Jump to content

Westside

Community Member
  • Posts

    4,717
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Westside

  1. 38 minutes ago, /dev/null said:

     

    According to Wiki, the 25 deadliest mass shootings in the US are

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_shootings_in_the_United_States

     

    Mass shootings since the "Assault Weapons" ban sunset in the early 2000s:

     

    Swing state mass shootings

    Orlando, FL
    Parkland, FL
    Pittsburgh, PA

     

    Red state mass shootings
    Sutherland Springs, TX
    El Paso, Tx
    Santa Fe, TX

    Geneva County, AL

     

    Blue state mass shootings

    Las Vegas, NV
    Virginia Tech
    Sandy Hook, CT
    San Ysidro, CA
    San Bernadino, CA
    Binghamton, NY
    Aurora, CO
    Washington Navy Yard
    Thousand Oaks, CA
    Virginia Beach, VA

    Thanks /dev/null

  2. On 8/5/2019 at 9:00 PM, jrober38 said:

     

    Anyway you define it, this is something the US sees happen far more than any other developed country. 

     

    The notion that bad guys will always find guns simply doesn't ring true with any consistency anywhere else in the developed world.

     

    My opinion is that if you make it harder to get guns, these loner, lone wolf shooters with no social skills usually have no idea how to find the black market let alone purchase a high powered rifle there. The black market is a place for career criminals to find weapons, but I don't think the type of deranged psycho who wants to kill a bunch of random people will have any success buying illegal weapons there, otherwise you'd see these things happen way more in other developed countries around the world. 

    I wonder what percentage of mass shootings are in blue states compared to red states? 

    NY, chi, Detroit, Baltimore, Gary Indiana, LA. If you take away these democratic run ***** holes, I wonder how much your crime statistics improve?

  3. 14 minutes ago, OldTimeAFLGuy said:

    ...normal Chicago day...skee ball and target practice...........

    At least 7 people shot in Chicago park; 1 killed, 3 others wounded in separate shooting

     

    By Nicole Darrah | Fox News 
    Published 1 hour ago

    At least seven people were wounded by gunfire early Sunday in Chicago after someone opened fire near a playground on the city's west side.

     

    The shooting happened around 1:20 a.m. in Douglas Park, according to the Chicago Sun-Times. Authorities said someone shot their weapon from inside a black Chevrolet Camaro on the street.

    I wonder why this isn't headline news? Can anyone explain why?

  4. 6 hours ago, Thurmal34 said:

     

     Because he’s brutally bad at reality. Carp or Deranged? No one knows!

     

    Here is the thing - you choose racism over tippenany.

     

    the best part is the reaction “don’t make us vote racist, because you wouldn’t like us when we vote racist.”

     

     

    Are you one of those idiots who sees racism everywhere?

    If your idea of forward means turning America into a socialist country,  I'd rather go backwards. 

    • Like (+1) 2
  5. 5 hours ago, BeginnersMind said:

     

    You realize Trump and current Reps is spending more and taxing less right? Is this the responsibility government of which you speak? Because I see the budget decisions of the last few years exacerbating a serious long term problem. He looks a lot like what has come before on govt growth. 

    Lol, now you care?

  6. 3 hours ago, ExiledInIllinois said:

    He lost the popular vote by a mile.  His electoral thread is the horrible humans behind the blue firewall in IA, WI, MI, PA.  Those white, blue collar racists.

     

    We are more polarized between the Coastal Elites and the Indiana type Trailer trash.

     

    EDIT: You don't think people are getting tired, worn down by the daily drama, dysfunction Trump brings.  Don't underestimate the power of: "Anybody but Trump."  It worked against Hillary.

    Nope, I think people are getting tired of the hateful left, antifa, screams of racism every chance they get, snowflakes with kitty hats screaming outrage in the streets. The BS Russian collusion, the Cavanaugh ***** show the left put on. That's just a few things people are getting tired of. There's a lot more than that. 

    Keep it up though. You're just making it easier for President Trump to be re-elected. 

    • Like (+1) 3
  7. Just now, jrober38 said:

     

    What point?

    The left is batsh$t crazy. You throw the word racist around like you're some kind of specialist on who's racist and who's not.

    Who are to just blatantly call people out as racist?who the ***** made the left think they have the right to call people racist without knowing them?

     

    • Like (+1) 1
  8. 4 minutes ago, jrober38 said:

     

    I don't think everyone on the right is a racist.


    But I do think all racists are drawn to the right, and Donald Trump. 

     

    I just saw the video of the Illinois gas attendant accusing strangers of being illegals just because they're speaking Spanish. I'm 100% certain that guy is a racist, and I'm equally certain he's a Trump supporter. 

     

    Nowadays everyone gets labelled as the most extreme version of their party.

     

    Not all Republicans are racists. Not all Democrats are socialists. 

     

    Using those extremes isn't helpful, because it makes those extreme positions seem mainstream, which they're mostly not.

    Thanks, you just proved my point. Get some help. 

    • Like (+1) 2
  9. 23 minutes ago, ExiledInIllinois said:

    Oh voy.  Yes, sarcastic about Poland.

     

    Not sarcastic about Trump.  Of course he's racist.  And people who vote for him are too. That's how the whole "basket of deplorables" thing got started

     

    Now... We all gotta run off and protest vote because feelings are hurt that people can't look inward at their own demons.  At least it's not Hillary!  Anybody but Hillary!

    You must be a miserable person to be around. I think you seriously need some help. 

    • Like (+1) 1
  10. 2 hours ago, The Red King said:

    The thread title is misleading.  At no point did the report determine or state there was no collusion.  Rather, it was their conclusion that there was not enough evidence to prove or disprove collusion.  So, the report's answer to "Was there collusion?" is simply, "I dunno.  Maybe?".  And with all the time and effort invested, that's in some ways even more frustrating then a clear, decisive yes or no.

     

    At the same time, it is vexing to hear Trump and some Republicans repeatedly saying the Report confirmed no collusion when they damn well know that's a lie.  Saying you didn't get a good enough look so you can't really say if a boy stole a cookie or not does not mean the kid didn't take one.  It doesn't exonorate him.  Yet that's exactly what Trump and the Republicans are claiming, despite knowing full well it is an outright lie.  And they're doing so trusting many Americans won't actually read the report and as a result might actually buy the manure they're peddling.

    Lol!!!!

    It's good to know you're not biased in any way. 

    This was the funniest post I've read in days. 

     

×
×
  • Create New...