’t answer your question because it was effing stupid. let’s hope your faith in China is well placed and it all works out. It would be good for everyone.
-
You should continue to heraldthe successes of the world runaway leading polluter in their efforts to combat climate change. It will make it seem like you’re onto something that no one else in the world is.
-
So it’s your belief that China is on the right track in their efforts to fight climate change. That’s what you want us to believe? Awesome stuff.
-
What’s the point you’re trying to make with China and their production of solar panels? You must have one. Surely you’re not defending China’s record as polluters. That would be weird.
-
“Sure, China is the world’s leading polluter by far but they are doing it in service to green energy” -you That’s some take!
-
I generally enjoy listening to him on the Smerconish program Wednesday mornings at 10 AM. Who the hell knows? That said, Frankish will be along shortly to shoot the messenger based on #MeToo, all the while ignoring media reports about Mr. Emhoff being a dirtbag.
-
You are going full Tiberius I see. Never go full Tiberius. Any thoughts on the editing that CBS did? Patriots like Command Sergeant Major* Tim Walz literally pretended to go to war to protect American ideals, the greatest of which is freedom of speech. That you would advocate for censorship and thereby sh*t on his and others service is very sad. * there is some dispute about his rank. Not entirely sure why. He may have used poor grammar, misspoke, lied, was a knucklehead.
-
Omg. That is HILARIOUS!! Or maybe it’s just edgy. Either way, absolutely fabulous work.
-
And the 2024 Race Begins
JDHillFan replied to The Frankish Reich's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Sadly enough